Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2007; 13(47): 6396-6403
Published online Dec 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6396
Published online Dec 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6396
Table 1 The primer sequence of the p16 genes
Exon | Primer sequence | Size(bp) | Anneling temperature (°C) |
Exon1α | F: 5'-GAGAGGGGGAGAGCAGGCAG-3' | 250 | 58 |
R: 5'-GCAAACTTCGTCCTCCAGAGT-3' | |||
Exon2-1 | F: 5'-AGCTTCCTTTCCGTCATGC-3' | 203 | 56 |
R: 5'-GCAGCACCACCAGCGTG-3' | |||
Exon2-2 | F: 5'-AGCCCAACTGCGCCGAC-3' | 147 | 58 |
R: 5'-CCAGGTCCACGGGCAGA-3' | |||
Exon2-3 | F: 5'-TGGACGTGCGCGATGC-3' | 189 | 56 |
R: 5'-GGAAGCTCTCAGGGTACAAATTC-3' | |||
Exon3 | F: 5'-CCGGTAGGGACGGCAAGAGA-3' | 169 | 58 |
R: 5'-CTGTAGGACCCTCGGTGACTGATGA-3' |
Table 2 Association between p16 alterations and clinicopathological variables in gallbladder cancers
Clinicopathological variables | p16 protein expression | Methylation of p16INK4a | LOH at 9p21-22 | Homozygous deletion of p16 gene | ||||||||
Absent n | Present n | P | Absent n | Present n | P | Retension n | LOH n | P | Absent n | Present n | P | |
Age | ||||||||||||
< 65 | 13 | 7 | 0.789 | 5 | 15 | 0.753 | 10 | 10 | 0.427 | 13 | 6 | 0.481 |
> 65 | 19 | 12 | 9 | 22 | 12 | 19 | 24 | 7 | ||||
Gender | ||||||||||||
Female | 14 | 11 | 0.329 | 6 | 19 | 0.588 | 10 | 15 | 0.657 | 20 | 4 | 0.148 |
Male | 18 | 8 | 8 | 18 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 9 | ||||
Tumor type | ||||||||||||
Adenocarcinoma | 28 | 18 | 0.401 | 14 | 32 | 0.148 | 19 | 27 | 0.423 | 35 | 10 | 0.068 |
Adenosquamous | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Differentiation grade | ||||||||||||
Well-Moderate | 22 | 17 | 0.144 | 12 | 27 | 0.907 | 18 | 21 | 0.115 | 29 | 10 | 0.16 |
Poor | 6 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
Stage | ||||||||||||
0 and IA, IB | 15 | 13 | 0.135 | 9 | 19 | 0.407 | 15 | 13 | 0.097 | 20 | 7 | 0.99 |
IIA and IIB | 17 | 6 | 5 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 17 | 6 | ||||
T factor | ||||||||||||
Tis and T1 | 6 | 6 | 0.296 | 3 | 9 | 0.828 | 8 | 4 | 0.060 | 11 | 1 | 0.11 |
T2 and T3 | 26 | 13 | 11 | 28 | 14 | 25 | 26 | 12 | ||||
N factor | ||||||||||||
N0 | 21 | 16 | 0.150 | 9 | 28 | 0.416 | 19 | 18 | 0.054 | 28 | 8 | 0.329 |
N1 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 5 |
Table 3 Association between p16 protein expression and 9p21-22
p16 protein expression | |||
Negative | Positive | P | |
LOH (-) | 12 | 10 | |
LOH (+) | 20 | 9 | 0.292 |
Table 4 Association between p16 protein expression and LOH at 9p21
p16 protein expression | |||
Negative | Positive | P | |
LOH (-) | 16 | 16 | |
LOH (+) | 16 | 3 | 0.0146 |
Table 5 Association between p16 immunohistochemistry and p16 alterations in gallbladder cancers
p16 immunohistochemistry | |||
Positive | Negative | P | |
Retension | 3 | 3 | |
Hypermethyaltion | 9 | 6 | |
LOH | 1 | 3 | |
LOH (multiple) + Hypermethylation | 2 | 8 | |
Multiple LOH | 0 | 3 | |
Homozygous deletion | 4 | 9 | P < 0.05 |
- Citation: Tadokoro H, Shigihara T, Ikeda T, Takase M, Suyama M. Two distinct pathways of p16 gene inactivation in gallbladder cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(47): 6396-6403
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i47/6396.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6396