Effect of acupuncture at different meridian acupoints on changes of related factors for rabbit gastric mucosal injury

doi:10.3748/wjg.v11.i41.6472

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 41

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3008)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

355

HTML

2426

Tables (1-5)

227

Sum=3008

Nov 7, 2005 (publication date) through Nov 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (12)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Basic Research

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2005; 11(41): 6472-6476
Published online Nov 7, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i41.6472

Table 1 Gastric mucosal injury index comparison (mean±SD)

Groups	n	GMII
NG	8	8.50±2.98^b
MG	8	24.88±6.29^d^f
YMG	8	10.88±3.23^b
SYG	8	19.38±3.66^d
JYG	8	20.38±4.03^d
TYG	8	14.62±3.20^a
TYMG	8	24.13±1.64^d^c

^aP <0.05,

^bP <0.01 vs MG;

^dP <0.01 vs YMG;

^cP <0.05,

^fP <0.01 vs TYG.

Table 2 NO and NOS changes in gastric mucosa (mean ± SD)

Groups	n	NO (μ mot/gprot)	NOS (u/mgprot)
NG	8	1.48 ± 0.54^b	2081.4 ± 482.6^b
MG	8	0.45 ± 0.20^d	762.1 ± 156.3^d^f
YMG	8	1.38 ± 0.27^b	1931.5 ± 612.6^b
SYG	8	0.45 ± 0.19^d	1327.0 ± 319.4^b^d^c
JYG	8	0.76 ± 0.25^d	987.2 ± 365.1^d^f
TYG	8	1.25 ± 0.68	1728.2 ± 213.2^b
TYMG	8	0.57 ± 0.24^d	750.9 ± 254.3^d^f

^aP <0.05,

^bP <0.01 vs MG;

^dP <0.01 vs YMG;

^cP <0.05,

^fP <0.01 vs TYG.

Table 3 PGE2 and EGF changes in gastric mucosa (mean±SD, ng/L)

Groups	n	PGE2	EGF
NG	8	2 624.8 ± 336.2^b	91.3 ± 14.9^b
MG	8	1 629.2 ± 406.7^d^f	73.6 ± 14.8^d
YMG	8	2 708.8 ± 526.2^b	92.2 ± 6.7^b
SYG	8	1 763.8 ± 371.5^d^f	74.9 ± 9.0^d
JYG	8	1 663.4 ± 258.0^d^f	72.7 ± 12.4^d
TYG	8	2 383.6 ± 547.5^b	68.5 ± 14.1^d
TYMG	8	1 748.6 ± 594.9^d^f	65.4 ± 12.8^d

^bP <0.01 vs MG;

^dP <0.01 vs YMG;

^fP <0.01 vs TYG.

Table 4 Summarization of effects on items after acupuncture therapy

Items	Order sequence
Items	1	2	3	4	5
GMII	YMG	TYG	SYG	JYG	TYMG
NO	YMG	TYG	JYG	TYMG	SYG
NOS	YMG	TYG	SYG	JYG	TYMG
EGF	YMG	SYG	JYG	TYG	TYMG
PGE2	YMG	TYG	SYG	TYMG	JYG

Order sequence refers to the effect intensity from strong to weak.

Table 5 Comprehensive protective effects of different meridian acupuncture on gastric mucosa (mean±SD)

Groups	n	WEV
NG	8	9 542.1±851.4^b
MG	8	5 298.5±963.8^d^f
YMG	8	9 653.5±1 064.7^b
SYG	8	6 344.6±1 013.8^d^f
JYG	8	5 660.7±919.4^d^f
TYG	8	8 391.1±1 466.1^b^d
TYMG	8	5 550.4±1 501.4^d^f

^bP <0.01 vs MG;

^dP <0.01 vs YMG;

^fP <0.01 vs TYG.

Citation: Yan J, Yang RD, He JF, Yi SX, Chang XR, Lin YP. Effect of acupuncture at different meridian acupoints on changes of related factors for rabbit gastric mucosal injury. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(41): 6472-6476
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i41/6472.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i41.6472