Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2005; 11(3): 323-326
Published online Jan 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.323
Published online Jan 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.323
Table 1 Demographic data of LRH and ORH groups, n (%).
Parameters | LRH (n = 30) | ORH (n = 34) | P |
Mean age (yr) | 60.18±14.91 | 60.00±12.67 | 0.97 |
>70 (%) | 10 (33.3) | 9 (26.5) | |
<70 (%) | 20 (66.7) | 25 (73.5) | 0.549 |
Gender (%) | |||
Male | 16 (53.3) | 20 (58.8) | |
Female | 14 (46.7) | 14 (41.2) | 0.659 |
Previous abdominal operation (%) | |||
Yes | 8 (26.7) | 10 (29.4) | |
No | 22 (73.3) | 24 (70.6) | 0.807 |
Tumor site (%) | |||
Cecum | 10 (33.3) | 6 (17.6) | |
Ascending colon | 12 (40) | 15 (44.1) | |
Hepatic flexure | 8 (26.7) | 13 (38.2) | 0.319 |
Dukes' stage (%) | |||
A | 1 (3.3) | 3 (8.8) | |
B | 13 (43.3) | 16 (47.1) | |
C | 16 (53.3) | 15 (44.1) | 0.578 |
Table 2 Comparison of surgical safety and postoperative recovery (mean±SD).
Parameters | LRH (n = 30) | ORH (n = 34) | P |
Surgery-related | |||
Operating time (min) | 152.65±28.29 | 147.25±27.50 | 0.561 |
Blood loss (mL) | 112.94±96.36 | 274.50±235.43 | 0.005 |
Postoperative recovery | |||
Analgesia requirement (%) | 14 (46.7) | 26 (76.5) | 0.014 |
Flatus (d) | 2.24±0.56 | 3.25±1.29 | 0.012 |
Time to resume normal diet | 5.65±2.40 | 7.30±2.72 | 0.06 |
Hospital stay (d) | 13.94±6.53 | 18.25±5.96 | 0.043 |
Time to resume early activity (d) | 3.94±1.64 | 5.45±1.82 | 0.013 |
Length of incision (cm) | 6.47±4.11 | 17.55±1.61 | <0.01 |
Major complications (%) | 5 (16.7) | 10 (29.4) | 0.23 |
Massive haemorrhage | 0 | 1 | |
Anastomotic leak | 0 | 1 | |
Pulmonary infection | 2 | 3 | |
Urinary tract infection | 0 | 1 | |
Wound infection | 2 | 4 | |
Ileus | 1 | 0 |
Table 3 Comparison of oncological clearance and follow-up results (mean±SD).
Parameters | LRH (n = 30) | ORH (n = 34) | t | P |
Oncological clearance | ||||
Length of specimen (cm) | 20.88±5.28 | 23.10±6.90 | 1.082 | 0.842 |
Lymph node yield | 11.24±8.02 | 9.75±6.04 | 0.343 | 0.734 |
Epicolic and paracolic lymph nodes | 6.82±4.72 | 7.35±4.60 | 1.39 | 0.173 |
Intermediate lymph nodes | 2.59±2.43 | 1.50±2.32 | 1.24 | 0.223 |
Principle lymph nodes | 1.82±2.53 | 0.90±2.00 | 1.031 | 0.31 |
Oncological results | ||||
Mean follow-up (mo) | 27.15±7.95 | 26.19±7.46 | 0.478 | 0.634 |
Local recurrence (%) | 2 (6.7) | 2 (5.9) | ||
Metachronous metastasis (%) | 4 (13.3) | 5 (14.7) | ||
Cumulative survival probability (%) | 76.5 | 74.04 | - | 0.851 |
Table 4 Comparison of expenditure for surgery and drugs (mean±SD).
Parameters | LRH (n = 30) | ORH (n = 34) | t | P |
Cost for operation (RMB) | 7810.70±1719.07 | 5018.92±845.62 | 6.417 | <0.01 |
Cost for drugs (RMB) | 3687.85±1977.42 | 5209.42±2212.37 | 2.188 | 0.035 |
Total cost (RMB) | 11498.54±2618.86 | 10228.34±2372.57 | 1.547 | 0.131 |
- Citation: Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, Li JW, Wang ML, Mao ZH, Hu YY, Dong F, Hu WG, Li DH, Zang L, Peng YF, Yu BM. Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(3): 323-326
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i3/323.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.323