BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Rapid Communication
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2007; 13(22): 3101-3105
Published online Jun 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i22.3101
Table 1 Patients treated with anal plugs or RCI and response to questionaire n (%)
Anal plugsRCITotal
nResponsenResponsenResponse
Adults148 (57)7940 (51)9346 (49)
Children (< 18 yr)167 (44)9248 (52)10855 (51)
Total3015 (50)17188 (51)201101 (50)
Table 2 Demographics and actual use of retrograde colonic irrigation in adult patients n (%)
Fecal incontinenceConstipationP
Total2812
Age (yr)4246
Female /male23/59/3
Urological problems15 (54)6 (50)
Gynaecological problems3 (11)3 (25)
Neurological disease11 (39)3 (25)
- Spinal bifida42
- Multiple sclerosis21
- Spinal injury30
Anal atresia20
Impact complaints social life16 (64)8 (67)
Actual using RCI20 (71)5 (42)0.09
Therapy satisfaction all patients23 (82)6 (50)0.056
Therapy satisfaction among actual users19 (95)3 (60)0.7
Table 3 Demographics and use of retrograde colonic irrigation in children n (%)
Fecal incontinenceConstipation
Total2622
Age (yr)1113
Female /male14/1212/10
Urological problems22 (85)17 (77)
Any surgery25 (96)19 (86)
Neurological disease11 (96)3 (25)
- Spina bifida1910
- Hirsschprungs disease13
- Anorectal malformation43
- Idiopathic constipation05
- Miscellaneous disorders21
Impact complaints social life15 (58)14 (64)
Actual using RCI23 (88)20 (91)
Therapy satisfaction all patients24 (92)21 (88)
Therapy satisfaction among actual users23 (100)20 (100)


Write to the Help Desk