Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2006; 12(48): 7810-7814
Published online Dec 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7810
Published online Dec 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7810
Table 1 Main characteristics of the patients
| Characteristics | n = 126 |
| Age (yr, median and range) | 56 (32 to 83) |
| Sex (M/F) | 103/23 |
| Causes of cirrhosis [n (%)] | |
| - Alcoholism | 101 (80%) |
| - Hepatitis virus (B, C) | 11 (9%) |
| - Alcoholism plus another cause | 4 (3%) |
| - Other causes | 5 (4%) |
| - Unknown | 5 (4%) |
| Child-Pugh class A/B/C (n)1 | 27/42/53 |
Table 2 Previous bleeding and prophylaxis given before the index bleeding
| Prophylaxis | n (%) |
| First bleeding event1 | 79 (63) |
| - Cirrhosis known before admission | 40/79 |
| - Prior endoscopy | 25/40 |
| - Prophylaxis before admission: | 16/25 |
| Esophageal varices stage 0-1: | 0/7 |
| Esophageal varices stage 2-3: | 16/18 |
| • Beta-blockade | 12 |
| • Ligation | 2 |
| • Ligation and beta-blockade | 2 |
| Recurrent bleeding | 46 (37) |
| - Prophylaxis before admission: | |
| • None2 | 11 (24) |
| • Sclerosis | 2 (4) |
| • Ligation | 4 (9) |
| • Beta-blockade | 13 (28) |
| • Ligation/sclerosis plus beta-blockade/nitrate derivative | 16 (35) |
Table 3 Management of the bleeding event in 126 consecutive patients: conformity with the Baveno III consensus and regional variability
| Baveno III guidelines | n (%) of cases complying with the guidelines(95% confidence limits) | Variability among sectors(range, P a) |
| Endoscopy within 12 h after admission from home | 60 (60%) (50%-70%) | 52% to 71% P = 0.85 |
| Blood restitution to maintain hematocrit at 25% to 30% | 84 (89%) (81%-95%) | ND |
| (n = 94 patients transfused) | ||
| Early vasoactive drug infusion | 110 (87%) (80%-92%) | 71% to 100% P = 0.081 |
| Median time after admission: 2 h | ||
| Endoscopic treatment: ligation or sclerosis | - Ligation 52 (42%) (33%-51%) | 29% to 61% P = 0.17 |
| - Sclerosis 26 (21%) (14%-29%) | 7% to 43% P = 0.29 | |
| Antibiotic prophylaxis | 81 (64%) (55%-73%) | 50% to 75% P = 0.41 |
| Prophylaxis 87%/infection 13% | ||
| Lactulose administration | 50 (40%) (32%-49%) | 26% to 86% P = 0.041 |
| Prophylaxis 57%/encephalopathy 43% | ||
| Prophylaxis of rebleeding: beta blockers or ligation | - Beta-blockers alone 31% (22%-41%) | 0 to 45% |
| - Ligation and beta-blockers 33% | 16% to 100% | |
| (24%-43%) | ||
| - Ligation alone 19% (12%-29%) | 0 to 37% | |
| - Others or none 17% (10%-26%) | 0 to 44% | |
| P = 0.0003 |
- Citation: Ingrand P, Gournay J, Bernard P, Oberti F, Bernard-Chabert B, Pauwels A, Renard P, Bartoli E, Cadranel JF, Barbare JC, Ingrand I, Beauchant M, Portale TCFPLL. Management of digestive bleeding related to portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients: A French multicenter cross-sectional practice survey. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(48): 7810-7814
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i48/7810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7810
