Published online Sep 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.118835
Revised: January 27, 2026
Accepted: February 28, 2026
Published online: September 7, 2026
Processing time: 211 Days and 3.8 Hours
Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib have shown limited efficacy in solid tumors, largely due to intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of drug resistance. In the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology, Li et al demonstrated that a wogonin derivative markedly enhances the antitumor activity of bortezomib in gastric carcinoma by disrupting lysosome-mediated drug sequestration. This work provides important mechanistic insights into how lysosomal function contributes to therapeutic resistance and highlights lysosomal vulnerability as a potential target for combination strategies. Lysosomes are dynamic regulators of cellular stress responses and drug tolerance, not merely degradative organelles. Activation of transcription factor EB-dependent lysosomal biogenesis represents a key adaptive mechanism enabling cancer cells to buffer proteotoxic stress. The findings reported by Li et al support this conceptual framework by demonstrating that interference with lysosomal integrity can restore proteasome accessibility and enhance cytotoxic efficacy. Notably, validation in patient-derived organoids strengthens the translational relevance of targeting lysosomal pathways. This approach may help identify responsive subsets and optimize regimens. Future studies are warranted to further elucidate lysosome-dependent resistance me
Core Tip: Proteasome inhibitor resistance in solid tumors remains a major therapeutic challenge. This letter highlights lysosomal vulnerability as a central adaptive mechanism underlying bortezomib resistance in gastric cancer. By reframing lysosomes as active regulators of proteotoxic stress and drug sequestration rather than passive degradative organelles, the discussed study supports lysosome-targeted strategies as a promising therapeutic axis. Patient-derived organoid validation further underscores the translational relevance of intercepting lysosome-centered stress adaptation to enhance proteasome inhibitor efficacy.
- Citation: Liu WW, Yang XJ. Letter to the Editor: Lysosomal vulnerability as a therapeutic axis for overcoming proteasome inhibitor resistance in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(33): 118835
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i33/118835.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.118835
We read with great interest the recent article by Li et al[1], published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastro
Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib have achieved remarkable success in hematological malignancies; however, their clinical efficacy in solid tumors remains limited[4]. Increasing evidence suggests this discrepancy arises not merely from inadequate target engagement, but rather from cancer cells' ability to adapt to proteotoxic stress via coordinated organelle-based defense mechanisms[5]. In this context, lysosomes act not as passive degradative compartments, but as dynamic regulators of cellular stress responses, metabolic adaptation, and drug tolerance[2,6]. Activation of transcription factor EB-dependent lysosomal biogenesis represents a central adaptive mechanism by which tumor cells enhance lysosomal capacity. This process buffers proteotoxic stress caused by proteasome inhibition and sequesters cytotoxic agents away from their intended targets[7]. This lysosome-centered adaptive response may represent a common stress-buffering strategy among various solid tumor types, potentially explaining the generally limited efficacy of proteasome inhibitors beyond hematological cancers. However, tumor cell reliance on lysosome-mediated stress buffering likely varies according to tumor type, genetic background, and microenvironmental context, emphasizing the need for tumor-specific validation of lysosome-targeted therapies.
The work by Li et al[1] provides compelling experimental evidence supporting this conceptual framework. Their findings demonstrate that bortezomib exposure promotes lysosomal expansion and drug sequestration, thus reducing proteasome accessibility and therapeutic efficacy[8,9]. Importantly, disruption of lysosomal integrity by wogonin derivative effectively reverses this adaptive response, restoring proteasome engagement and enhancing cytotoxic stress. By positioning lysosomal function upstream of proteasome inhibitor resistance, this study reframes lysosomes as critical regulatory hubs rather than downstream effects of drug-induced stress[10]. From an editorial perspective, this reframing is particularly significant, shifting therapeutic attention from solely enhancing proteasome inhibition toward targeting upstream organelle-based resistance mechanisms.
Such a perspective extends beyond the specific compounds investigated and suggests that lysosomal vulnerability may constitute a broadly applicable therapeutic axis in the treatment of solid tumors[3,11].
A notable strength of the study is the validation of these mechanistic insights in patient-derived organoid models. Organoids preserve essential features of tumor architecture, genetic heterogeneity, and stress-response capacity, thereby providing a translationally relevant platform for therapeutic evaluation[12]. The finding that lysosome-disrupting strategies enhance the efficacy of bortezomib in patient-derived gastric cancer organoids effectively bridges experimental observations with potential clinical application. In this context, organoid-based systems may be particularly valuable for capturing lysosome-dependent stress adaptations that are often diminished or absent in conventional two-dimensional cell culture models[13].
This approach may enable the identification of patient subsets most likely to benefit from lysosome-targeted combination therapies[14] and supports the integration of organoid-based platforms into precision oncology workflows[15].
These findings also raise several important questions for future investigation. Further studies are needed to define the molecular determinants governing lysosome-dependent drug sequestration across diverse tumor contexts and to establish the therapeutic window and selectivity of lysosome-disrupting strategies. Given the essential role of lysosomes in normal cellular homeostasis, careful assessment of on-target and off-target effects will be critical to minimize potential toxicity in non-malignant tissues[16]. It will also be important to determine whether targeting lysosomal vulnerability can be safely combined with other treatment modalities, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies, and whether biomarkers of lysosomal activity or transcription factor EB signaling can guide patient stratification[17]. Addressing these issues is essential for translating lysosomal vulnerability from a compelling mechanistic concept into a clinically actionable therapeutic strategy.
In summary, the study by Li et al[1] highlights lysosomal vulnerability as an emerging, mechanistically grounded therapeutic axis for overcoming proteasome inhibitor resistance in gastric cancer. By redefining lysosomes as active mediators of drug tolerance and stress adaptation, this work opens new avenues for combination strategies aimed at enhancing the efficacy of proteasome inhibition in solid tumors.
| 1. | Li SC, Shao SZ, Zhang YH, Zhou Y, Shang WT, Gao Y, He QB, Guo QL, Guo CY, Zhang XB. Wogonin derivative V8 enhances bortezomib efficacy in gastric carcinoma by disrupting lysosome-mediated drug resistance. World J Gastroenterol. 2026;32:113299. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Hraběta J, Belhajová M, Šubrtová H, Merlos Rodrigo MA, Heger Z, Eckschlager T. Drug Sequestration in Lysosomes as One of the Mechanisms of Chemoresistance of Cancer Cells and the Possibilities of Its Inhibition. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4392. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in RCA: 78] [Article Influence: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Geisslinger F, Müller M, Vollmar AM, Bartel K. Targeting Lysosomes in Cancer as Promising Strategy to Overcome Chemoresistance-A Mini Review. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1156. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in RCA: 68] [Article Influence: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 4. | Moreau P, Richardson PG, Cavo M, Orlowski RZ, San Miguel JF, Palumbo A, Harousseau JL. Proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood. 2012;120:947-959. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 357] [Cited by in RCA: 399] [Article Influence: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 5. | Manasanch EE, Orlowski RZ. Proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:417-433. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 850] [Cited by in RCA: 760] [Article Influence: 84.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Perera RM, Zoncu R. The Lysosome as a Regulatory Hub. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2016;32:223-253. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 350] [Cited by in RCA: 510] [Article Influence: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Settembre C, Di Malta C, Polito VA, Garcia Arencibia M, Vetrini F, Erdin S, Erdin SU, Huynh T, Medina D, Colella P, Sardiello M, Rubinsztein DC, Ballabio A. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science. 2011;332:1429-1433. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 2948] [Cited by in RCA: 2784] [Article Influence: 185.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 8. | Zhitomirsky B, Assaraf YG. Lysosomes as mediators of drug resistance in cancer. Drug Resist Updat. 2016;24:23-33. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 418] [Cited by in RCA: 384] [Article Influence: 38.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Zhitomirsky B, Assaraf YG. Lysosomal accumulation of anticancer drugs triggers lysosomal exocytosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:45117-45132. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 104] [Cited by in RCA: 141] [Article Influence: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Dharmasivam M, Kaya B. Lysosome as a Chemical Reactor. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:11581. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Trybus W, Trybus E, Król T. Lysosomes as a Target of Anticancer Therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:2176. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 45] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 12. | Weeber F, Ooft SN, Dijkstra KK, Voest EE. Tumor Organoids as a Pre-clinical Cancer Model for Drug Discovery. Cell Chem Biol. 2017;24:1092-1100. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 278] [Cited by in RCA: 398] [Article Influence: 44.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
| 13. | Drost J, Clevers H. Organoids in cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:407-418. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1534] [Cited by in RCA: 1284] [Article Influence: 160.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (4)] |
| 14. | Vlachogiannis G, Hedayat S, Vatsiou A, Jamin Y, Fernández-Mateos J, Khan K, Lampis A, Eason K, Huntingford I, Burke R, Rata M, Koh DM, Tunariu N, Collins D, Hulkki-Wilson S, Ragulan C, Spiteri I, Moorcraft SY, Chau I, Rao S, Watkins D, Fotiadis N, Bali M, Darvish-Damavandi M, Lote H, Eltahir Z, Smyth EC, Begum R, Clarke PA, Hahne JC, Dowsett M, de Bono J, Workman P, Sadanandam A, Fassan M, Sansom OJ, Eccles S, Starling N, Braconi C, Sottoriva A, Robinson SP, Cunningham D, Valeri N. Patient-derived organoids model treatment response of metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Science. 2018;359:920-926. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 1739] [Cited by in RCA: 1573] [Article Influence: 196.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (8)] |
| 15. | van de Wetering M, Francies HE, Francis JM, Bounova G, Iorio F, Pronk A, van Houdt W, van Gorp J, Taylor-Weiner A, Kester L, McLaren-Douglas A, Blokker J, Jaksani S, Bartfeld S, Volckman R, van Sluis P, Li VS, Seepo S, Sekhar Pedamallu C, Cibulskis K, Carter SL, McKenna A, Lawrence MS, Lichtenstein L, Stewart C, Koster J, Versteeg R, van Oudenaarden A, Saez-Rodriguez J, Vries RG, Getz G, Wessels L, Stratton MR, McDermott U, Meyerson M, Garnett MJ, Clevers H. Prospective derivation of a living organoid biobank of colorectal cancer patients. Cell. 2015;161:933-945. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 2105] [Cited by in RCA: 1898] [Article Influence: 172.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (5)] |
| 16. | Rebecca VW, Amaravadi RK. Emerging strategies to effectively target autophagy in cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35:1-11. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 170] [Cited by in RCA: 209] [Article Influence: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 17. | Napolitano G, Ballabio A. TFEB at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:2475-2481. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 331] [Cited by in RCA: 625] [Article Influence: 62.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |