Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2007; 13(6): 925-929
Published online Feb 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.925
Published online Feb 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.925
Parameters | n (%) |
Gender | |
Male | 60 (64) |
Female | 34 (36) |
Age (yr) | 40.8 + 12.8 |
Histopathology | |
Positive | 66 (70) |
Negative | 28 (30) |
UBT | |
Positive | 63 (67) |
Negative | 31 (33) |
Rapid urease test | |
Positive | 61 (65) |
Negative | 33 (35) |
UBTcompared to: | Sensitivity(95% CI) | Specificity(95% CI) | PPV(95% CI) | NPV(95% CI) | Accuracy |
Histopathology | 92% (87-95) | 93% (79-99) | 97% (91-99) | 84% (72-89) | 93% |
Rapid urease test | 98% (93-99) | 91% (80-94) | 95% (89-97) | 97% (86-99) | 96% |
Groups | Patients (n) | Histopathology | UBT | RUT |
Group 1 | 59 | + | + | + |
2 | + | + | - | |
1 | + | - | + | |
4 | + | - | - | |
Group 2 | 1 | - | + | + |
1 | - | + | - | |
26 | - | - | - |
-
Citation: Rasool S, Abid S, Jafri W. Validity and cost comparison of 14carbon urea breath test for diagnosis of
H Pylori in dyspeptic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(6): 925-929 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i6/925.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.925