Copyright
        ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2006; 12(15): 2351-2356
Published online Apr 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i15.2351
Published online Apr 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i15.2351
            Table 1 Baseline characteristics in different study groups (mean±SD)
        
    | Groups | n | Body weight | Mean arterial | Heart rate | 
| ( g ) | pressure(mmHg) | (beat/min) | ||
| Vehicle | 8 | 326.7 ± 10.6 | 98.6 ± 3.6 | 296 ± 18 | 
| Verapamil | 8 | 332.6 ± 11.8 | 96.5 ± 4.8 | 320 ± 16 | 
| Verapamil+vehicle | 8 | 321.5 ± 9.8 | 99.5 ± 5.2 | 318 ± 20 | 
| Verapamil+NNA | 8 | 330.8 ± 9.6 | 97.4 ± 3.8 | 317 ± 17 | 
| Verapamil+INDO | 7 | 327.8 ± 8.5 | 94.2 ± 6.2 | 328 ± 14 | 
| Verapamil+ INDO+NNA | 8 | 319.8 ± 7.9 | 96.2 ± 4.8 | 308 ± 15 | 
            Table 2 Effect of verapamil in combination with NNA, INDO, and NNA plus INDO on systemic and splanchnic haemodynamics in PVL rats (mean±SE)
        
    | Verapamil | Verapamil+NNA | Verapamil+INDO | Verapamil+NNA+INDO | |||||
| (n = 8) | (n = 8) | (n = 7) | (n = 8) | |||||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| CI[mL/(min.kg)] | 423 ± 38 | 298 ± 42a | 425 ± 41 | 312 ± 48a | 424 ± 39 | 332 ± 51a | 426 ± 40 | 326 ± 49a | 
| MAP(mmHg) | 105 ± 5 | 96 ± 6a | 106 ± 6 | 99 ± 7a | 107 ± 4 | 98 ± 7a | 106 ± 8 | 100 ± 7a | 
| PP(mmHg) | 15.0 ± 1.6 | 10.8±1.9a | 14.3 ± 1.8 | 13.8 ± 2.1 | 15.2 ± 1.9 | 14.5 ± 2.4 | 15.1 ± 1.6 | 14.6 ± 1.4 | 
| PVI(mL/min) | 27 ± 2.8 | 26 ± 3.2 | 26 ± 2.7 | 25 ± 3.4 | 28 ± 3.1 | 27 ± 3.5 | 27 ± 3.2 | 26 ± 3.9 | 
| HAF(mL/min) | 7 ± 1.6 | 8 ± 1.8 | 8 ± 1.8 | 9 ± 2.2 | 7 ± 1.9 | 8 ± 2.2 | 9 ± 2.0 | 9 ± 2.8 | 
| PSS(%) | 81.7 ± 7.2 | 63.6 ± 8.2a | 80.2 ± 8.3 | 76.5 ± 9.2 | 81.2 ± 6.2 | 77 ± 7.8 | 80.5 ± 6.6 | 76.2 ± 9.5 | 
            Table 3 Effect of verapamil in combination with NNA, INDO, and NNA plus INDO on systemic and splanchnic vascular resistance in PVL rats (mean ± SE)
        
    | Verapamil | Verapamil+NNA | Verapamil+INDO | Verapamil+NNA+INDO | |||||
| (n = 8) | (n = 8) | (n = 7) | (n = 8) | |||||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| TPR (dyh.s.cm-5× 104) | 8.96 ± 0.87 | 6.45 ± 0.78 a | 8.84 ± 0.72 | 8.47 ± 0.98 | 8.76 ± 0.88 | 8.52 ± 0.91 | 8.78 ± 0.93 | 8.58 ± 0.89 | 
| SAR (dyh.s.cm-5× 105) | 4.38 ± 0.72 | 3.16 ± 0.62 a | 4.51 ± 0.89 | 4.18 ± 0.71 | 4.45 ± 0.92 | 4.20 ± 0.84 | 4.46 ± 0.84 | 4.22 ± 0.94 | 
| PVR (dyh.s.cm-5 × 104) | 7.49 ± 0.68 | 6.12 ± 0.58 a | 7.46 ± 0.72 | 7.23 ± 0.67 | 7.54 ± 0.97 | 7.41 ± 0.95 | 7.46 ± 0.65 | 6.95 ± 0.87 | 
- Citation: Lay CS, May C, Lee FY, Tsai YT, Lee SD, Chien S, Sinchon S. Effect of verapamil on nitric oxide synthase in a portal vein-ligated rat model: Role of prostaglandin. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(15): 2351-2356
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i15/2351.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i15.2351

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
         
                         
                         
                        