Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2006; 12(25): 4082-4085
Published online Jul 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4082
Published online Jul 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4082
Table 1 Comparison of operative incision of 3 groups
Group | n | Type I incision | Type II incision | Type III incision |
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
EK | 93 | 6 (6.45) | 83 (89.23) | 4 (4.30) |
EC | 55 | 3 (5.45) | 50 (90.91) | 2 (3.64) |
Control | 72 | 5 (6.94) | 63 (87.50) | 4 (5.56) |
Table 2 Infection of incisional sites for the experimental animals
Group | n | EG’s incision healing | Infection | n | CG’s incision healing | Infection | ||||
A | B | C | rate (%) | A | B | C | rate (%) | |||
100 | 30 | 23 | 2 | 5 | 23.33 | 30 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 6.60 |
102 | 27 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 37.04 | 30 | 26 | 1 | 3 | 13.33 |
105 | 30 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 50.00 | 29 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 24.14 |
108 | 30 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 63.33 | 30 | 19 | 2 | 9 | 36.67 |
Table 3 Pathological examination results of experimental animals
Group | n | EG | Infection | n | CG | Infection | ||||||
I | II | III | IV | rate (%) | I | II | III | IV | rate (%) | |||
100 | 30 | 14 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 23.33 | 30 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6.60 |
102 | 27 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 37.04 | 30 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 13.33 |
105 | 30 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 80.00 | 29 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 55.17 |
108 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 83.33 | 30 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 56.67 |
- Citation: Ji GW, Wu YZ, Wang X, Pan HX, Li P, Du WY, Qi Z, Huang A, Zhang LW, Zhang L, Chen W, Liu GH, Xu H, Li Q, Yuan AH, He XP, Mei GH. Experimental and clinical study of influence of high-frequency electric surgical knives on healing of abdominal incision. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(25): 4082-4085
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i25/4082.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4082