Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2005; 11(19): 2945-2948
Published online May 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2945
Published online May 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2945
Table 1 Patient characteristics.
| NoST | AST | ITBL | |
| n | 25 | 27 | 23 |
| m/f | 16/9 | 11/16 (P = 0.081) | 13/10 (P = 0.401) |
| Median age (yr) | 50 yr [33-63] | 54 yr [33-65] (P = 0.09) | 49 yr [27-63] (P = 0.94) |
| Type of LTx | OLTx = 17/25 | OLTx = 17/27 | OLTx = 20/23 |
| LDLTx = 5/25 | (P = 0.461) | (P = 0.111) | |
| Split = 3/25 | LDLTx = 7/27 (P = 0.431) | LDLTx = 3/23 (P = 0.401) | |
| Split = 3/27 (P = 0.701) | Split = 0/23 (P = 0.131) |
Table 2 Impact of indirect imaging tools on diagnosis of posttransplant biliary strictures.
| Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | |
| US-biliary congestion all | 63.9 | 91.0 | 92.0 | 60.6 |
| -biliary congestion AST | 68.4 | 91.0 | 86.7 | 76.9 |
| -biliary congestion ITBL | 58.8 | 91.0 | 83.3 | 74.1 |
| US-biliary stenosis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| US-concomitant biliary stones all | 22.0 | 97.0 | 66.7 | 82.5 |
| -stones AST | 0 | 97 | 0 | 91.7 |
| -stones ITBL | 0 | 97 | 0 | 94 |
| CT-biliary congestion all | 63.6 | 57.1 | 70.0 | 50.0 |
| -biliary congestion AST | 40.0 | 57.1 | 40.0 | 57.1 |
| -biliary congestion ITBL | 83.3 | 57.1 | 62.5 | 80.0 |
| CT-biliary stenosis | 10 | 0 | 0 | 43.75 |
| CT-concomitant biliary stones | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MR-biliary congestion all | 83.3 | 25.0 | 83.3 | 25.0 |
| -biliary congestion AST | 71.4 | 25.0 | 62.5 | 33.3 |
| -biliaty congestion ITBL | 88.9 | 25.0 | 72.7 | 50.0 |
| MR-biliary stenosis | 38.9 | 75 | 87.5 | 21.4 |
| MR-correct localisation of stenosis | 22 | 75 | 80 | 17.6 |
| MR-concomitant biliary stones all | 33.0 | 94 | 50 | 89 |
| -stones AST | 0 | 94 | ||
| -stones ITBL | 0 | 94 |
Table 3 Impact of biochemical cholestasis parameters on diagnosis of post-transplant biliary strictures1.
- Citation: Zoepf T, Maldonado-Lopez EJ, Hilgard P, Dechêne A, Malago M, Broelsch CE, Schlaak J, Gerken G. Diagnosis of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Which is the best tool? World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(19): 2945-2948
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i19/2945.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2945
