Does type of instrument influence colonoscopy performance and sedation practice?

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 3

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

173

HTML

1097

Tables (1-1)

127

Sum=1397

Jan 21, 2007 (publication date) through Dec 2, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Letters To The Editor

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2007; 13(3): 486-487
Published online Jan 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.486

Table 1 Subject characteristics and summary of results

SD: Standard Deviation; Mdz: Midazolam; CIR: Caecal intubation rates; TIR: Terminal ileal intubation rate.

^bP < 0.001,

^dP < 0.001 comparison between Fujinon EC-450 and Olympus CF 240 on mean dose of Mdz and CIR.

Citation: Arasaradnam RP, Hurlstone PD. Does type of instrument influence colonoscopy performance and sedation practice? World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(3): 486-487
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i3/486.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.486