Schemmer P, Decker F, Dei-Anane G, Henschel V, Buhl K, Herfarth C, Riedl S. The vital threat of an upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Risk factor analysis of 121 consecutive patients. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(22): 3597-3601 [PMID: 16773718 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i22.3597]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Peter Schemmer, Department of General Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. peter_schemmer@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Article-Type of This Article
Rapid Communication
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Logistic regressions analysis of covariables recorded at admission of 121 patients considering their ability in predicting the patients’ lethality
Covariable
P
Statistical inclusionin model
Odds ratio
95% confidenceinterval
Cirrhotic liver disease
0.005
Yes
4.5
1.4-13.8
Hb
0.256
No
Medication
0.419
No
PT
0.672
No
Age
0.822
No
Gender
0.879
No
Table 3 A logistic regression analysis evaluating 14 prognostic parameters in their ability to increase the predictability of lethality of 67 patients with UGI bleeding resulting from duodenal or gastric ulcer
Covariable
P
Statistical inclusion inmodel
Odds ratio
95% confidence interval
Cirrhotic liver disease
0.029
Yes
5.9
1.1-34.4
Gender
0.065
Yes
4.8
1.0-34.8
Duodenal ulcer (bulbus back wall)
0.135
Yes
3.5
0.6-20.7
Forrest 1 b
0.175
No
Forrest 2 b
0.272
No
Hb
0.285
No
PT
0.641
No
Medication
0.693
No
Forrest 3
0.721
No
Forrest 1 a
0.748
No
Forrest 2 a
0.782
No
Vascular stump
0.852
No
Age
0.926
No
Gastric ulcer (small curvature)
0.964
No
Table 4 Logistic regressions analysis indicating the predictive value of 12 covariables in predicting the lethality of an UGI bleeding
Covariable
P
Statisticalinclusionin model
Odds ratio
95 % confidenceinterval
Cirrhotic liver disease
0.005
Yes
5.7
1.8-19.3
Duodenal ulcer (bulbus back wall)
0.092
Yes
3.4
0.7-14.7
Bleeding recurrance
0.271
No
Hb
0.341
No
Medication
0.345
No
Esophageal varicosis
0.401
No
Number of operations
0.42
No
Substitution of RBCs
0.436
No
PT
0.625
No
Gastric ulcer (small curvature)
0.799
No
Gender
0.809
No
Age
0.863
No
Table 5 Subgroup analysis of 21 patients with UGI bleeding and liver disease (Evaluation of the influence of 9 covariables on the lethality within the group)
Covariable
Odds ratio
95% confidenceinterval
P
Hb
9.75
0.8-121.8
0.077
Bleeding recurrence
4.5
0.6-32.3
0.135
Number of operations
4.5
0.5-37.4
0.164
Substitution of RBCs
1
0.1-7.5
1
Gastric ulcer (small curvature)
1
0.1-13.4
1
PT
0.72
0.1-5.2
0.744
Gender
0.68
0.1-5.5
0.718
Age
0.3
0.03-3.3
0.322
Esophageal varicosis
0.17
0.02-1.8
0.137
Citation: Schemmer P, Decker F, Dei-Anane G, Henschel V, Buhl K, Herfarth C, Riedl S. The vital threat of an upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Risk factor analysis of 121 consecutive patients. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(22): 3597-3601