Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2004.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Mar 1, 2004; 10(5): 649-653
Published online Mar 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.649
Published online Mar 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.649
            Table 1 Description of cases
        
    | Age (yr) | |
| Median | 58 ± 14.1 | 
| Range | 21-86 | 
| Sex | |
| Male | 81 | 
| Female | 18 | 
| Modality of diagnosis | |
| Cytological/histological | 33 | 
| Imaging + AFP > 400 ng/mL | 30 | 
| Imaging + AFP < 400 ng/mL or unknown | 36 | 
| Cirrhosis | |
| Absent | 5 | 
| Present | 80 | 
| Chronic parenchymalds’ | 14 | 
| Causes of liver disease | |
| Hepatitis B | 58 | 
| Hepatitis C | 22 | 
| Hepatitis B + C | 5 | 
| Non B and Non C | 6 | 
| Alcoholic | 1 | 
| Child-Pugh stage (unknown = 2) | |
| A | 43 | 
| B | 33 | 
| C | 21 | 
| AFP (ng/mL) (unknown = 10) | |
| 10 < | 17 | 
| 11-400 | 33 | 
| 400 | 39 | 
| Portal vein thrombosis (unknown = 3) | |
| No | 46 | 
| Yes | 50 | 
| Pre ThalidomideTreatment (unknown = 7) | |
| No | 30 | 
| Yes | 72 | 
| Surgery | 11 | 
| PEI | 16 | 
| TACE | 49 | 
| Radiation | 6 | 
| Chemotherpay | 3 | 
            Table 2 Okuda staging for HCC
        
    | Point | 0 | 1 | 
| Size of tumor | < 50% of liver | > 50 % | 
| Ascites | No | Yes | 
| Albumin | ≥ 3 | < 3 | 
| Bilirubin | < 3 | ≥ 3 | 
| Stage I: 0 | II: 1 or 2 | III: 3 or 4 | 
            Table 3 CLIP scoring system
        
    | Scores Variables | 0 | 1 | 2 | 
| Child-pugh stage | A | B | C | 
| Tumor morphology | Unninodular | Multinodular | Massive | 
| and extension | and extension | or extension | |
| ≤ 50% | ≤ 50% | > 50% | |
| AFP | < 400 | ≥ 400 | |
| Portal vein thrombosis | No | Yes | 
            Table 4 Hepatocellular carcinoma stage and survival time, Okuda stage and survival time
        
    | Group | Stage | MSD | |||
| I | II | III | |||
| A (n = 19) | Case No. | 5 | 9 | 5 | |
| Survival days | 161 | 26.8 | 10.5 | 25.2 | |
| B (n = 76) | Case No. | 19 | 41 | 16 | |
| Survival days | 171.5 | 136.5 | 47.3 | 108.5 | |
            Table 5 Hepatocellular carcinoma stage and survival time, CLIP classification and survival time
        
    | Group | Score | |||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| A (n = 20) | Case | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 
| Survival days | 220.5 | 49 | 42 | 35 | 12.3 | 11 | ||
| B (n = 76) | Case | 1 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 
| Survival days | > 345 | 301 | 150.5 | 106.8 | 96.2 | 59.5 | 19.3 | |
            Table 6 Response rate of hepatoma treated with thalidomide
        
    - Citation: Wang TE, Kao CR, Lin SC, Chang WH, Chu CH, Lin J, Hsieh RK. Salvage therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with thalidomide. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(5): 649-653
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i5/649.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.649

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
         
                         
                         
                        