Copyright
        ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2006; 12(17): 2756-2761
Published online May 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2756
Published online May 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2756
            Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the enrolled patients
        
    | Group | Ecabet group | Cimetidine group | P | 
| (n = 133) | (n = 139) | ||
| Gender (male:female) | 47:86 | 47:92 | NS | 
| Age (yr) | 45.0 ± 12.9 | 47.5 ± 12.5 | NS | 
| Weight (kg) | 59.6 ± 10.0 | 58.5 ± 9.0 | NS | 
| Height (cm) | 162.7 ± 8.0 | 161.8 ± 7.7 | NS | 
| Smoking (%) | 23 (17.3) | 16 (11.5) | NS | 
| Alcohol intake (%) | 47 (35.3) | 38 (27.3) | NS | 
            Table 2 Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection
        
    | Group | Positive (%) | Negative (%) | Undetermined (%) | 
| Ecabet group | 44 | 45 | 31 | 
| (n = 120) | (36.7) | (37.5) | (25.9) | 
| Cimetidine group | 40 | 60 | 28 | 
| (n = 128) | (31.3) | (46.9) | (21.9) | 
            Table 3 Global assessment of symptomatic improvement after 4 wk of medication
        
    | Group | Ecabet group | Cimetidine group | 
| (n = 115) (%) | (n = 121) (%) | |
| Improved | 89 (77.4) | 96 (79.3) | 
| Not improved | 26 (22.6) | 25 (20.7) | 
            Table 4 Comparison of quality of life scores before and after treatment (mean±SD)
        
    | Status | Before treatment | After treatment | ||||
| Ecabet group(n = 115) | Cimetidine group(n = 121) | P | Ecabet group(n = 115) | Cimetidine group(n = 121) | P | |
| Eating status | 15.0 ± 4.6 | 14.8 ± 4.1 | NS | 15.6 ± 4.0 | 15.9 ± 3.5 | NS | 
| Liveliness status | 10.4 ± 4.1 | 10.0 ± 4.0 | NS | 11.6 ± 3.6 | 11.3 ± 3.5 | NS | 
| Psychological status | 18.5 ± 5.0 | 18.6 ± 4.5 | NS | 20.3 ± 4.4 | 20.4 ± 4.1 | NS | 
| Role-functioning status | 20.5 ± 4.2 | 20.6 ± 4.2 | NS | 21.4 ± 3.9 | 21.0 ± 4.3 | NS | 
            Table 5 Comparison of global symptomatic improvement by H pylori status
        
    | H pylori infection | Gastrex group | Cimetidine group | ||
| Improved (%) | Not improved(%) | Improved (%) | Not improved (%) | |
| Negative | 28 (84.85) | 5 (15.15) | 27 (84.38) | 5 (15.63) | 
| Positive | 28 (75.68) | 9 (24.32) | 24 (72.73) | 9 (27.27) | 
            Table 6 Comparison of global symptomatic improvement by age
        
    | Age | Gastrex group | Cimetidine group | ||
| Improveed (%) | Not improved (%) | Improved (%) | Not improved (%) | |
| Less than fifty | 55 (61.8) | 14 (53.85) | 61 (63.54) | 12 (48.0) | 
| fifty and over | 34 (38.2) | 12 (46.15) | 35 (36.46) | 13 (52.0) | 
            Table 7 Comparison of global symptomatic improvement by sex
        
    | Sex | Gastrex group | Cimetidine group | ||
| Improved (%) | Not improved (%) | Improved (%) | Not improved (%) | |
| Men | 27 (71.05) | 11 (28.94) | 34 (79.07) | 9 (20.93) | 
| Women | 63 (80.76) | 15 (19.23) | 62 (79.48) | 16 (20.51) | 
- Citation: Lee JH, Kim JJ, Hahm KB, Lee DH, Kim N, Kim SK, Park JJ, Choi SR, Lee JH, Lee ST, Lee EH, Rhee JC. Efficacy and safety of ecabet sodium on functional dyspepsia: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, multi-center controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(17): 2756-2761
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i17/2756.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i17.2756

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
         
                         
                         
                        