Gastric mucosal injury due to hemorrhagic reperfusion and efficacy of Salvia miltiorrhizae extract F and cimetidine

Table 1 Comparison of depth of gastric mucosal lesion among different groups (%, mean±SD).

Group	n	Damage grade
		0	1	2	3
NS	7	3.01±1.01	8.35±1.95	31.32±4.49	58.44±9.07
SEF	6	22.05±5.96b	34.12±8.12b	25.96±10.04	20.32±6.95b
		t = 8.434	t = 8.422		t = 8.386
		P = 0.000	P = 0.000		P= 0.000
CI	6	18.54±4.82b	30.15±7.12b	26.59±8.32	23.12±5.09b
		t = 7.950	t = 8.448		t = 8.411
		P = 0.000	P = 0.000		P = 0.000

^bP<0.01 vs NS group.

Table 2 Comparison of PGE₂, 6-keto-PGF_1α and TXB₂ concentrations in gastric mucosa among different groups (mean±SD).

Group	n	PGE2 (pg/mg)	6-keto-PGF1α (pg/mg)	TXB2 (pg/mg)	6-keto-PGF1a/TXB2
NS	6	540±183	714±124	58.28±6.74	17.38±5.93
SEF	6	760±192a	1248±158b	45.37±7.54a	33.42±9.24b
		t = 2.282	t = 6.583	t = 3.086	t = 3.963
		P = 0.046	P = 0.000	P = 0.014	P = 0.003
CI	6	581±168c	734±102d	54.32±6.89c	19.04±8.03d
		t = 2.265	t = 6.708	t = 2.265	t = 3.243
		P = 0.047	P = 0.000	P = 0.047	P = 0.009

^aP<0.05,

^bP<0.01 vs NS group;

^cP<0.05,

^dP<0.01 vs SEF group.