Brief Reports Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2003; 9(8): 1866-1870
Published online Aug 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i8.1866
Early protective effect of ischemic preconditioning on small intestinal graft in rats
Shu-Feng Wang, Department of General Surgery, First Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shannxi Province, China
Guo-Wei Li, Department of General Surgery, Second Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, Shannxi Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.30271275
Correspondence to: Dr. Shu-Feng Wang, Department of General Surgery, First Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shannxi Province, China. dawnwsf@sina.com
Telephone: +86-29-5271909
Received: January 18, 2003
Revised: January 26, 2003
Accepted: March 10, 2003
Published online: August 15, 2003

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the early protective effect of ischemic preconditioning on small intestinal graft in rats.

METHODS: SD rats were randomly divided into the following groups: sham operation group (S group, n = 6), small bowel transplantation group (SBT group, n = 12), ischemic preconditioning plus small bowel transplantation group (ISBT group, n = 12). Heterotopic SBT was performed with a technique modified from that described by Monchik et al When the graft was revascularized successfully and reperfused for 1 h, samples were obtained from the different groups. Laminin was analyzed with immunohistochemical staining. Quantitative analysis of laminin positive signals was performed using image acquiring analysis system. Apoptotic epithelia of small intestinal graft were detected by the TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling method. The morphological change of epithelial basement membrane was observed by transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS: The mean optical density value of laminin positive signals was 39.52 ± 2.60, 13.53 ± 0.44, 25.40 ± 1.79, respectively, in S, SBT and ISBT groups. The average optical density value of laminin positive products in SBT group was sharply lower than that in S group (P < 0.05). However, the mean optical density value of laminin positive products in ISBT group was significantly higher than that in SBT group (P < 0.05). The apoptotic index (AI) in S, SBT and ISBT group was 2.2 ± 0.83,30.8 ± 3.2, 13.2 ± 2.86, respectively. The AI in SBT group was significantly higher than that in S group (P < 0.05), and AI in ISBT group was sharply lower than that in SBT group (P < 0.05). On transmission electron microscopy, the epithelial basement membrane in S group stayed normal, but in SBT group it became disrupted and collapsed, even disappeared. The lesion of epithelial basement membrane in ISBT group was slighter compared with that in SBT group.

CONCLUSION: Ischemic preconditioning has an early protective effect on epithelial cells and extracellur matrix of small intestinal graft. Inhibition of epithelial cell apoptosis may be one of the mechanisms of ischemic preconditioning.




INTRODUCTION

Small bowel transplantation (SBT) has been advocated as the preferred therapy for patients with irreversible intestinal failures such as short bowel syndrome[1-6]. In recent years, although potent immunosuppressive agents have been used, rejection rate of small intestinal grafts still amounts to 50%[7]. Primary graft rejection and reperfusion damage involved in loss of small intestine function after transplantation are still the major obstacle to SBT[8-10]. Postischemic reperfusion damage, a nonspecific injury, may enhance graft immunogenicity and is likely to play an important role in the development of early specific and late rejection-related events, and threatens graft function and graft survival[11]. Therefore, it has important clinical significance for SBT if reperfusion injury of the graft could be ameliorated or prevented.

Studies have indicated that ischemic preconditioning can alleviate reperfusion injury of tissues or organs. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) refers to a phenomenon in which a tissue is rendered resistant to the deleterious effects of prolonged ischemia and reperfusion by prior exposure to brief periods of vascular occlusion[12]. With regard to organ transplantation, the beneficial effect of IPC has been previously described in transplantation procedures involving in ameliorating heart preservation injury and liver reperfusion damage[13,14], but its protective capacity against reperfusion injury in small bowel transplantation has not completely defined. Lately, Sola et al[15]. have shown that the release of lactate dehydrogenase (marker of cell injury) decreases markedly during small intestinal graft preservation and reperfusion, and morphological change of graft improves greatly, after IPC was carried out. Extracelluar matrix is the early target of reperfusion injury[16]. Epithelial cell apoptosis of small intestinal graft is the major mode of cell death[17]. But no study has covered the effect of IPC on them. So this study was to investigate the protective effect of ischemic preconditioning on epithelial cells and extracelluar matrix of intestinal graft in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal preparation

Healthy male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, weighing 280 ± 20 g, provided by Medical Experiment Animal Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University, were housed in standard animal facilities and fed with commercially available rat chow and tap water ad libitum for 1 week before test to acclimatize the laboratory. They were maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle.

Experimental design

SD rats were used as donors and recipients. They were randomly divided into the following groups: (1) sham operation group (S group, n = 6), in which animals were only subjected to anesthesia and laparotomy; (2) heterotopic segmental small bowel transplantation group (SBT group, n = 12), in which the donor and recipient were paired according to the similar body weight; (3) IPC plus SBT group (ISBT group, n = 12). IPC was carried out before the graft was harvested. Namely, the superior mesenteric artery was occluded for 10 min with a microsurgical atraumatic vascular clamp, then it was released, and the graft was reperfused for 10 min. The following surgical procedures were the same as SBT group.

Heterotopic small bowel transplantation

Heterotopic SBT was performed with a technique modified from that described by Monchik and others scholars[18-21]. All animals were fasted for 12 h, but had free access to water before operation. They were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium solution (2%, 35 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. After perfused in situ with cold lactated Ring’s solution, the small intestine 5 cm distal to the Treitz ligament was harvested from donor rat with a vascular pedicle including portal vein (PV) and aorta segment with superior mesenteric artery, and stored at 4 °C in lactated Ringer’s solution for 1 h. After left nephrectomy, left renal vein and abdominal aorta of the recipient were isolated. The graft was revascularized by end-to-side anastomosis between donor aorta and recipient aorta using continuous 9-0 non-traumatic nylon suture and end-to-end anastomosis between donor PV and the left renal vein of the recipient using a cuff technique. The recipient’s own intestine was left intact. During transplantation, mean warm ischemia time of graft was 25-30 min, and the longest did not exceed 40 min[22].

Immuohistochemical staining and evaluation

When the graft was revascularized successfully and reperfused for 1 h, samples were obtained from the different groups. Specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embeded in paraffin, sliced 4 μm thick, and stained by the SP methods. A polyclonal antirat laminin antibody (Boster Biotech, Wuhan, China) was used at concentration of 1:100. DAB was used for visualization. For negative control, the slides were treated with PBS instead of primary antibody.

Laminin is one of the major components of epithelial basement membrane. It was regarded as positive signals when epithelial basement membrane became brownish yellow. Quantitative analysis of positive products was performed using image acquiring analysis system (Leica QWin500CW, Germany). The image system randomly selected five visual fields per slice to measure the optical density value, using the average value as the mean optical density.

Detection of cell apoptosis

Apoptosis was detected on sections from paraformaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded blocks by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase (TdTase) mediated d-UTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) method[23]. Apoptosis assay with a detection kit from Bochinger Mannheim Germany, conformed to the manufacturer’s protocol strictly. The nuclei of apoptotic cells were stained brown as detected under light microscope, and apoptotic cells were quantified by calculating the apoptotic index (apoptotic cells/10 high-power fields)[24]. Negative control was designed by PBS instead of TdTase.

Transmission electron microscopy

For transmission electron microscopy, intestinal fragments of approximately 2 mm3 obtained from different groups, were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 3 h, rinsed in PBS, then postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. Samples were dehydrated in graded alcohols, and embedded in Epon 812, cut on an ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Ultrathin sections were viewed using transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi H-600).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for multiple comparisons with Student Newman Keylls (SNK) test. Significant difference was assumed when P < 0.05.

RESULTS
Quantitative analysis of laminin expression in different groups

As seen from Table 1, the mean optical density value of laminin positive products in SBT group was sharply lower than that in S group (P < 0.05). However, after IPC was carried out, the mean optical density value of positive products in ISBT group was higher, compared with that in SBT group (P < 0.05). It indicated that IPC had a protective effect on the basement membrane, one of the components of extracelluar matrix.

Table 1 Expression of laminin in different groups.
GroupnMean optical density value
S639.52 ± 2.60
SBT613.53 ± 0.44a
ISBT625.40 ± 1.79b
Cell apoptosis in different groups

As shown in Figure 1 and Table 2 in S group, apoptotic epithelial cells at villus tip were found only occasionally. However, after the graft underwent 60 min of cold ischemia and 60 min of warm reperfusion, many apoptotic cells appeared at villus tip of the graft in SBT group, The AI in SBT groups was significantly higher than that in S group (P < 0.05), but the number of apoptotic cells at villus tip of the graft decreased sharply after transient IPC was carried out. The AI in ISBT group was sharply lower than that in SBT group (P < 0.05). It showed that the mechanism of IPC was also involved in inhibition of epithelial cell apoptosis induced by ischemia and reperfusion in small intestinal graft.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Light micrographs of apoptotic cells detected by TUNEL method (original magnification ×400). A: In S group, TUNEL signals were only observed accidentally at villi tip. B: In SBT group, many TUNEL signals appeared at villi tip of the graft. C: In ISBT group, after IPC was carried out, TUNEL signals decreased significantly at villi tip of the graft.
Table 2 AI of epithelial cells of small intestinal graft in different groups.
GroupnAI
S62.2 ± 0.83
SBT630.8 ± 3.2a
ISBT613.2 ± 2.86b
Morphological analysis of epithelial basement membrane

Under light microscope, epithelial basement membrane was stained brownish yellow in S, SBT and ISBT groups, but there was an obvious difference in the structure of epithelial basement membrane. Basement membrane in S group showed line-shaped continuous normal structure, however, it became disrupted and collapsed, even disappeared in SBT group. The lesion of basement membrane in ISBT group was slighter compared with that in SBT group. Under transmission electron microscope, the morphological change of epithelial basement membrane was the same as that under light microscopy (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Light and electron micrographs (LM and EM) of morphological change of epithelial basement membrane (BM) (LM, original magnification ×400, EM, original magnification ×20000). D and E: In S group, BM showed line-shaped, continuous normal structure. F and G: In SBT group, BM became disrupted and collapsed, even disappeared. H and I: In ISBT group, after IPC was function carried out, the lesion of BM was slighter, compared with that in SBT group.
DISCUSSION

Available evidences indicate that the small intestinal mucosa is susceptible to postischemic reperfusion, 15 minutes of ischemia alone could induce detectable mucosal injury, and reperfusion exacerbates the mucosal injury[25]. Under physiological conditions, the gut shows a remarkable rate of turnover, and a rapid regeneration of the epithelial layer has also been reported after intestinal hypoxia/reperfusion. Taguchi et al[26] have found that 15 minutes of ischemia and 1 h reperfusion could result in increase of the expression of proliferation cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in small intestine. PCNA, a kind of nuclear protein that produces or expresses in proliferative cells, is a significant cell-regulated nuclear protein for DNA-polymerase δ. So PCNA is a marker for proliferative cells[27-29]. The increase of small intestinal PCNA expression after 1 h reperfusion indicates that the repair process of epithelia is initiated by ischemia and reperfusion. In order to discover the deleterious effect of reperfusion and protective effect of IPC, respectively, on epithelia and extracelluar matrix of the small intestinal graft, and to prevent influence on graft due to the recovery of epithelia during reperfusion, the present study was designed to obtain specimens from different groups 1 h after reperfusion when the vascular anastomosis had finished.

The protective effect of IPC was first described in heart[30], and many comprehensive studies on IPC indicated that it could be divided into two major classes. One is the early phase of protection that appears 1-3 h after IPC, and the other is the late phase of protection that appears 24 h after IPC (the second window of protection). Lately, this protective effect has been also demonstrated in the small intestine[31]. Although the effects of IPC on small intestine are not completely understood, several studies suggested that they were involved in transient increase of nitric oxide synthesis, activation of KATP channel, release of calcitonin gene-related peptide and endogenous opioid peptides, and inhibition of P-selectin expression in small intestine[32-36]. Apoptosis regulates many physiological and pathological processes. The influence of IPC on cell apoptosis in small bowel graft is not well known. Apoptosis is a major mode of epithelial death and peaks at 60 min during reperfusion period, in comparison, necrosis was relatively minor[37,38]. Therefore, loss of intestinal epithelia is a consequence of apoptosis during reperfusion. In the present experiment, apoptotic epithelial cells at villus tip were found accidentally in S group. Under physiological circumstances, apoptosis was reported to be an important mechanism of epithelial cell renewal. However, in SBT group after the graft underwent 60 min of cold ischemia and 60 min of warm reperfusion, many apoptotic cells appeared at villus tip of the graft. Compared with S group, the number of apoptotic cells was significantly higher. It indicated that apoptosis was initiated by ischemia and reperfusion in the graft. But in ISBT group, after transient IPC was carried out, the number of apoptotic cells at villus tip of the graft decreased sharply, in comparison with that in SBT group. It suggests that the mechanism of IPC may also involve the inhibition of epithelial cell apoptosis induced by ischemia and reperfusion in small intestinal graft.

Extracelluar matrix proteins provide structural support and maintenance, and also modulate a number of cell functions such as repair and immunity[39]. Laminin, an active glycoprotein with many biological functions, is one of the most abundant components of epithelial basement membrane[40]. It may play an important role in regulating cell-cell interactions, cell migration and differentiation. Laminin can be produced by epithelial and endothelial cells. In the present study, after laminin expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining and analyzed by quantitative analysis system, it was found that intestinal epithelial basement membrane in S group appeared line-shaped continuous structure, but it became decomposed and disrupted, even disappeared in SBT group. Compared with the average optical density value of laminin positive expression signals in S group, it was significantly lower in SBT group. Hence, it proved again that epithelial basement membrane was an early target of reperfusion injury. The small bowel contains a large reservoir of mediators, such as reactive oxygen radicals, various protease and cytokines, as well as adhesion molecules[41]. During reperfusion, laminin regulates polymorphonuclear cells to adhere and migrate to epithelial villus, and it is reactive oxygen radicals and various proteases released from polymorphonuclear cells that decompose epithelial basement membrane, meanwhile reperfusion injury damages the ability of epithelial cells to produce laminin. So, more damage and less production result in the collapse of epithelial basement membrane. In accordance with immunohistochemical results, under transmission electron microscopy, intestinal epithelial basement membrane in S group kept normal, but it showed disruption, even disappeared in SBT group. After IPC, the morphological change of epithelial basement membrane in ISBT group improved greatly, and the mean optical density value of laminin positive expression signals became higher, compared with that in SBT group. Under transmission electron microscope, the reperfusion injury degree of basement membrane in ISBT group was slighter than that in SBT group. It indicates strongly that IPC has protective effects on extracelluar matrix of small intestinal graft, and the beneficial effect may appear at early phase after IPC.

In summary, the present study demonstrates that ischemic preconditioning has an early protective effect on epithelial cells and extracelluar matrix of small intestinal graft. Inhibition of epithelial cell apoptosis initiated by reperfusion may be one of the mechanisms of IPC. With regard to organ transplantation, IPC may have a substantial impact on clinical practice. Alleviation of reperfusion injury of graft by IPC can enhance the function grafts and prolong their survival.

Footnotes

Edited by Zhang JZ and Wang XL

References
1.  Platell CF, Coster J, McCauley RD, Hall JC. The management of patients with the short bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:13-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Kato T, Ruiz P, Thompson JF, Eskind LB, Weppler D, Khan FA, Pinna AD, Nery JR, Tzakis AG. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. World J Surg. 2002;26:226-237.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 100]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Park BK. Intestinal transplantation in pediatric patients. Prog Transplant. 2002;12:97-113; quiz 114-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Kaufman SS. Small bowel transplantation: selection criteria, operative techniques, advances in specific immunosuppression, prognosis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2001;13:425-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Dionigi P, Alessiani M, Ferrazi A. Irreversible intestinal failure, nutrition support, and small bowel transplantation. Nutrition. 2001;17:747-750.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Reyes J. Intestinal transplantation for children with short bowel syndrome. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2001;10:99-104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Ghanekar A, Grant D. Small bowel transplantation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;7:133-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Farmer DG, Amersi F, Shen XD, Gao F, Anselmo D, Ma J, Dry S, McDiarmid SV, Shaw G, Busuttil RW. Improved survival through the reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury after rat intestinal transplantation using selective P-selectin blockade with P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-Ig. Transplant Proc. 2002;34:985.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Guo WH, Chan KL, Fung PP, Chan KW, Tam PK. Nitric oxide protects segmental intestinal grafts from ischemia and reperfusion injury. Transplant Proc. 2000;32:1297-1298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Carey HV, Mangino MJ, Southard JH. Changes in gut function during hibernation: implications for bowel transplantation and surgery. Gut. 2001;49:459-461.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Massberg S, Messmer K. The nature of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:4217-4223.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Sola A, Roselló-Catafau J, Alfaro V, Pesquero J, Palacios L, Gelpí E, Hotter G. Modification of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in response to nitric oxide in intestinal preconditioning. Transplantation. 1999;67:1446-1452.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Karck M, Rahmanian P, Haverich A. Ischemic preconditioning enhances donor heart preservation. Transplantation. 1996;62:17-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Yin DP, Sankary HN, Chong AS, Ma LL, Shen J, Foster P, Williams JW. Protective effect of ischemic preconditioning on liver preservation-reperfusion injury in rats. Transplantation. 1998;66:152-157.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 148]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 154]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Sola A, De Oca J, González R, Prats N, Roselló-Catafau J, Gelpí E, Jaurrieta E, Hotter G. Protective effect of ischemic preconditioning on cold preservation and reperfusion injury associated with rat intestinal transplantation. Ann Surg. 2001;234:98-106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Mueller AR, Platz KP, Heckert C, Häusler M, Guckelberger O, Schuppan D, Lobeck H, Neuhaus P. Extracellular matrix: an early target of preservation/reperfusion injury and acute rejection after small bowel transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:2569-2571.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Shah KA, Shurey S, Green CJ. Characterization of apoptosis in intestinal ischaemia-reperfusion injury--a light and electron microscopic study. Int J Exp Pathol. 1997;78:355-363.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Monchik GJ, Russell PS. Transplantation of small bowel in the rat: technical and immunological considerations. Surgery. 1971;70:693-702.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Wu XT, Li JS, Zhao XF, Zhuang W, Feng XL. Modified techniques of heterotopic total small intestinal transplantation in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:758-762.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Li YX, Li JS, Li N. Improved technique of vascular anastomosis for small intestinal transplantation in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2000;6:259-262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Li YX, Li JS, Li N. Surgical technique for intestinal transplantation in rats. Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 1998;6:667-669.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Giele HP, Heel KA, Storrie A, McCauley RD, Hall JC. Warm ischaemia time in a model for small bowel transplantation. Microsurgery. 1996;17:438-443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Wu MY, Liang YR, Wu XY, Zhuang CX. Relationship between Egr-1 gene expression and apoptosis in esophageal carcinoma and precancerous lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:971-975.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Farber A, Connors JP, Friedlander RM, Wagner RJ, Powell RJ, Cronenwett JL. A specific inhibitor of apoptosis decreases tissue injury after intestinal ischemia-reperfusion in mice. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:752-760.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Noda T, Iwakiri R, Fujimoto K, Matsuo S, Aw TY. Programmed cell death induced by ischemia-reperfusion in rat intestinal mucosa. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:G270-G276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Taguchi T, Shima Y, Nakao M, Fujii Y, Tajiri T, Ogita K, Suita S. Activation of immediate early genes in relation to proliferation and apoptosis of enterocytes after ischemia-reperfusion injury of small intestine. Transplant Proc. 2002;34:983.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Zhao ZQ, Liu FL, Zhang L. Expressions of C-fos PCNA and Bax in intestine after ischemia and in dogs. Shijie Huaren Xiahua Zazhi. 2001;9:1021-1026.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Luo YQ, Ma LS, Zhao YL, Wu KC, Pan BR, Zhang XY. Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in polyps from large intestine. World J Gastroenterol. 1999;5:160-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Prelich G, Tan CK, Kostura M, Mathews MB, So AG, Downey KM, Stillman B. Functional identity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and a DNA polymerase-delta auxiliary protein. Nature. 1987;326:517-520.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 773]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 823]  [Article Influence: 22.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74:1124-1136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5406]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5494]  [Article Influence: 144.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Aksöyek S, Cinel I, Avlan D, Cinel L, Oztürk C, Gürbüz P, Nayci A, Oral U. Intestinal ischemic preconditioning protects the intestine and reduces bacterial translocation. Shock. 2002;18:476-480.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Vlasov TD, Smirnov DA, Nutfullina GM. Preconditioning of the small intestine to ischemia in rats. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2002;32:449-453.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Yang SP, Hao YB, Wu YX, Dun W, Shen LH, Zhang Y. Ischemic preconditioning mediated by activation of KATP channels in rat small intestine. Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao. 1999;20:341-344.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Dun Y, Hao YB, Wu YX, Zhang Y, Zhao RR. Protective effects of nitroglycerin-induced preconditioning mediated by calcitonin gene-related peptide in rat small intestine. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;430:317-324.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Zhang Y, Wu YX, Hao YB, Dun Y, Yang SP. Role of endogenous opioid peptides in protection of ischemic preconditioning in rat small intestine. Life Sci. 2001;68:1013-1019.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Davis JM, Gute DC, Jones S, Krsmanovic A, Korthuis RJ. Ischemic preconditioning prevents postischemic P-selectin expression in the rat small intestine. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:H2476-H2481.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Ikeda H, Suzuki Y, Suzuki M, Koike M, Tamura J, Tong J, Nomura M, Itoh G. Apoptosis is a major mode of cell death caused by ischaemia and ischaemia/reperfusion injury to the rat intestinal epithelium. Gut. 1998;42:530-537.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 218]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 231]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Fukuyama K, Iwakiri R, Noda T, Kojima M, Utsumi H, Tsunada S, Sakata H, Ootani A, Fujimoto K. Apoptosis induced by ischemia-reperfusion and fasting in gastric mucosa compared to small intestinal mucosa in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:545-549.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Fujisaki S, Kimizuka K, Park E, Tomita R, Fukuzawa M, Matsumoto K. Immunohistochemical analysis in the extracellular matrix during acute rejection of small bowel grafts in rats. Transplant Proc. 2000;32:1316-1317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Liu CQ, Ye JX, Jin B. Components of the extracelluarr matrix. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2002;10:53-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Mueller AR, Platz KP, Heckert C, Häusler M, Schuppan D, Lobeck H, Neuhaus P. Differentiation between preservation reperfusion injury and acute rejection after small bowel transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:2657-2659.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]