Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2005; 11(44): 6941-6947
Published online Nov 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i44.6941
Published online Nov 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i44.6941
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of 74 patients with esophageal cancer
| Numbers of patients | |
| Age (mean), years | 36-79 (59.5) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 71 |
| Female | 3 |
| Differentiation | |
| Well | 0 |
| Moderate | 49 |
| Poor | 25 |
| Tumor site | |
| T1 | 3 |
| T2 | 10 |
| T3 | 50 |
| T4 | 11 |
| Lymph node | |
| N0 | 24 |
| N1 | 50 |
| Metastasis | |
| M0 | 60 |
| M1 | 14 |
| Stage | |
| I | 2 |
| II | 25 |
| III | 33 |
| IV | 14 |
Table 2 Expression of telomerase activity according to the clinicopathological characteristics of 74 esophageal cancer patients
| Telomerase (+) | Telomerase (-) | P value1 | |
| Gender | 1.0 | ||
| Female | 3 | 0 | |
| Male | 60 | 11 | |
| Differentiation | 0.492 | ||
| Well to moderate | 20 | 5 | |
| Poor | 43 | 6 | |
| Tumor Size | 1.0 | ||
| T1+T2 | 11 | 2 | |
| T3+T4 | 52 | 9 | |
| Lymph node | 0.321 | ||
| N0 | 19 | 5 | |
| N1 | 44 | 6 | |
| Metastasis | 0.11 | ||
| M0 | 49 | 11 | |
| M1 | 14 | 0 | |
| Stage | 0.194 | ||
| I+II | 21 | 6 | |
| III+IV | 42 | 5 |
Table 3 Expression of telomerase associate genes of the tumor and normal tissues in 74 esophageal cancer patients
| Expression | Positive | Negative | P-values1 |
| TRF1 | 0.002 | ||
| Tumor | 61 | 13 | |
| Normal | 43 | 31 | |
| TRF2 | 1.0 | ||
| Tumor | 68 | 6 | |
| Normal | 67 | 7 | |
| c-Myc | 0.16 | ||
| Tumor | 70 | 4 | |
| Normal | 64 | 10 | |
| hTERT | 0.0002 | ||
| Tumor | 48 | 26 | |
| Normal | 24 | 50 | |
| hTERC | <0.0001 | ||
| Tumor | 59 | 14 | |
| Normal | 30 | 44 | |
| TP1 | N/A | ||
| Tumor | 74 | 0 | |
| Normal | 74 | 0 | |
| Tissue | 0.288 | ||
| Tumor | 63 | 11 | |
| Normal | 24 | 50 | <0.0001 |
Table 4 Expression of telomerase associate genes of the tumor tissues according to the telomerase activity in 74 esophageal cancer patients
Table 5 TRFL and t/n TRFLR of the tumor tissues according to the telomerase expression and TNM stages
| Variables | TRFL | P- values | t/n TRFLR | P- values |
| Tissues | <0.00011 | |||
| Normal | 4.93±1.74 kb | |||
| Tumor | 2.70±1.42 kb | |||
| Telomerase | 0.7671 | 0.7422 | ||
| Positive | 2.72±1.44 kb | 0.55±0.22 | ||
| Negative | 2.58±1.32 kb | 0.59±0.41 | ||
| Tumor stages | 0.9362 | 0.8672 | ||
| Stage I | 3.04±0.42 kb | 0.818±0.019 | ||
| Stage II | 2.65±1.44 kb | 0.686±0.184 | ||
| Stage III | 2.83±1.44 kb | 0.729±0.265 | ||
| Stage IV | 2.41±1.49 kb | 0.649±0.185 | ||
| Total | 2.70±1.42 kb | 0.73±0.24 |
Table 6 Multivariate survival analysis for Cox proportional hazards model
| Risk factors (# Patients) | Coefficients (SE) | Relative risk (95%CI) | P-values1 |
| t/n TRFLR | 0.78 (0.37) | (1.06-4.48) | 0.035 |
| ≤85% (n = 57) | 1 | ||
| >85% (n = 17) | 2.18 | ||
| T-status | 1.17 (0.78) | (0.70-15.06) | 0.134 |
| T1+T2 (n = 13) | 1 | ||
| T3+T4 (n = 61) | 3.24 | ||
| N-status | 1.06 (0.66) | (0.79-10.48) | 0.108 |
| N0 (n = 24) | 1 | ||
| N1+N2 (n = 50) | 2.88 | ||
| M-status | 0.87 (0.43) | (1.03-5.49) | 0.042 |
| M0 (n = 60) | 1 | ||
| M1 (n = 14 ) | 2.38 | ||
| Stage | -0.90 (0.78) | (0.09-1.89) | 0.251 |
| I+II (n = 27) | 1 | ||
| III+IV (n = 47) | 0.41 | ||
| Differentiation | 0.33 (0.35) | (0.70-2.76) | 0.352 |
| W+M (n = 25) | 1 | ||
| P (n = 49) | 1.39 | ||
| Telomerase expression | -0.11 (0.46) | (0.36-2.22) | 0.811 |
| Negative (n = 11) | 1 | ||
| Positive (n = 63) | 0.9 |
- Citation: Hsu CP, Lee LW, Shai SE, Chen CY. Clinical significance of telomerase and its associate genes expression in the maintenance of telomere length in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(44): 6941-6947
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i44/6941.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i44.6941
