Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2007; 13(27): 3721-3725
Published online Jul 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3721
Published online Jul 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3721
Table 1 Patient and treatment characteristics of 36 patients with anastomotic leakage confirmed by relaparotomy
Characteristic | n (%) |
Gender | |
Male | 21 (58) |
Female | 15 (42) |
Mean age (range) ( yr) | 67 (26-87) |
Mean Quetelet index (range) | 25 (17-43) |
American Society of Anesthesiology score | |
1 | 14 (39) |
2 | 16 (44) |
3 | 6 (17) |
Comorbidity | |
Laparotomy in medical history | 14 (39) |
Diabetes mellitus | 6 (17) |
Cardiovascular disease | 17 (47) |
Preoperative radiotherapy | 4 (11) |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 8 (22) |
Type of operation | |
Ileocolonic resection | 5 (14) |
Right hemicolectomy | 3 (8) |
Transverse colonic resection | 2 (6) |
Left hemicolectomy | 1 (3) |
Sigmoidal resection | 14 (39) |
Subtotal colectomy | 3 (8) |
Anterior resection | 7 (19) |
Restoring continuity after colostomy | 1 (3) |
Table 2 Incidence and median postoperative day of first occurrence of simple clinical parameters in 36 patients with anastomotic leakage confirmed at relaparotomy
Variable | Incidence(%) | Median postoperativeday (SD) |
Tachycardia (> 100 beats/min) | 61 | 4 (2.6) |
Fever (> 38°C) | 67 | 5 (2.4) |
Peritoneal reaction | 28 | 6 (3.7) |
Leucocytosis (> 10 × 103/mL) | 72 | 6 (2.5) |
Adynamic ileus | 47 | 6 (4.6) |
Delayed gastric emptying | 67 | 4 (2.0) |
Table 3 Median time intervals between first occurrence of clinical parameters or the attending doctor’s suggestion of anastomotic leakage in the medical record and relaparotomy
Signs/symptomsFirst occurrence of: | Median delay ofrelaparotomy (d) | SD | Range |
Tachycardia | 2.0 | 7.2 | 0-29 |
Fever | 2.8 | 5.7 | 0-29 |
Peritoneal reaction | 0.8 | 2.8 | 0-8 |
Leucocytosis | 2.0 | 6.1 | 0-29 |
Ileus | 1.5 | 2.4 | 0-9 |
Delayed gastric emptying | 2.0 | 5.2 | 0-25 |
At least one parameter | 3.5 | 5.7 | 0-29 |
At least two parameters | 2.5 | 5.4 | 0-12 |
At least three parameters | 1.8 | 5.7 | 0-8 |
Doctor’s suggestion of leakage in medical record | 1.0 | 5.1 | 0-29 |
Table 4 Risk factors for prolonged delay of relaparotomy because of anastomotic leakage
Variable | n | Mean delay (d) | P | |
Age (yr) | < 70 | 19 | 4.5 | 0.71 |
≥ 70 | 17 | 4.9 | ||
Sex | Male | 21 | 4.5 | 0.95 |
Female | 15 | 4.9 | ||
Body mass index (kg/m2) | < 25 | 181 | 4.6 | 0.29 |
≥ 25 | 14 | 5.3 | ||
Site of anastomosis | Left | 25 | 4.8 | 0.29 |
Right | 11 | 4.3 | ||
Radiological examination performed | Yes | 21 | 6.0 | 0.051 |
No | 15 | 2.7 | ||
Outcome of radiological examination | FN | 9 | 8.1 | 0.007 |
TP/NP | 27 | 3.5 | ||
Weekend included in periodbetween first clinical parameter and relaparotomy | Yes | 142 | 4.2 | 0.021 |
No | 18 | 2.4 |
- Citation: Doeksen A, Tanis P, Vrouenraets B, Lanschot van J, Tets van W. Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(27): 3721-3725
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i27/3721.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i27.3721