Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 1, 2004; 10(5): 649-653
Published online Mar 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.649
Published online Mar 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.649
Table 1 Description of cases
| Age (yr) | |
| Median | 58 ± 14.1 |
| Range | 21-86 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 81 |
| Female | 18 |
| Modality of diagnosis | |
| Cytological/histological | 33 |
| Imaging + AFP > 400 ng/mL | 30 |
| Imaging + AFP < 400 ng/mL or unknown | 36 |
| Cirrhosis | |
| Absent | 5 |
| Present | 80 |
| Chronic parenchymalds’ | 14 |
| Causes of liver disease | |
| Hepatitis B | 58 |
| Hepatitis C | 22 |
| Hepatitis B + C | 5 |
| Non B and Non C | 6 |
| Alcoholic | 1 |
| Child-Pugh stage (unknown = 2) | |
| A | 43 |
| B | 33 |
| C | 21 |
| AFP (ng/mL) (unknown = 10) | |
| 10 < | 17 |
| 11-400 | 33 |
| 400 | 39 |
| Portal vein thrombosis (unknown = 3) | |
| No | 46 |
| Yes | 50 |
| Pre ThalidomideTreatment (unknown = 7) | |
| No | 30 |
| Yes | 72 |
| Surgery | 11 |
| PEI | 16 |
| TACE | 49 |
| Radiation | 6 |
| Chemotherpay | 3 |
Table 2 Okuda staging for HCC
| Point | 0 | 1 |
| Size of tumor | < 50% of liver | > 50 % |
| Ascites | No | Yes |
| Albumin | ≥ 3 | < 3 |
| Bilirubin | < 3 | ≥ 3 |
| Stage I: 0 | II: 1 or 2 | III: 3 or 4 |
Table 3 CLIP scoring system
| Scores Variables | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Child-pugh stage | A | B | C |
| Tumor morphology | Unninodular | Multinodular | Massive |
| and extension | and extension | or extension | |
| ≤ 50% | ≤ 50% | > 50% | |
| AFP | < 400 | ≥ 400 | |
| Portal vein thrombosis | No | Yes |
Table 4 Hepatocellular carcinoma stage and survival time, Okuda stage and survival time
| Group | Stage | MSD | |||
| I | II | III | |||
| A (n = 19) | Case No. | 5 | 9 | 5 | |
| Survival days | 161 | 26.8 | 10.5 | 25.2 | |
| B (n = 76) | Case No. | 19 | 41 | 16 | |
| Survival days | 171.5 | 136.5 | 47.3 | 108.5 | |
Table 5 Hepatocellular carcinoma stage and survival time, CLIP classification and survival time
| Group | Score | |||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| A (n = 20) | Case | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 1 |
| Survival days | 220.5 | 49 | 42 | 35 | 12.3 | 11 | ||
| B (n = 76) | Case | 1 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 9 | 3 |
| Survival days | > 345 | 301 | 150.5 | 106.8 | 96.2 | 59.5 | 19.3 | |
Table 6 Response rate of hepatoma treated with thalidomide
- Citation: Wang TE, Kao CR, Lin SC, Chang WH, Chu CH, Lin J, Hsieh RK. Salvage therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with thalidomide. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(5): 649-653
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i5/649.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.649
