Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2005; 11(20): 3091-3098
Published online May 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3091
Published online May 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3091
Number of subjects enrolled | Total 127 | Rabeprazole 63 | Esomeprazole 64 | P |
Gender (%) | ||||
Female | 62 (48.8) | 25 (39.7) | 37 (57.8) | P = 0.0511 |
Male | 65 (51.2) | 38 (60.3) | 27 (42.2) | |
Race (%) | ||||
Chinese | 101 (79.5) | 52 (82.5) | 49 (76.6) | P = 0.8721 |
Malay | 9 (7.1) | 4 (6.3) | 5 (7.8) | |
Indian | 15 (11.8) | 6 (9.5) | 9 (14.1) | |
Other | 2 (1.6) | 1 (1.6) | 1 (1.6) | |
Age (yr) | ||||
Mean (SD) | 38.9 (10.6) | 39.3 (11.2) | 38.4 (10.0) | P = 0.6292 |
History of GERD symptoms (yr) | ||||
Mean (SD) | 3.6 (4.5) | 3.2 (4.2) | 3.9 (4.7) | P = 0.3732 |
Tobacco use, N (%) | ||||
Yes | 11 (8.7) | 4 (6.3) | 7 (10.9) | P = 0.2431 |
No | 116 (91.3) | 59 (93.7) | 57 (89.1) | |
Alcohol use, N (%) | ||||
Yes | 20 (15.7) | 9 (14.3) | 11 (17.2) | P = 0.4861 |
No | 107 (84.3) | 54 (85.7) | 53 (82.8) | |
Previous medication for reflux disease | ||||
Yes | 77 (60.6) | 35 (55.6) | 42 (65.6) | P = 0.2791 |
No | 50 (39.4) | 28 (44.4) | 22 (34.4) | |
H pylori status | ||||
Positive | 50 | 24 (45.3) | 26 (44.0) | |
Negative | 62 | 29 (54.7) | 33 (56.0) | P = 0.953 |
(Not available | 15 | 10 | 5 |
Parameter | Rabeprazole 10 mg (d) | Esomeprazole 20 mg (d) | P | Result |
Primary efficacy variables | ||||
Time to 24-h symptom-free interval-HB | 8.5 d | 9 d | 0.265 | NS |
Time to 24-h symptom-free interval-RG | 6.0 d | 7.5 d | 0.405 | NS |
Secondary efficacy variables | ||||
Time to 48-h symptom-free interval-HB | 9.5 d | 8.5 d | 0.373 | NS |
Time to 48-h symptom-free interval-RG | 8.5 d | 11 d | 0.271 | NS |
W1-W4-satisfactory relief DT or NT-HB | >0.05 | NS | ||
W1-W4-satisfactory relief DT or NT-RG | >0.05 | NS | ||
W1-W4-satisfactory relief DT-HB & RG4 | 0.0454 | Rabeprazole superior4 | ||
W1-W4-complete relief DT or NT-HB | >0.05 | NS | ||
W1-W4-complete relief DT or NT-RG | >0.05 | NS | ||
W1-W4-belching | -0.41 | -0.42 | 0.631 | NS |
W1-W4-early satiety | -0.26 | -0.32 | 0.178 | NS |
W1-W4-bloating | -0.46 | -0.54 | 0.608 | NS |
W1-W4-nausea | -0.23 | -0.27 | 0.319 | NS |
W1-W4-vomiting | -0.34 | -0.21 | 0.808 | NS |
Symptom severity score-D1-5-DT HB | P<0.05 (D2-5)1 | P<0.05 (D3-5)1 | NS2 | |
Symptom severity score-D1-5-NT HB | P<0.05 (D2-5)1 | NS1 | NS3 | |
Symptom severity score-D1-5-DT RG | P<0.05 (D1-5)1 | P<0.05 (D1-5)1 | NS | |
Symptom severity score-D1-5-NT RG | P<0.05 (D5 only)1 | P<0.05 (D2 only)1 | NS | |
Patient’s global evaluation (%) | 96.4 | 87.9 | 0.823 | NS |
Antacid use-weekly average | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.887 | NS |
Antacid use-% antacid free | 85.7 | 84.9 | 0.848 | NS |
Safety | ||||
Adverse events | 22 | 18.2 | >0.05 | NS |
-
Citation: Fock K, Teo E, Ang T, Chua T, Ng T, Tan Y. Rabeprazole
vs esomeprazole in non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A randomized, double-blind study in urban Asia. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(20): 3091-3098 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i20/3091.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i20.3091