Colorectal Cancer
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2007; 13(4): 515-524
Published online Jan 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i4.515
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of study patients
Median age (mean ± SD) (yr)64 (61.75 ± 10.0)
M:F1:1
Lymph node involvement prior to radiotherapy (cN)
cN02562.5%
cN+1537.5%
Tumor stage
ypT012.5%
ypT1410%
ypT2615%
ypT32972.5%
Lymph node status
ypN02665%
ypN1820%
ypN2615%
Number of lymph node assessed-median (mean ± SD)16 (18 ± 11.5)
Number of affected lymph nodes-median (mean ± SD)0 (2.6 ± 6.9)
Tumor histological grade (G)1
G1512.8%
G23282.1%
G325.1%
Median tumor diameter1 (mean ± SD) (mm)33.5 (33.7 ± 16.1)
Table 2 Relationship between “T-downstaging” and prognostic parameters
FeatureGroup R (n = 11)Group NR (n = 29)P
Median age (range) (mean ± SD) (yr)70 (55-77) (67.7 ± 7.2)61 (45-70) (59.4 ± 9.9)< 0.05
Tumor stage< 0.000
ypT01 (9.1%)0
ypT14 (36.4%)0
ypT26 (54.6%)0
ypT3029 (100.0%)
TRG< 0.08
11 (9.1%)0
22 (18.2%)1 (3.5%)
36 (54.6%)11 (37.9%)
42 (18.2%)14 (48.3%)
503 (10.3%)
NG< 0.08
15 (45.5%)4 (13.8%)
22 (18.2%)4 (13.8%)
34 (36.4%)21 (72.4%)
Table 3 Relationship between tumor stage and TRG
TRG 1TRG 2TRG 3TRG 4TRG 5
Local tumor stage1a
ypT01----
ypT1-22--
ypT2--42-
ypT3-111143
Lymph nodes involvement2c
ypN013148-
ypN1--152
ypN2--231
Table 4 Relationship between tumor stage and NG
NG 1NG 2NG 3
Local tumor stage1b
ypT01--
ypT131-
ypT2114
ypT34421
Lymph node involvement2a
ypN09512
ypN1--8
ypN2-15