Review
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2006; 12(28): 4461-4465
Published online Jul 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i28.4461
Table 1 Comparison between LDLT and DDLT for hepatitis C virus cirrhosis
StudyNDif1Protocol biopsyFindings
AuthorYearInstitutionLDLTDDLT
Gaglio[23]2003Colombia U.2345YesNoCholestatic hepatitis in 17% of LDLT and 0% of DDLT (P = 0.001). No significant difference in incidence of Rec.
Shiffman[28]2003Virginia Commonwealth U.2253NoYes79% patient survival in LDLT and 91% in DDLT during 3 year (NS). No significant difference in inflammation score in liver specimen after 3 years
Russo[29]2004UNOS data2793955NoNo87% 1-year patient survival in both.
Thuluvath[30]2004UNOS data207408NoNoNo significant difference in patient survival (P = 0.6).
Van Vlierberghe[32]2004Ghent U.1726NoNoRec in 35% of LDLT and 38% of DDLT during 1 year (P = 0.1)
Bozorgzadeh[34]2004Rochester U.3565NoNoRec in 77% of LDLT and 72% of DDLT during 1 year (NS), 89% patient survival in LDLT and 75% in DDLT during 39 mo (NS)