Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2007; 13(3): 378-382
Published online Jan 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.378
Published online Jan 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.378
Grade | Ductdilation | Periductalfibrosis | Intralobularfibrosis | Glandularatrophy |
F0 | - | - | - | - |
F1 | + | - | - | - |
F2 | + | + | - | - |
F3 | + | + | + | - |
F4 | + | + | + | + |
Group | n | Positive proportion |
2 (Control) | 8 | 42 ± 6 |
3 (emodin, 20 mg/kg) | 8 | 39 ± 7 |
4 (emodin, 40 mg/kg) | 8 | 38 ± 4 |
5 (emodin, 80 mg/kg) | 9 | 36 ± 5a |
Group | n | 0 | + | +2 | +3 | +4 |
1 (Normal) | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 (Control) | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
3 (emodin, 20 mg/kg) | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
4 (emodin, 40 mg/kg) | 8 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
5 (emodin, 80 mg/kg) | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Citation: Wang CH, Gao ZQ, Ye B, Cai JT, Xie CG, Qian KD, Du Q. Effect of emodin on pancreatic fibrosis in rats. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(3): 378-382
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i3/378.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.378