Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2004; 10(16): 2444-2446
Published online Aug 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2444
Published online Aug 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2444
Diagnosis (No.of patients) | EUS findings | |||||
Size (mm) | Shape | Border | Layer of origin | Echogenicity | Internal echo | |
Lipoma (n = 12) | 15 ± 3.1 | Round | Regular | Third | Hyperechoic | Homogeneous |
Leiomyoma (n = 8) | 17 ± 4.3 | Round | Regular | Fourth | Hypoechoic | Homogeneous |
Lymphangioma (n = 6) | 14 ± 2.3 | Round | Regular | Third | Anechoic | Multilocular |
Leiomyosarcoma (n = 2) | 38 ± 2.8 | Round Lobulated | Regular | Fourth | Hypoechoic | Inhomogeneous |
Carcinoid (n = 3) | 14 ± 4.2 | Round | Regular | Third | Hypoechoic | Homogeneous |
Malignant lymphoma (n = 2) | Irregular | Irregular | Second to fourth | Hypoechoic | Inhomogeneous | |
Pneumatosis cystoid intestinalis (n = 2) | 17 ± 3.6 | Irregular | Irregular | Third | Hypoechoic | Inhomogeneous |
- Citation: Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Zhong YS, He GJ, Xu MD, Qin XY. Role of endoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography in diagnosis of submucosal tumor of large intestine. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(16): 2444-2446
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i16/2444.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2444