Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2006; 12(1): 82-88
Published online Jan 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i1.82
Published online Jan 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i1.82
Table 1 Demographics, clinical details and outcome of investigations performed in the 45 patients with chronic cough
All patients | GERD symptoms | ||
Present | Absent | ||
Subjects | 45 | 25 | 20 |
Age (mean±SD) | 54.5 ± 11.1 | 54.6 ± 12.8 | 54.4 ± 8.6 |
Gender, male (%) | 7 (15.5) | 3 (12.0) | 4 (20.0) |
Upper endoscopy positive (%) | 7 (15.5) | 3 (12.0) | 4 (20.0) |
pH-metry positive (%) | 26 (57.8) | 13 (52.0) | 13 (65.0) |
PPI test positive (%) | 23 (51.1) | 13 (52.0) | 10 (50.0) |
Table 2 Analysis of concordance between 24 h pH-metry and PPI test
24 h pH-metry | Total | ||
Positive | Negative | ||
PPI test positive | 12 | 11 | 23 |
PPI test negative | 14 | 8 | 22 |
Total | 26 | 19 |
Table 3 Characteristics of the patients entering the randomized double-blind phase of the study
Lansoprazole (30 mg/d)(n = 17) | Lansoprazole (60 mg/d)(n = 18) | |
Age (mean±SD) | 57.5 ± 11.9 | 52.4±10.0 |
Gender, male (% ) | 3 (17.6) | 2 (11.1) |
Upper endoscopy positive (%) | 4 (23.5) | 3 (16.7) |
pH-metry positive (%) | 13 (76.5) | 10 (55.5) |
PPI test positive (%) | 11 (64.7) | 11 (61.1) |
Table 4 Patient symptoms evaluated at baseline (visit 1), after the PPI test (visit 2) and at the end of the 12-week lansoprazole treatment period (visit 3)
Table 5 Comparison between patients with symptomatic response and non-responders
Responders [n = 21 (%)] | Non-responders [n = 14 (%)] | |
GER symptoms | 14 (66.7) | 5(35.7) |
Treatment with | 11 (52.4) | 7(50.0) |
60 mg/d lansoprazole | ||
Erosive esophagitis | 5 (23.8) | 2(14.3) |
pH-metry positive | 10 (47.6) | 13(92.8) |
PPI test positive | 18 (85.7) | 4(28.6)b |
- Citation: Baldi F, Cappiello R, Cavoli C, Ghersi S, Torresan F, Roda E. Proton pump inhibitor treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough: A comparison between two different daily doses of lansoprazole. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(1): 82-88
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i1/82.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i1.82