Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2005; 11(20): 3112-3117
Published online May 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3112
Published online May 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3112
Table 1 Demographics and baseline characteristics of erosive esophagitis patients treated with esomeprazole or omeprazole (mean±SE).
Esomeprazole 40 mg n = 25 | Omeprazole 20 mg n = 23 | P | |
Age (yr) | 49.2±3.7 | 59.0±3.4 | 0.0596 |
Sex (male%) | 20 (80) | 18 (78.3) | 1.0000 |
Body weight (kg) | 68.4±2.4 | 70.9±2.5 | 0.4779 |
Height (cm) | 166.7±1.3 | 169.0±1.4 | 0.2096 |
Basal reflux symptoms (VAS) | |||
Heartburn | 29.4±5.7 | 23.6±5.9 | 0.2683 |
Nausea | 18.7±5.5 | 13.8±5.8 | 0.8520 |
Regurgitation | 29.8±6.1 | 24.5±6.4 | 0.3365 |
Vomiting | 14.0±4.7 | 8.8±4.9 | 0.5702 |
Belching | 47.0±6.0 | 25.2±6.3 | 0.0121 |
Dysphagia | 7.5±5.0 | 14.7±5.2 | 0.7421 |
Epigastric pain | 15.8±5.5 | 16.7±5.8 | 0.9223 |
LA grade of erosive esophagitis [n (%)] | 0.6617 | ||
A | 15 (60) | 11 (47.8) | |
B | 7 (28) | 7 (30.4) | |
C | 2 (8) | 2 (8.7) | |
D | 1 (4) | 3 (13.0) | |
Hp infection status | 10 (40) | 11 (47.8) | 0.5643 |
Table 2 Changes of reflux symptoms assessed on visual analog scale of studied patients 8 wk after esomeprazole or omeprazole treatment (mean±SE).
Reflux symptoms | Esomeprazole n = 22 | Omeprazole n = 22 | P |
Heartburn | -22.3±2.1 | -21.4±2.2 | 0.5453 |
Nausea | -11.9±2.2 | -12.7±2.4 | 0.8867 |
Regurgitation | -22.4±2.2 | -20.4±2.3 | 0.8598 |
Vomiting | -9.1±1.61 | -8.8±1.7 | 0.4438 |
Belching | -24.1±4.3 | -17.9±4.6 | 0.0113 |
Dysphagia | -8.4±1.4 | -6.5±1.5 | 0.8044 |
Epigastric pain | -10.6±2.0 | -11.1±2.1 | 0.1747 |
Table 3 Changed reflux symptoms of studied patients 8 wk after esomeprazole or omeprazole treatment (%).
Esomeprazole (n = 22) | Omeprazole (n = 20) | P | ||
Heartburn | Improved | 50.0 | 65.0 | 0.0993 |
No change | 50.0 | 25.0 | ||
Worse | 0.0 | 10 | ||
Regurgitation | Improved | 77.3 | 85.0 | 1.0000 |
No change | 18.2 | 15.0 | ||
Worse | 4.5 | 0.0 | ||
Dysphagia | Improved | 36.4 | 35.0 | 0.8697 |
No change | 63.6 | 60.0 | ||
Worse | 0.0 | 5 | ||
Epigastric pain | Improved | 27.3 | 50.0 | 0.1895 |
No change | 63.6 | 50.0 | ||
Worse | 9.1 | 0.0 | ||
Nausea | Improved | 22.7 | 35.0 | 0.5036 |
No change | 68.2 | 65.0 | ||
Worse | 9.1 | 0 | ||
Vomiting | Improved | 22.7 | 40.0 | 0.3200 |
No change | 77.3 | 60.0 | ||
Worse | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Belching | Improved | 54.5 | 45.0 | 0.8999 |
No change | 36.4 | 45.0 | ||
Worse | 9.1 | 10 |
Table 4 AE in studied patients 8 wk after esomeprazole or omeprazole treatment (ITT).
Esomeprazole (n = 25) n(%) | Omeprazole (n = 23) n (%) | P | |
Patient with at least one AE | 7 (28.0) | 6 (26.1) | 1.0000 |
Constipation | 2 (8.0) | 1 (4.4) | 1.0000 |
Dry skin | 1 (4.0) | 3 (13.0) | 0.3381 |
Diarrhea | 1 (4.0) | 1 (4.4) | 1.0000 |
Headache | 1 (4.0) | 1 (4.4) | 1.0000 |
Somnolence | 1 (4.0) | 1 (4.4) | 1.0000 |
Cellulites | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.4) | 0.4792 |
Bronchitis | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.4) | 0.4792 |
-
Citation: Chen CY, Lu CL, Luo JC, Chang FY, Lee SD, Lai YL. Esomeprazole tablet
vs omeprazole capsule in treating erosive esophagitis. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(20): 3112-3117 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i20/3112.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3112