Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 15, 2004; 10(4): 550-554
Published online Feb 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i4.550
Published online Feb 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i4.550
Table 1 Comparison between positive rate and positive unit (PU) of NDRG1 protein in all groups
Group | Cases | Positive number and percentage | Positive unit mean ± SD | ||||
- | + | ++ | +++ | % | |||
Normal colorectal mucosa | 38 | 17 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 55.26 | 45.34 ± 5.66 |
Colorectal adenomas | 31 | 6 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 80.65 | 48.35 ± 4.79 |
Non-metastatic CRCs | 45 | 2 | 24 | 19 | 0 | 95.56 | 51.62 ± 4.63 |
Metastatic CRCs | 38 | 0 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 100.00 | 54.38±4.39 |
Regional lymph node metastatic sites | 38 | 2 | 9 | 24 | 3 | 94.74 | 54.73 ± 4.56 |
Table 2 Comparison of positive rates of NDRG1 protein in all groups (P value)
Group | Normal colorectal mucosa | Colorectal adenomas | Non-metastatic CRCs | Metastatic CRCs | Regional lymph node metastatic sites |
Normal colorectal mucosa | —— | bP < 0.01 | bP < 0.01 | bP < 0.01 | bP < 0.01 |
Colorectal adenomas | bP < 0.01 | —— | cP < 0.05 | dP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 |
Non-metastatic CRCs | bP < 0.01 | cP < 0.05 | —— | eP < 0.05 | fP < 0.01 |
Metastatic CRCs | bP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 | eP < 0.05 | —— | |
Regional lymph node metastatic sites | bP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 | fP < 0.01 | —— |
Table 3 Comparison of positive units (PU) of NDRG1 protein in all groups (P value)
Group | Normal colorectal mucosa | Colorectal adenomas | Non-metastatic CRCs | Metastatic CRCs | Regional lymph node metastatic sites |
Normal colorectal mucosa | —— | aP < 0.05 | bP < 0.01 | bP < 0.01 | bP < 0.01 |
Colorectal adenomas | aP < 0.05 | —— | dP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 |
Non-metastatic CRCs | bP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 | —— | eP < 0.05 | fP < 0.01 |
Metastatic CRCs | bP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 | eP < 0.05 | —— | |
Regional lymph node metastatic sites | bP < 0.01 | dP < 0.01 | fP < 0.01 | —— |
Table 4 Correlation between expression of NDRG1 and lymph node metastasis in CRCs
Expression of NDRG1 | LN (-) | LN (+) |
- | 2 | 0 |
+ | 24 | 14 |
++ | 19 | 18 |
+++ | 0 | 6 |
P value | < 0.01 | |
Spearman correlation coefficient | 0.329 |
Table 5 Association of clinicopathologic variables with NDRG1 expression in CRCs
No. of cases | - | + | ++ | +++ | |
Sex | |||||
Male | 51 | 1 | 26 | 20 | 4 |
Female | 32 | 1 | 12 | 17 | 2 |
Age (years) | |||||
< 55 | 41 | 1 | 18 | 18 | 4 |
≥ 55 | 42 | 1 | 20 | 19 | 2 |
Histological differentiation | |||||
High differentiation | 23 | 2 | 10 | 11 | 0 |
Moderate differentiation | 47 | 0 | 23 | 20 | 4 |
Poor differentiation | 13 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
- Citation: Wang Z, Wang F, Wang WQ, Gao Q, Wei WL, Yang Y, Wang GY. Correlation of N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 overexpression with progressive growth of colorectal neoplasm. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(4): 550-554
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i4/550.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i4.550