Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2007; 13(48): 6538-6548
Published online Dec 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i48.6538
Published online Dec 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i48.6538
Table 1 Body weight of different groups of mice
Table 2 Final weight of liver and kidney of different groups of animals sacrificed 30 d post-EAC inoculation
Organ (s) | Final weight (g) | |||
Normal control | EAC control | ALE control | EAC + ALE | |
Liver | 1.25 ± 0.04 | 1.13 ± 0.06 | 1.26 ± 0.08 | 1.23 ± 0.03 |
Kidney | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.04 |
Table 3 Effect of ALE on tumour cell count in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma-bearing mice
Table 4 Changes in total count (TC), Hb level and haematocrit in different groups of mice treated with or without ALE
Days following EACcell inoculation | Group | TC (RBC) (106/mm3) | TC (WBC) (106/mm3) | Hb (g%) | Haematocrit (%) |
0 | Normal control | 7.3 ± 0.12 | 5.8 ± 0.23 | 12.6 ± 0.16 | 33.43 ± 0.16 |
EAC control | 7.2 ± 0.15 | 6.5 ± 0.52 | 12.0 ± 0.31 | 32.16 ± 0.27 | |
ALE control | 7.3 ± 0.14 | 5.9 ± 0.22 | 12.5 ± 0.16 | 33.58 ± 0.25 | |
EAC + ALE | 7.3 ± 0.13 | 6.2 ± 0.15 | 12.2 ± 0.27 | 33.11 ± 0.23 | |
10 | Normal control | 7.4 ± 0.14 | 5.8 ± 0.63 | 12.6 ± 0.65 | 33.51 ± 0.32 |
EAC control | 6.6 ± 0.76 | 10.4 ± 0.72b | 10.0 ± 0.78a | 25.74 ± 0.53c | |
ALE control | 7.6 ± 0.18 | 5.7 ± 0.55 | 12.8 ± 0.61 | 33.75 ± 0.35 | |
EAC + ALE | 6.9 ± 0.53 | 7.7 ± 0.68e | 11.0 ± 0.49 | 29.08 ± 0.69d | |
20 | Normal control | 7.3 ± 0.54 | 5.7 ± 0.43 | 12.4 ± 0.78 | 33.46 ± 0.17 |
EAC control | 5.1 ± 0.67a | 13.9 ± 0.56b | 8.2 ± 0.92f | 21.05 ± 0.26c | |
ALE control | 7.5 ± 0.51 | 5.7 ± 0.38 | 12.6 ± 0.73 | 33.71 ± 0.18 | |
EAC + ALE | 6.7 ± 0.12 | 7.9 ± 0.48d | 11.5 ± 0.57h | 28.87 ± 0.35d | |
30 | Normal control | 7.5 ± 0.14 | 5.8 ± 0.23 | 12.7 ± 0.84 | 33.49 ± 0.16 |
EAC control | 4.3 ± 0.12b | 18.8 ± 0.54b | 6.4 ± 0.93b | 17.63 ± 0.72c | |
ALE control | 7.7 ± 0.13 | 5.7 ± 0.24 | 12.9 ± 0.76 | 33.65 ± 0.21 | |
EAC + ALE | 7.1 ± 0.13d | 8.4 ± 0.71d | 12.1 ± 0.77d | 30.23 ± 0.57d |
Table 5 Effect of ALE on sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies (500 plates/group) in different groups of mice killed at various time points
Weeks after tumour inoculation | Group | MeanSCE/cell | Reduction infrequency (%) |
1 | EAC control | 4.59 ± 0.57 | - |
EAC + ALE | 3.62 ± 0.29 | 21.13 | |
2 | EAC control | 6.89 ± 1.13 | - |
EAC + ALE | 3.78 ± 0.78a | 45.14 | |
3 | EAC control | 7.83 ± 1.05 | - |
EAC + ALE | 4.64 ± 0.54b | 40.74 | |
4 | EAC control | 10.26 ± 1.67 | - |
EAC + ALE | 4.83 ± 0.69c | 52.92 | |
5 | EAC control | 14.94 ± 2.14 | - |
EAC + ALE | 5.12 ± 1.16d | 65.73 |
Table 6 Effect of ALE on the generation of average number of single-strand breaks (SSBs)/DNA fragment in murine liver 24 h and 5 d post-EAC transplantation
Time followingEAC inoculation | Group | DS-DNA(%) | No. of SSBs/DNA fragment | Inhibition(%) |
24 h | Normal control | 94.75 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | ---- |
EAC control | 79.57 | 1.28 ± 0.22b | ---- | |
ALE control | 94.87 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | ---- | |
EAC + ALE | 88.23 | 1.14 ± 0.15 | ---- | |
5 d | Normal control | 95.12 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | ---- |
EAC control | 17.21 | 3.14 ± 0.31b | ---- | |
ALE control | 94.93 | 0.07 ± 0.3 | ---- | |
EAC + ALE | 55.83 | 1.93 ± 0.23d | 38.53 |
-
Citation: Chakraborty T, Bhuniya D, Chatterjee M, Rahaman M, Singha D, Chatterjee BN, Datta S, Rana A, Samanta K, Srivastawa S, Maitra SK, Chatterjee M.
Acanthus ilicifolius plant extract prevents DNA alterations in a transplantable Ehrlich ascites carcinoma-bearing murine model. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(48): 6538-6548 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i48/6538.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i48.6538