Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2005; 11(16): 2472-2476
Published online Apr 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2472
Published online Apr 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2472
Table 1 Patients’ characteristics (n = 8).
| Mean age | 52.12±18.26 |
| Female/male | 1/7 |
| Symptoms | |
| Right upper quadrant pain, palpable hepatic mass, flatulence | 8 |
| Cholestatic jaundice | 4 |
| Number of cysts | |
| 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 3 or more | 2 |
| Stages of cysts (According to Gharbi’s classification) Stage II | 3 |
| Stage III | 5 |
| Choledochal image at US and CT-scan dilated ( = 2 cm) | 3 |
| Normal | 5 |
Table 2 Objectives of the cysts and diagnostic investigations.
| Patient number | ALT, AST, ALP levels | Bilirubin levels (total/conj mg/dL) |
| 1 | High | 7/5 |
| 2 | N | N |
| 3 | N | N |
| 4 | N | N |
| 5 | High | 5/3 |
| 6 | High | 5/3 |
| 7 | High | 11/8 |
| 8 | N | N |
Table 3 Diagnosis and treatment of cystobiliary fistulae.
| Patient number | Clinical and diagnostic characteristics of the patients | Treatment of common bile duct |
| 1 | Evidence of obstructive jaundice with cystic contents in large CBD | Choledochoduodenostomy |
| 2 | Bile stained cystic liquid and visible orifice | Suturing orifice |
| 3 | Bile stained cystic liquid and visible orifice | Suturing orifice |
| 4 | Bile in cystic liquid | T-tube drainage |
| 5 | Evidence of obstructive jaundice, invisible orifice, normal caliber choledochus (postop biliary leakage) | Percutaneous drainage under US guidance post-operatively |
| 6 | Evidence of obstructive jaundice with cystic contents in a large CBD | Choledochoduodenostomy |
| 7 | Evidence of obstructive jaundice, hemobilia, enlargement of the CBD with cystic content | T-tube drainage |
| 8 | No suspicion of intrabiliary rupture | ERCP and sphincteroplasty |
- Citation: Erzurumlu K, Dervisoglu A, Polat C, Senyurek G, Yetim I, Hokelek M. Intrabiliary rupture: An algorithm in the treatment of controversial complication of hepatic hydatidosis. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(16): 2472-2476
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i16/2472.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2472
