Copyright
©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2005; 11(27): 4188-4193
Published online Jul 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i27.4188
Published online Jul 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i27.4188
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of study subjects
| Characteristics | Patients with | Controls | |
| UC | CD | ||
| Number of subjects | 108 | 79 | 200 |
| Age range (yr) | 14 - 83 | 17 - 75 | 20 - 60 |
| Age (mean±SD) | 44.0 ± 16.9b | 34.5 ± 12.7 | 32.5 ± 11.1 |
| Male/female (%) | 57 (52.8)/51 (47.2) 47 (59.5)/32 (40.5) 125 (62.5)/75 (37.5) | ||
Table 2 Distribution of CTLA4 polymorphic alleles among study subjects
| Polymorphic site | Allele | Number (%) of alleles in | Controls | |
| UC | CD | |||
| nt –318 | C | 192 (88.9) | 140 (88.6) | 362 (90.5) |
| T | 24 (11.1) | 18 (11.4) | 38 (9.5) | |
| nt +49 | A | 84 (38.9) | 59 (37.3) | 159 (39.8) |
| G | 132 (61.1) | 99 (62.7) | 241 (60.2) | |
| nt +6 230 | G | 158 (73.1) | 115 (72.8) | 278 (69.5) |
| A | 58 (26.9) | 43 (27.2) | 122 (30.5) | |
| (AT)n in 3’-UTR | (AT)7 | 107 (49.5) | 83 (52.5) | 205 (51.3) |
| (AT)15 | 45 (20.8) | 22 (13.9) | 82 (20.5) | |
| (AT)16 | 50 (23.1) | 35 (22.2) | 87 (21.8) | |
| (AT)17 | 3 (1.4) | 15 (9.5) | 16 (4.0) | |
| (AT)18 | 11 (5.1) | 1 (0.6) | 8 (2.0) | |
| (AT)20 | 0 | 2 (1.3) | 0 | |
| (AT)22 | 0 | 0 | 2 (0.5) | |
| Total number of alleles | 216 | 158 | 400 | |
Table 3 Distribution of CTLA4 genotypes among study subjects
| Polymorphic site | Genotype | Number (%) of subjects with genotype | Controls (n = 200) | |
| UC (n = 108) | CD (n = 79) | |||
| nt –318 | C/C | 84 (77.8) | 63 (79.8) | 163 (81.5) |
| C/T | 24 (22.2) | 14 (17.7) | 36 (18.0) | |
| T/T | 0 | 2 (2.5) | 1 (0.5) | |
| nt +49 | A/A | 14 (13) | 9 (11.4) | 33 (16.5) |
| A/G | 56 (51.8) | 41 (51.9) | 93 (46.5) | |
| G/G | 38 (35.2) | 29 (36.7) | 74 (37.0) | |
| nt +6 230 | G/G | 54 (50) | 39 (49.4) | 100 (50.0) |
| G/A | 50 (46.3) | 37 (46.8) | 78 (39.0) | |
| A/A | 4 (3.7) | 3 (3.8) | 22 (11.0) | |
| (AT)n in 3’-UTR | (AT)7/(AT)7 | 52 (48.1) | 41 (51.9) | 101 (50.5) |
| (AT)7/(AT)15 | 2 (1.9) | 1 (1.3) | 1 (0.5) | |
| (AT)7/(AT)16 | 1 (0.9) | 0 | 2 (1.0) | |
| (AT)15/(AT)15 | 16 (14.8 | 5 (6.3) | 31 (15.5) | |
| (AT)15/(AT)16 | 11 (10.2) | 9 (11.4) | 18 (9.0) | |
| (AT)15/(AT)17 | 0 | 2 (2.5) | 1 (0.5) | |
| (AT)16/(AT)16 | 18 (16.7) | 13 (16.4) | 30 (15.0) | |
| (AT)16/(AT)17 | 2 (1.9) | 0 | 6 (3.0) | |
| (AT)16/(AT)18 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | |
| (AT)17/(AT)17 | 0 | 6 (7.6) | 3 (1.5) | |
| (AT)17/(AT)18 | 1 (0.9) | 1 (1.3) | 3 (1.5) | |
| (AT)18/(AT)18 | 5 (4.6) | 0 | 2 (1.0) | |
| (AT)20/(AT)20 | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 0 | |
| (AT)22/(AT)22 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | |
Table 4 Number of subjects with or without “G” allele at the G+6230A SNP site of CTLA4
| Genotype | Number (%) of subjects with genotype | ||
| UC | CD | Control | |
| (n = 108) | (n = 79) | (n = 200) | |
| G/G+G/A | 104 (96.3) | 76 (96.2) | 178 (89) |
| A/A | 4 (3.7)a | 3 (3.8) | 22 (11) |
Table 5 Number of UC patients classified by clinical features
| Polymorphic site | Genotype | Number of patients | Age at onset (yr) | ||
| (n = 108, %) | <40 | ≥40 | |||
| C–318T | C/C | 84 (77.8) | 55 | 29 | |
| C/T | 24 (22.2) | 18 | 6 | ||
| T/T | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| A+49G | A/A | 14 (13.0) | 8 | 6 | |
| A/G | 56 (51.8) | 40 | 16 | ||
| G/G | 38 (35.2) | 25 | 13 | ||
| G+6230A | G/G | 54 (50.0) | 39 | 15 | |
| G/A | 50 (46.3) | 31 | 19 | ||
| A/A | 4 (3.7) | 3 | 1 | ||
| (AT)n in 3’-UTR | (AT)7/(AT)7 | 52 (48.1) | 33 | 19 | |
| (AT)7/(AT)x or others | 56 (51.9) | 40 | 16 | ||
| (Continued) | |||||
| Location | Colectomy | ||||
| Pancolitis | Left-sided colitis | Proctitis | Yes | No | |
| 42 | 29 | 13 | 7 | 77 | |
| 10 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 23 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 14` | |
| 28 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 53 | |
| 15 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 33 | |
| 20 | 27 | 7 | 6 | 48 | |
| 28 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 48 | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 31 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 51 | |
| 23 | 26 | 7 | 7 | 49 | |
Table 6 Number of CD patients classified by clinical features
| Polymorphic site | Genotype | Number of patients | Age at onset (yr) | ||||
| (n = 79, %) | <40 | ≥40 | |||||
| C–318T | C/C | 63 (79.8) | 54 | 9 | |||
| C/T | 14 (17.7) | 12 | 2 | ||||
| T/T | 2 (2.5) | 2 | 0 | ||||
| A+49G | A/A | 9 (11.4) | 8 | 1 | |||
| A/G | 41 (51.9) | 35 | 6 | ||||
| G/G | 29 (36.7) | 25 | 4 | ||||
| G+6230A | G/G | 39 (49.4) | 35 | 4 | |||
| G/A | 37 (46.8) | 30 | 7 | ||||
| A/A | 3 (3.8) | 3 | 0 | ||||
| (AT)n in 3'-UTR | (AT)7/(AT)7 | 41 (51.9) | 34 | 7 | |||
| (AT)7/(AT)x or others | 38 (48.1) | 34 | 4 | ||||
| (Continued) | |||||||
| Location of lesion | Operation | Fistula | |||||
| Ileocolon | Ileum | Colon | Yes | No | Presence | Absence | |
| 40 | 14 | 9 | 33 | 30 | 27 | 36 | |
| 11 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| 25 | 11 | 5 | 20 | 21 | 14 | 27 | |
| 21 | 2 | 6 | 19 | 10 | 18 | 11 | |
| 25 | 5 | 7 | 21 | 18 | 19 | 20 | |
| 25 | 8 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 18 | 19 | |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 27 | 10 | 4 | 24 | 17 | 19 | 22 | |
| 26 | 9 | 3 | 20 | 18 | 17 | 21 | |
Table 7 Relationship between genotype at the A+49G SNP site and presence/absence of fistula in CD patients
| Genotype | No. (%) of patients | |
| With fistula | Without fistula | |
| (n = 37) | (n = 42) | |
| A/A+A/G | 19 (51.4) | 31 (73.8) |
| G/G | 18 (48.6)a | 11 (26.2) |
- Citation: Machida H, Tsukamoto K, Wen CY, Narumi Y, Shikuwa S, Isomoto H, Takeshima F, Mizuta Y, Niikawa N, Murata I, Kohno S. Association of polymorphic alleles of CTLA4 with inflammatory bowel disease in the Japanese. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(27): 4188-4193
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i27/4188.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i27.4188
