Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2006; 12(38): 6161-6166
Published online Oct 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6161
Published online Oct 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6161
Table 1 Basal features of patients in the four preparation groups
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | P | |
Patients (n) | 43 | 45 | 45 | 44 | |
Gender ratio (M/F) | 21:22 | 24:21 | 19:26 | 21:23 | NS |
Age (yr) (mean ± SD) | 58.0 ± 15.9 | 52.4 ± 16.7 | 53.6 ± 15.2 | 54.0 ± 16.5 | NS |
Chronic constipation (%) | 17.1 | 26.3 | 24.4 | 27.2 | NS |
Polyp surveillance (%) | 23.3 | 12.5 | 6.6 | 13.6 | NS |
Table 2 Comparison of rate of patients with cleansing quality ≥ 4, between different treatment groups (mean ± SD, %)
Group | Global | Cecum | Ascending | Transverse | Descending-sigmoid | Rectum |
1 | 78.6 ± 0.2 | 72.1 ± 0.2 | 79.1 ± 0.2 | 81.0 ± 0.1 | 76.7 ± 0.2 | 79.1 ± 0.2 |
2 | 80.0 ± 0.2 | 84.4 ± 0.1 | 77.8 ± 0.2 | 82.2 ± 0.1 | 86.7 ± 0.1 | 86.7 ± 0.1 |
3 | 26.7 ± 0.2b | 38.6 ± 0.2b | 22.2 ± 0.2b | 35.6 ± 0.2b | 60.0 ± 0.2d | 57.8 ± 0.2d |
4 | 6.8 ± 0.1 b | 14.6 ± 0.1b | 9.8 ± 0.1b | 32.6 ± 0.2b | 45.5 ± 0.2b | 50.0 ± 0.2b |
Table 3 Distribution by size and shape of all polyps detected in the patients who received bowel preparation the same day and the day before
Lesion | Preparationsame day(group 1, 2) | Preparationday before(group 3, 4) | P |
Polyp size (mean ± SD) | 5.6 ± 3.8 | 5.3 ± 5.1 | NS |
Polyp size ≤ 5 mm (n = 121) | 59 | 62 | NS |
Flat lesions (n = 37) | 28 | 9 | < 0.01 |
Flat lesions size (mean ± SD) | 4.8 ± 3.7 | 9.0 ± 12.0 | NS |
Protruding polyps (n = 146) | 69 | 77 | NS |
Protruding polyps size (mean ± SD) | 5.9 ± 3.8 | 4.9 ± 3.6 | NS |
Total polyps (flat + protruding) (n = 183) | 97 | 86 | NS |
Table 4 Polyp status in patients who received bowel preparation the same day or the day before (group 3, 4), n (%)
Table 5 Comparison of the tolerance variables in the four groups n (%)
Side effect | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | P |
Nausea | 17 (39.5) | 24 (53.3) | 24 (53.3) | 15 (34.1) | NS |
Vomiting | 4 (9.3) | 10 (22.2) | 10 (22.2) | 8 (18.2) | NS |
Disgusting1 | 10 (23.3) | 12 (26.7) | 12 (26.7) | 12 (27.3) | NS |
Thirst1 | 6 (13.9) | 9 (20.0) | 9 (20) | 12 (27.2) | NS |
Abdominal pain1 | 4 (9.3) | 4 (8.9) | 3 (6.6) | 5 (11.4) | NS |
Anal pain1 | 1 (2.3) | 4 (8.9) | 1 (2.2) | 2 (4.5) | NS |
- Citation: Parra-Blanco A, Nicolás-Pérez D, Gimeno-García A, Grosso B, Jiménez A, Ortega J, Quintero E. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: A randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(38): 6161-6166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i38/6161.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6161