Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2005; 11(13): 1971-1975
Published online Apr 7, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i13.1971
Published online Apr 7, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i13.1971
Table 1 Bowel movements per week for every patient and for the whole group. Application of the Wilcoxon’s test for paired samples.
| Pt. # | Baseline | Treatment | Increase % | ||
| BM/week | BM/week | ||||
| Average | SD | Average | SD | ||
| 1 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 2.9 | 0.29 | 119 |
| 2 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 6.6 | 1 | 394 |
| 3 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 3.3 | 0.65 | 150 |
| 4 | 2.7 | 0.58 | 6.9 | 1.31 | 159 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.79 | 192 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 3.9 | 1 | 292 |
| 7 | 2.0 | 1.00 | 3.8 | 0.83 | 92 |
| 8 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 3.7 | 0.65 | 175 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 3.4 | 0.79 | 242 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 308 |
| 11 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 4 | 1.13 | 200 |
| 12 | 1.7 | 0.58 | 3.3 | 0.87 | 95 |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 3.4 | 0.79 | 242 |
| 14 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 4.3 | 1.07 | 225 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 4.3 | 1.29 | 325 |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0.95 | 100 |
| 17 | 2 | 1 | 3.8 | 1.47 | 92 |
| 18 | 2.7 | 0.58 | 4.3 | 1.36 | 59 |
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 4.6 | 0.67 | 358 |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 4.2 | 0.39 | 317 |
| 21 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 3.6 | 0.67 | 169 |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 3.8 | 0.62 | 275 |
| 23 | 1.3 | 0.58 | 3.5 | 0.67 | 163 |
| 24 | 1 | 0.71 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 383 |
| 25 | 1.3 | 1.41 | 4.7 | 1.66 | 250 |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.29 | 192 |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.29 | 192 |
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.29 | 192 |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 200 |
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.29 | 192 |
| Average | 1.4 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 211 |
| P<5×10-7 | |||||
Table 2 Stool amount and consistency in baseline and treatment. Application of sign test.
| Pt. # | Stool consistency | Stool amount | ||
| Baseline | Treatment | Baseline | Treatment | |
| 1 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 2 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 3 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 4 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 5 | Hard | Hard | Low | Low |
| 6 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 7 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 8 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 9 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 10 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 11 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 12 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 13 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 14 | Hard | Soft | Low | 60% Regular |
| 15 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 16 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 17 | Hard | Soft | Low | Low |
| 18 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 19 | Hard | Soft | Low | 66% Regular |
| 20 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 21 | Hard | Soft | Low | 33% Regular |
| 22 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 23 | Hard | Soft | Low | 36% Regular |
| 24 | Hard | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 25 | Hard | Hard | Low | Regular |
| 26 | Soft | Soft | Low | 33% Regular |
| 27 | Soft | Soft | Low | 55% Regular |
| 28 | Soft | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 29 | Soft | Soft | Low | Regular |
| 30 | Soft | Soft | Low | 55% Regular |
| Better | 23 | 21 | ||
| Same | 7 | 9 | ||
| Worse | 0 | 0 | ||
| P | 1.3×10-5 | 4.0×10-6 | ||
Table 3 CTT results for day 4, 7 and their sum. Application of Student’s t-test for paired samples and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
| Markers count d 4 and 7 | Markers count d 7 | Markers count d 4 | |||||||
| B-L | Treatment | % | B-L | Treatment | % | B-L | Treatment | % | |
| Average CTT | 92.3 | 49.38 | 47 | 40.23 | 15.46 | 62 | 52.08 | 33.92 | 35 |
| SD | 32.35 | 31.30 | 17.71 | 19.0 | 16.14 | 17.47 | |||
| K-S d1 | 0.168 | 0.139 | 0.123 | 0.212 | 0.114 | 0.177 | |||
| K-S P2 | >0.2 | >0.2 | >0.2 | >0.2 | >0.2 | >0.2 | |||
| Lilliefors P | >0.2 | >0.2 | >0.2 | >0.1 | >0.2 | >0.2 | |||
| Student’s | |||||||||
| t-value | 5.239 | 5.228 | 3.317 | ||||||
| Student’s P | 0.000208 | 0.000212 | 0.00614 | ||||||
| Pearson’s r | 0.570 | 0.569 | 0.313 | ||||||
| Pearson’s P | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.298 | ||||||
- Citation: Mimidis K, Galinsky D, Rimon E, Papadopoulos V, Zicherman Y, Oreopoulos D. Use of a device that applies external kneading-like force on the abdomen for treatment of constipation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(13): 1971-1975
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i13/1971.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i13.1971
