BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2025; 31(36): 107703
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i36.107703
Critical flicker frequency improves after alcohol detoxification and is associated with liver stiffness
Omar Elshaarawy, Shuai Lan, Johannes Mueller, Sebastian Mueller, Center for Alcohol Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Omar Elshaarawy, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32511, Egypt
Omar Elshaarawy, Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool University, Liverpool L78XP, United Kingdom
ORCID number: Omar Elshaarawy (0000-0002-6945-6204); Shuai Lan (0009-0004-1869-3762); Johannes Mueller (0000-0002-5205-4129); Sebastian Mueller (0000-0002-3577-8491).
Co-first authors: Omar Elshaarawy and Shuai Lan.
Author contributions: Elshaarawy O and Mueller J contributed to conceptualization; Lan S conducted the experiments; Mueller J performed the data analysis; Mueller S acquired funding and designed the study; Elshaarawy O and Lan S contributed equally as co-first authors. All authors contributed to writing-draft, writing-revision, and approved to submit the final version.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Heidelberg, No. S150-2015.
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardians, provided written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: There is no additional data available.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Sebastian Mueller, PhD, Professor, Center for Alcohol Research, University of Heidelberg, In Neuenheimer Feld 350, Heidelberg 69120, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. sebastian.mueller@urz.uni-heidelberg.de
Received: April 7, 2025
Revised: May 18, 2025
Accepted: August 22, 2025
Published online: September 28, 2025
Processing time: 165 Days and 16.8 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Critical flicker frequency (CFF) is a quantitative tool for assessing hepatic encephalopathy (HE), particularly minimal HE, which is associated with poor prognosis in liver cirrhosis. Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is a leading global cause of cirrhosis; however, the effects of alcohol on CFF and its relationship with liver stiffness (LS) remain underexplored.

AIM

To study the impact of alcohol withdrawal on CFF and its correlation with LS in ALD patients.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients were included: 93 heavy drinkers hospitalized for detoxification, 15 with non-ALD etiologies, and 20 healthy controls. CFF was measured using the Hepatonorm analyzer, and LS via transient elastography (FibroScan). Baseline and post-detoxification assessments were conducted in 57 ALD patients.

RESULTS

The cohort had a mean age of 53.7 ± 13.8 years, with 74% male participants. CFF measurements were reliable, with 97.2% of patients showing an interquartile range < 20%. ALD patients exhibited significantly lower CFF compared to controls. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for overt HE (n = 12) yielded an area under the curve of 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.84, P = 0.0142), with an optimal cutoff of 36.5 Hz. CFF significantly improved post-detoxification. Patients with LS > 17 kPa had lower CFF, while those with intermediate LS showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

CFF is influenced by HE severity and acute alcohol exposure, showing improvement after detoxification. Its weak correlation with fibrosis stage suggests that CFF serves as a sensitive neurocognitive marker in ALD.

Key Words: Critical flicker frequency; Hepatic encephalopathy; Alcohol-related liver disease; Fibrosis; Cirrhosis; Transient elastography; Liver stiffness

Core Tip: This study demonstrates that critical flicker frequency (CFF), a non-invasive marker of neurocognitive function, significantly improves following alcohol detoxification in patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). CFF was reduced in ALD patients and correlated with liver stiffness, particularly post-detoxification, highlighting its utility in detecting minimal hepatic encephalopathy. These findings underscore CFF’s value in assessing alcohol-related neurotoxicity and monitoring therapeutic response, supporting its integration into routine evaluation of patients with ALD and cirrhosis.



INTRODUCTION

Alcohol remains a major global health concern, contributing to approximately three million deaths annually and playing a key role in the development of chronic liver disease[1-4]. As a systemic toxin, alcohol exerts deleterious effects on multiple organ systems, with over 200 distinct pathological conditions linked to its consumption[1]. Among the most severely affected organs are the liver and brain, where hepatic encephalopathy (HE) represents a critical complication in advanced liver disease[2]. HE commonly manifests in the setting of decompensated cirrhosis[5,6], further worsening an already poor prognosis[7]. Its onset often signals life-threatening complications, such as infections or gastrointestinal hemorrhage, necessitating prompt recognition and intervention[8,9].

The diagnosis of HE traditionally relies on clinical assessment, including the detection of asterixis and psychomotor impairment. While quantitative diagnostic tools have refined severity assessment[10-12], simpler bedside tests such as the number connection test remain widely used despite their limitations due to confounding factors[7,13]. Minimal HE (MHE), a subclinical form of HE characterized by subtle neurocognitive dysfunction, has gained increasing recognition due to its prognostic significance. Accurate detection of MHE is crucial, as it can predict the progression to overt HE and impact patient outcomes[13]. Critical flicker frequency (CFF) testing has emerged as a robust, non-invasive psychophysical tool for assessing MHE, offering valuable insights into neurocognitive integrity by evaluating visual cortical function[13-17]. Its diagnostic accuracy and predictive value in identifying complications, including post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt outcomes, underscore its clinical relevance[18-22].

Despite growing evidence on CFF as a marker of neurocognitive dysfunction in cirrhosis, the direct impact of alcohol on CFF remains poorly understood[16,23,24]. Given alcohol’s neurotoxic effects and its interplay with hepatic fibrosis severity[25,26], this study investigates dynamic changes in CFF among heavy drinkers before and after detoxification. By integrating liver stiffness (LS) measurements and laboratory parameters, we here aim to investigate the impact of alcohol withdrawal on CFF and its correlation with LS in alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design and ethical approval

This study was conducted at the Salem Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany, to assess the utility of CFF and LS measurements in heavy alcohol users and patients with ALD. The study design is shown in Figure 1. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg, and all participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart illustrating the study design and patient selection process. ALD: Alcohol-related liver disease; LS: Liver stiffness; US: Ultrasound; CFF: Critical flicker frequency.
Participant recruitment

A total of 117 Caucasian patients aged 18-75 years were enrolled, meeting the inclusion criteria of chronic excessive alcohol consumption (≥ 1 year, exceeding three units/day for men and two units/day for women). Baseline assessments for patients admitted for detoxification were conducted within 24 hours of admission, prior to the initiation of specific detoxification pharmacotherapy, to capture the acute effects of alcohol and early withdrawal. The timing relative to the last alcohol intake varied but was typically within the preceding 12-48 hours for this group. Withdrawal severity was not systematically quantified using standardized scales (e.g., Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol) as part of this specific research protocol, which should be considered a limitation; however, all patients received standard institutional detoxification protocols managed by the clinical team. Exclusion criteria included the presence of other chronic liver diseases, malignancies and conditions interfering with CFF or LS measurements. Additionally, 20 healthy volunteers served as controls. A subset of ALD patients underwent repeat assessments after a mean detoxification period of 5.3 days.

CFF measurement

CFF was measured using the Hepatonorm analyzer (R&R Medi-Business, Germany) following established protocols[14]. Testing was conducted in a semi-darkened environment, and CFF was recorded as the median frequency at which flickering light was perceived. Patients were instructed to fixate on the light-emitting diode and indicate verbally the point at which the flickering light appeared continuous (ascending frequency) and the point at which continuous light started to flicker (descending frequency). The mean of these two readings was taken for each measurement, and the median of five such valid measurements constituted the final CFF value. Patient cooperation and understanding were assessed prior to and during the test. A CFF threshold of < 39 Hz was used to define MHE, in accordance with American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines[20,27] and served as the primary method for MHE diagnosis in this study, as specific additional neuropsychological tests were not systematically performed across all participants for this research purpose. Overt HE was clinically diagnosed by the attending physicians based on the West Haven criteria, considering clinical signs such as asterixis, altered consciousness, and psychomotor abnormalities.

LS assessment

LS was measured via transient elastography (FibroScan, Echosens, France), adhering to standardized protocols[4,28]. Reliable LS measurements were defined as an interquartile range (IQR)/median ratio < 30%. Additionally, ultrasound imaging was performed to exclude confounding conditions such as biliary obstruction or vascular congestion.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 25. Continuous variables are presented as means ± SD, while categorical variables are expressed as frequencies. Group comparisons were conducted using the independent Student’s t-test, and follow-up data were analyzed with the paired t-test. Correlations were assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The diagnostic performance of CFF was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS
Patient characteristics and CFF performance

Of the 117 patients initially enrolled, 9 were excluded due to invalid CFF assessments, primarily due to difficulties in understanding or performing the test. This included three patients who consistently reported flickering, one who perceived multiple visual targets, and five who were unable to follow instructions. The final analysis included 108 patients, yielding a mean CFF of 40.5 ± 6.1 Hz and an IQR of 2.6 ± 2.0 Hz. Measurement reliability was high, with 97.2% of patients exhibiting an IQR < 20% and 83.3% with an IQR < 10%. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among the 93 patients diagnosed with ALD, cirrhosis was confirmed in 30% of cases based on established clinical criteria. In comparison, cirrhosis was observed in 33% of patients with non-ALD etiologies. HE was diagnosed in 9.7% of ALD patients and 20% of non-ALD patients. Using a diagnostic threshold of < 39 Hz for CFF, 42% of ALD patients and 73% of non-ALD patients were classified as having MHE.

Table 1 Patient characteristics of the total cohort (n = 108).
Total (n = 108)
ALD (n = 93)
Non-ALD (n = 15)
P value
mean
SD
mean
SD
mean
SD
CFF (Hz)40.56.141.06.137.35.50.0282
Sex (male, %)74.172.086.70.2343
Age (years)53.713.851.512.867.012.70.0000
Alcohol consumption (g/day)120.7121.7140.4121.811.523.10.0001
Pack years2126232610200.1400
HE (1 or 0, %)11.19.720.00.2418
BMI (kg/m2)25.84.725.75.126.32.50.7440
Laboratory
AST (U/L)1021381001351161640.7010
ALT (U/L)698464611021690.1115
GGT (U/L)2864323164581011100.0850
AP (U/L)1065510756103510.8486
Bilirubin total (μmol/L)34.281.634.286.034.445.80.9934
Quick (%)96.827.698.826.582.031.60.0470
INR1.060.321.030.241.320.620.0025
Urea (mmol/L)5.123.744.693.257.895.410.0024
Creatinine (μmol/L)77.846.072.541.5109.657.50.0036
Sodium (mmol/L)134.617.6134.418.9135.65.00.8189
Potassium (mmol/L)4.11.94.22.03.90.60.6369
Lipase (U/L)52.744.352.545.954.131.60.9117
PTT (seconds)36.67.236.77.035.59.90.7658
Hemoglobin (g/L)145.782.9148.188.1130.231.30.4555
Hematocrit (%)39.28.339.48.237.98.70.5219
Erythrocytes (/pL)4.140.794.150.754.111.040.8534
Leukocytes (/nL)8.384.148.524.047.394.860.3592
Platelets (/nL)2021172151141231140.1355
Ferritin (μg/L)5627125587055867940.9082
CRP (mg/L)1302511322621211760.8930
Albumin (g/L)42.19.442.59.636.82.90.4121
Protein total (g/L)71.97.072.66.564.38.70.0201
Glucose (mmol/L)6.002.656.152.885.541.930.6388
Triglycerides (mmol/L)1.832.401.862.461.210.690.7132
Cholesterol (mmol/L)6.152.376.242.394.290.770.2617
Ultrasound
Spleen size (cm)10.51.510.61.39.82.40.1235
Steatosis hepatis (0-3)0.670.680.710.680.170.410.0582
Ascites (1 or 0, %)23.522.137.50.3335
Signs of cirrhosis (1 or 0, %)28.228.625.00.8333
Liver stiffness (kPa)14.7817.3414.4517.5020.9715.040.5304

Figure 2A illustrates the distribution of CFF values across healthy controls (n = 20), ALD patients (n = 93), and non-ALD patients (n = 15). A significant reduction in CFF was noted in both patient groups compared to controls (P < 0.05 for ALD; P < 0.001 for non-ALD). Notably, a subset of ALD patients exhibited CFF values exceeding those of healthy volunteers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the entire cohort (n = 108) with overt HE (n = 12) demonstrated moderate diagnostic utility for CFF, with an area under the curve of 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.84, P = 0.0142; see Figure 2B). The optimal CFF cutoff for detecting overt HE was identified as 36.5 Hz.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Critical flicker frequency in patients with and without alcohol-related liver disease and diagnostic accuracy to detect hepatic encephalopathy. A: Critical flicker frequency (CFF) in patients with alcohol-related liver disease, non-alcohol-related liver disease etiologies, and healthy volunteers (controls). The mean CFF is significantly lower in disease groups compared to controls. However, a wider spread of CFF values is observed among patients, with some individuals showing higher CFF values than controls; B: Receiver operating characteristic curve for the detection of overt hepatic encephalopathy (n = 12). The area under the curve was 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.84, P = 0.0142), with an optimal cutoff for hepatic encephalopathy at 36.5 Hz. P values were determined using Tukey’s test. ALD: Alcohol-related liver disease; CFF: Critical flicker frequency. aP < 0.05, cP < 0.001.
Correlations between CFF, laboratory parameters, and imaging

Spearman correlation coefficients revealed significant associations between CFF and various clinical parameters (Table 2). A negative correlation was observed with age (r = -0.20, P = 0.036) and LS (r = -0.26, P = 0.042), while positive correlations were found with pack-years of alcohol consumption (r = 0.249, P = 0.03), serum potassium levels (r = 0.259, P = 0.01), and platelet counts (r = 0.32, P = 0.001). Although trends were noted for HE grade, bilirubin, and creatinine, these did not reach statistical significance.

Table 2 Spearman correlation coefficient with all patients (alcohol-related liver disease and non-alcohol-related liver disease, n = 108).
Spearman correlation coefficient
CFF, r
P value
Sex (female = 0, male = 1)0.0840.387
Age (years)-0.2020.036
Alcohol consumption (g/day)0.1220.233
Pack years0.2490.031
HE (1 or 0)-0.1790.064
BMI (kg/m2)-0.1690.266
AST (U/L)-0.0950.339
ALT (U/L)0.0170.866
GGT (U/L)-0.1150.258
AP (U/L)-0.0110.915
Bilirubin total (μmol/L)-0.1730.083
Quick (%)0.1260.208
INR-0.1070.289
Urea (mmol/L)-0.0650.514
Creatinine (μmol/L)-0.1760.070
Sodium (mmol/L)-0.0260.799
Potassium (mmol/L)0.2590.010
Lipase (U/L)0.0630.550
PTT (seconds)0.1410.434
Hemoglobin (g/L)0.1490.129
Hematocrit (%)0.1030.294
Erythrocytes (/pL)0.1760.073
Leukocytes (/nL)0.1430.149
Platelets (/nL)0.3180.001
Ferritin (μg/μL)-0.1330.254
CRP (mg/L)-0.0250.807
Spleen size (cm)0.0000.997
Ascites (1 or 0)-0.1760.108
Steatosis hepatis (0-3)0.0720.537
Cirrhosis (1 or 0)-0.1700.116
Liver stiffness (kPa)-0.2630.042
CFF and cirrhosis in patients undergoing alcohol detoxification

To examine the effect of alcohol detoxification on CFF, data from 57 ALD patients who underwent structured detoxification were analyzed. From the initial cohort of 93 ALD patients, 23 were excluded as CFF measurements were not performed within 24 hours of admission, and 13 were excluded due to incomplete evaluations for cirrhosis. Among the remaining 57, 44 patients underwent a second CFF measurement approximately after one week of detoxification, with an average interval of 5.4 ± 1.5 days. Table 3 summarizes the clinical characteristics of this subset, which consisted of 71% male patients with a mean age of 50.6 ± 12.9 years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.7 ± 5.1 kg/m², and a mean daily alcohol consumption of 137 ± 120 g/day over an average period of 16.7 ± 9.7 years. Cirrhosis was confirmed in 17.5% of patients (n = 10).

Table 3 Patient characteristics of the detoxification cohort (n = 57) for patients with critical flicker frequency measurements before and after detoxification (n = 44).
Parameter
Before detox (n = 57)1
Before (n = 44)2
After (n = 44)2
P value
mean
SD
mean
SD
mean
SD
CFF (Hz)41.85.940.75.443.74.70.0001
CFF below 39 Hz (%)344014
Sex (male, %)70.770.5
Age (years)50.612.950.411.8
Alcohol consumption (g/day)136.7120.3132.2100.8
Duration of drinking (years)16.79.716.89.4
Packyears20.220.822.119.4
HE (1 or 0, %)5.22.3
BMI (kg/m2)26.75.126.35.8
AST (U/L)96139908873770.0591
ALT (U/L)7170664967520.0379
GGT (U/L)3354973715543104190.0386
AP (U/L)105541075480420.0001
Bilirubin total (μmol/L)30.497.515.422.110.18.60.2091
Quick (%)104.619.2106.617.0106.218.20.3481
INR0.980.180.960.140.960.160.5897
Urea (mmol/L)4.182.553.501.564.031.420.4524
Creatinine (μmol/L)66.328.360.117.775.115.90.0010
Sodium (mmol/L)13615138413940.0466
Potassium (mmol/L)4.00.53.90.44.00.30.4057
Lipase (U/L)47.326.749.728.0142.3229.50.2654
PTT (seconds)35.85.035.34.436.15.10.2407
Hemoglobin (g/L)1474414113134180.0039
Hematocrit (%)41.38.140.33.938.55.20.0399
Erythrocytes (/pL)4.30.64.30.54.00.60.0044
Leukocytes (/nL)8.02.77.72.77.62.20.2333
Platelets (/nL)2248722278210690.3502
Ferritin (μg/L)4705505366054104630.0527
CRP (mg/L)75168701711261950.9390
Alcohol (g/L)1.051.191.161.240.000.010.0003
Spleen size (cm)10.30.910.30.8
Ascites (1 or 0, %)9.17.3
Steatosis hepatis (0-3)0.830.710.850.66
Signs of cirrhosis (1 or 0, %)18.515.0
Liver stiffness (kPa)12.115.810.714.56.54.40.1015

CFF values for controls, non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients are shown in Figure 3A. Baseline CFF values for non-cirrhotic ALD patients averaged 41.8 ± 5.9 Hz, which was comparable to healthy controls (45.0 ± 2.1 Hz; P = NS). In contrast, cirrhotic ALD patients exhibited significantly lower baseline CFF values (39.9 ± 6.9 Hz; P < 0.05 vs controls). Post-detoxification (Figure 3B), CFF increased significantly in non-cirrhotic patients (from 41.1 ± 5.5 Hz to 43.9 ± 4.7 Hz; P < 0.001), whereas cirrhotic patients showed a less pronounced increase (from 38.7 ± 3.7 Hz to 42.6 ± 4.7 Hz; P = NS).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Effect of cirrhosis status on critical flicker frequency and alcohol detoxification stratified by cirrhosis status. A: Critical flicker frequency (CFF) in patients with cirrhosis (n = 10) and without cirrhosis (n = 47) compared to controls (n = 20). Cirrhotic patients exhibit significantly lower CFF values than controls. P values were determined using Tukey’s test; B: Changes in CFF following alcohol detoxification in patients with pre- and post-detoxification measurements (n = 44). CFF was analyzed in subgroups of patients with cirrhosis (n = 6) and without cirrhosis (n = 38). CFF significantly increases in the no-cirrhosis group after alcohol detoxification. P values were determined using paired samples t-test. CFF: Critical flicker frequency. aP < 0.05, cP < 0.001.

Among the 44 patients assessed pre- and post-detoxification, 40.1% (n = 18) initially recorded CFF values below the MHE diagnostic threshold of 39 Hz. Following detoxification, only 13.6% (n = 6) remained below this threshold, reflecting a substantial improvement in neurocognitive function. Spearman correlations in this subset, shown in Table 4, revealed significant associations between pre-detoxification CFF and BMI (r = -0.55, P = 0.015) and platelet count (r = 0.48, P = 0.001). After detoxification, CFF correlated significantly with serum sodium (r = -0.53, P = 0.027) and LS (r = 0.64, P = 0.03), suggesting that alcohol abstinence may better elucidate the link between hepatic dysfunction and neurocognitive impairment.

Table 4 Spearman correlations for critical flicker frequency before and after alcohol detoxification (n = 44).
ParameterCFF1 (Hz)
CFF2 (Hz)
r
P value
n
r
P value
n
CFF1 (Hz)1.00< 0.001440.59< 0.00144
CFF2 (Hz)0.59< 0.001441.00< 0.00144
Sex (female = 0, male = 1)0.080.586440.150.34744
Age (years)-0.130.38544-0.100.51844
Alcohol consumption (g/day)0.180.263400.060.71740
Pack years-0.100.591300.100.60630
BMI (kg/m2)-0.550.01519-0.290.22319
AST (U/L)-0.100.53044-0.020.93625
ALT (U/L)0.030.82944-0.040.84524
GGT (U/L)-0.220.16939-0.030.88624
AP (U/L)0.010.947440.020.94325
Bilirubin total (μmol/L)-0.130.419420.180.41523
Quick (%)0.230.136440.230.31920
INR-0.250.10543-0.260.27420
Urea (mmol/L)-0.100.54443-0.270.23321
Creatinine (μmol/L)-0.120.42644-0.310.17621
Sodium (mmol/L)0.010.97141-0.530.02717
Potassium (mmol/L)0.190.24341-0.260.31517
Lipase (U/L)-0.130.435390.070.8678
PTT (seconds)0.120.681140.090.72717
Hemoglobin (g/L)0.150.344440.190.36425
Hematocrit (%)0.120.432440.140.49525
Erythrocytes (/pL)0.250.096440.090.67125
Leukocytes (/nL)0.130.41544-0.310.13025
Platelets (/nL)0.480.00144-0.290.16325
Ferritin (μg/L)-0.220.204350.170.57113
CRP (mg/L)-0.120.466420.180.45120
Alcohol (g/L)-0.020.90238-0.020.93720
Spleen size (cm)0.020.883390.200.22139
Ascites (1 or 0)-0.150.36141-0.250.12241
Steatosis hepatis (0-3)0.040.823400.090.59540
Cirrhosis (1 or 0)-0.110.46944-0.130.39944
Liver stiffness (kPa)-0.040.819350.640.03311
Comparison of CFF in cirrhosis stratified by LS and imaging

Baseline CFF values were compared among patients stratified by LS and ultrasound findings. Among 108 patients with valid CFF data, 85 underwent ultrasound evaluation, and 60 had LS measurements. Patients were grouped into LS categories of < 6 kPa, 6-17 kPa, and > 17 kPa, with the latter threshold indicative of cirrhosis. The results are shown in Figure 4. CFF values were significantly lower in patients with LS > 17 kPa compared to those with LS < 6 kPa (P < 0.05; Figure 4A). However, no significant difference was observed between the 6-17 kPa and < 6 kPa groups. Similarly, patients with ultrasonographic evidence of cirrhosis exhibited lower CFF values, although this trend did not reach statistical significance (Figure 4B).

Figure 4
Figure 4 Comparison of critical flicker frequency. A: Liver stiffness intervals; B: Ultrasonographic signs of cirrhosis. Patients with liver stiffness > 17 kPa exhibited significantly lower critical flicker frequency values than those with LS < 6 kPa (P < 0.05). The difference between patients with and without sonographic signs of cirrhosis did not reach statistical significance. P values were determined using an unpaired independent samples t-test. CFF: Critical flicker frequency. aP < 0.05.
DISCUSSION

This study highlights three key findings: (1) CFF improves significantly following alcohol withdrawal, indicating that alcohol exerts direct neurotoxic effects; (2) CFF is an effective tool for detecting subclinical encephalopathy in ALD, capturing a spectrum of neurocognitive deficits that may not be apparent on clinical examination; and (3) Although the correlation between CFF and LS was modest, particularly in patients with advanced fibrosis, the association suggests that CFF may partially reflect hepatic structural changes alongside functional deficits.

Our data demonstrate that alcohol abstinence leads to a marked improvement in CFF, particularly in patients without cirrhosis. This improvement likely reflects the reversal of acute, direct neurotoxic effects of alcohol on the central nervous system, such as temporary cortical suppression and altered neurotransmitter function, which can impair visual temporal processing. The observation that CFF can normalize in a substantial portion of patients soon after detoxification supports this notion of a reversible component. This supports the hypothesis that CFF reflects cortical processing of visual stimuli[29] and is influenced by both acute and chronic alcohol consumption[25,26]. It is important to distinguish these acute, reversible effects from the more chronic, potentially structural neuro-adaptive changes or damage (e.g., neuronal loss, gliosis, white matter alterations) that can occur with long-term heavy alcohol use, especially in the context of cirrhosis. These chronic changes may contribute to the persistent CFF deficits observed in some patients, particularly those with more advanced liver disease, even after a period of abstinence. The normalization of CFF in approximately half of the patients initially classified as having MHE highlights its sensitivity as a marker for subtle cognitive impairment[30]. This reversibility positions CFF as a promising biomarker not only for detection but also for monitoring therapeutic response during early abstinence. Early detection is clinically relevant, as even mild cognitive dysfunction increases the risk of accidents, particularly those involving motor vehicles[31,32].

Patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis exhibited less robust recovery in CFF following detoxification, suggesting that structural and functional changes in the brain may contribute to persistent neurocognitive deficits. The interplay of elevated neurotoxins, such as ammonia, and irreversible structural alterations likely perpetuates encephalopathy despite alcohol cessation[14,19,33]. These findings underscore the need for tailored management strategies in cirrhotic patients to address persistent cognitive impairment[34,35], potentially including neuroprotective agents or cognitive rehabilitation, although further research is needed in these areas. For instance, studies utilizing magnetic resonance spectroscopy have shown altered brain metabolite profiles (e.g., decreased myo-inositol, increased glutamine/glutamate) in cirrhotic patients, indicative of osmotic stress and impaired glial function, which can persist even with abstinence and contribute to cognitive deficits[36]. Furthermore, advanced neuroimaging techniques like diffusion tensor imaging have revealed white matter microstructural abnormalities in patients with ALD and cirrhosis, suggesting axonal damage and demyelination that may not fully recover and could underpin lasting CFF impairments[36].

Our results corroborate previous studies demonstrating the association between CFF and LS, particularly after detoxification. LS, as assessed via transient elastography, is a well-established indicator of fibrosis severity and long-term prognosis in chronic liver disease[4,37,38]. As alcohol cessation reduces the confounding effects of hepatocyte swelling and necrosis on LS measurements, CFF emerges as a complementary marker for identifying patients at high risk for progressive encephalopathy and adverse outcomes[39].

While CFF demonstrates significant potential as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, its clinical application is not without challenges. Successful CFF measurement depends on patient cooperation, visual acuity, and a controlled testing environment. Patients with advanced HE, particularly those classified as West Haven grades III-IV, often struggle to complete the test reliably due to impaired cognitive function. This is supported by our findings, where some ALD patients exhibited higher measurements than controls, possibly due to delayed button pressing caused by slower response times. Additionally, external factors such as optical aids, ambient light conditions, and operator variability can introduce inconsistencies in measurement.

This study has several limitations. The sample size, particularly for subgroup analyses such as cirrhotic patients and non-ALD etiologies, was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of these specific findings. However, recruitment of participants, particularly those with ALD requiring detoxification is difficult due to the inherent challenges in engaging this patient population. The heterogeneity of the cohorts, including ALD, non-ALD, and healthy controls, while providing comparative insights, also introduces variability. Potential confounders such as specific comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, though major interfering conditions were exclusion criteria), concurrent medications, and detailed nutritional status beyond BMI were not exhaustively controlled for in this analysis. The follow-up period of approximately 5.3 days post-detoxification is short and primarily captures acute changes; longer-term follow-up would be needed to assess the persistence of CFF improvements and their correlation with sustained abstinence and liver function recovery.

Despite these limitations, the relative independence of CFF from variables such as age, sex, and educational background strengthens its applicability across diverse clinical populations. Furthermore, while detoxification protocols were standardized, variations in individual responses, medication use during detoxification (though aimed at managing withdrawal), and baseline nutritional status were not exhaustively controlled for and could represent confounding factors. However, further standardization of testing protocols and validation across different patient cohorts are necessary to enhance its utility in routine practice.

The findings of this study underscore the need for longitudinal investigations to establish CFF as a validated marker for disease progression and therapeutic response in ALD. Integration of CFF into multi-parametric diagnostic models, alongside LS and biochemical markers, could refine risk stratification algorithms for HE. Additionally, interventional studies evaluating the impact of specific therapies, such as ammonia-lowering agents and nutritional interventions, on CFF could provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying neurocognitive dysfunction in chronic liver disease.

This study highlights the utility of CFF as non-invasive tool for detecting and monitoring subclinical HE in patients with ALD despite of its moderate accuracy in this study. CFF provides valuable insights into disease severity and neurocognitive function, reflecting both the direct neurotoxic effects of alcohol and underlying hepatic dysfunction. Importantly, CFF responds dynamically to alcohol cessation, offering a sensitive measure of therapeutic impact.

CONCLUSION

In summary, incorporating CFF testing into standard clinical practice has the potential to enhance the early identification and management of patients at risk for HE. Future efforts should focus on optimizing testing protocols, validating its use in broader patient populations, and exploring its integration with other diagnostic modalities to improve outcomes in chronic liver disease.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: Germany

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B

P-Reviewer: Ghannam WM, MD, Professor, Egypt; Shomura M, PhD, Professor, Japan; Twohig P, MD, Assistant Professor, FRCPC, United States S-Editor: Wu S L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang L

References
1.  Masarone M, Rosato V, Dallio M, Abenavoli L, Federico A, Loguercio C, Persico M. Epidemiology and Natural History of Alcoholic Liver Disease. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2016;11:167-174.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in RCA: 45]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Orholm M, Sørensen TI, Bentsen K, Høybye G, Eghøje K, Christoffersen P. Mortality of alcohol abusing men prospectively assessed in relation to history of abuse and degree of liver injury. Liver. 1985;5:253-260.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  World Health Organization  Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. Sept 27, 2018. [cited 6 March 2025]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639/.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Mueller S, Heilig M.   Alcohol and Alcohol-related Diseases. Switzerland: Springer, 2023.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
5.  vom Dahl S, Kircheis G, Häussinger D. Hepatic encephalopathy as a complication of liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:152-156.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Rossi-Fanelli F, Cascino A, Strom R, Cardelli-Cangiano P, Ceci F, Muscaritoli M, Cangiano C. Amino acids and hepatic encephalopathy. Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28:277-301.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Krishnarao A, Gordon FD. Prognosis of Hepatic Encephalopathy. Clin Liver Dis. 2020;24:219-229.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Strauss E, Gomes de Sá Ribeiro Mde F. Bacterial infections associated with hepatic encephalopathy: prevalence and outcome. Ann Hepatol. 2003;2:41-45.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
9.  Frontera JA. Management of hepatic encephalopathy. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014;16:297.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Van der Rijt CC, Schalm SW, De Groot GH, De Vlieger M. Objective measurement of hepatic encephalopathy by means of automated EEG analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;57:423-426.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 117]  [Cited by in RCA: 111]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Ferenci P, Lockwood A, Mullen K, Tarter R, Weissenborn K, Blei AT. Hepatic encephalopathy--definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the working party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology. 2002;35:716-721.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1594]  [Cited by in RCA: 1412]  [Article Influence: 61.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Sugimoto R, Iwasa M, Maeda M, Urawa N, Tanaka H, Fujita N, Kobayashi Y, Takeda K, Kaito M, Takei Y. Value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for quantification of low-grade hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1413-1420.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in RCA: 39]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Chandra CS, Krishna PM, Girinadh L. Critical Flicker Frequency for Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients with Cirrhosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2011;1:16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
14.  Romero-Gómez M, Córdoba J, Jover R, del Olmo JA, Ramírez M, Rey R, de Madaria E, Montoliu C, Nuñez D, Flavia M, Compañy L, Rodrigo JM, Felipo V. Value of the critical flicker frequency in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2007;45:879-885.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 225]  [Cited by in RCA: 218]  [Article Influence: 12.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Ampuero J, Simón M, Montoliú C, Jover R, Serra MÁ, Córdoba J, Romero-Gómez M. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy and critical flicker frequency are associated with survival of patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1483-1489.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 92]  [Cited by in RCA: 104]  [Article Influence: 10.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Metwally MA, Biomy HA, Omar MZ, Sakr AI. Critical flickering frequency test: a diagnostic tool for minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;31:1030-1034.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Sendra C, Aguilera V, Ampuero J, Romero-Gomez M. EncephalApp and Critical Flicker Frequency are Associated With Accidental Falls in Liver Cirrhosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2017;7:S13-S14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
18.  Berlioux P, Robic MA, Poirson H, Métivier S, Otal P, Barret C, Lopez F, Péron JM, Vinel JP, Bureau C. Pre-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) prediction of post-TIPS overt hepatic encephalopathy: the critical flicker frequency is more accurate than psychometric tests. Hepatology. 2014;59:622-629.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in RCA: 66]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Biecker E, Hausdörfer I, Grünhage F, Strunk H, Sauerbruch T. Critical flicker frequency as a marker of hepatic encephalopathy in patients before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Digestion. 2011;83:24-31.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Kircheis G, Wettstein M, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, Häussinger D. Critical flicker frequency for quantification of low-grade hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2002;35:357-366.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 293]  [Cited by in RCA: 261]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Kircheis G, Bode JG, Hilger N, Kramer T, Schnitzler A, Häussinger D. Diagnostic and prognostic values of critical flicker frequency determination as new diagnostic tool for objective HE evaluation in patients undergoing TIPS implantation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:1383-1394.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Ehrenbauer AF, Schneider H, Stockhoff L, Tiede A, Lorenz C, Dirks M, Witt J, Gabriel MM, Wedemeyer H, Hinrichs JB, Weissenborn K, Maasoumy B. Predicting overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: Value of three minimal hepatic encephalopathy tests. JHEP Rep. 2023;5:100829.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Labenz C, Toenges G, Schattenberg JM, Nagel M, Huber Y, Marquardt JU, Labenz J, Galle PR, Wörns MA. Outcome Prediction of Covert Hepatic Encephalopathy in Liver Cirrhosis: Comparison of Four Testing Strategies. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020;11:e00172.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Ehrenbauer AF, Egge JFM, Gabriel MM, Tiede A, Dirks M, Witt J, Wedemeyer H, Maasoumy B, Weissenborn K. Comparison of 6 tests for diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predicting clinical outcome: A prospective, observational study. Hepatology. 2024;80:389-402.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Kunchulia M, Pilz KS, Herzog MH. How alcohol intake affects visual temporal processing. Vision Res. 2012;66:11-16.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Zhuang X, Kang P, King A, Cao D. Alcohol Intoxication Impairs Mesopic Rod and Cone Temporal Processing in Social Drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39:1842-1849.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; European Association for the Study of the Liver. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 practice guideline by the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. J Hepatol. 2014;61:642-659.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 369]  [Cited by in RCA: 333]  [Article Influence: 30.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Boursier J, Zarski JP, de Ledinghen V, Rousselet MC, Sturm N, Lebail B, Fouchard-Hubert I, Gallois Y, Oberti F, Bertrais S, Calès P; Multicentric Group from ANRS/HC/EP23 FIBROSTAR Studies. Determination of reliability criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2013;57:1182-1191.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 392]  [Cited by in RCA: 498]  [Article Influence: 41.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Nardella A, Rocchi L, Conte A, Bologna M, Suppa A, Berardelli A. Inferior parietal lobule encodes visual temporal resolution processes contributing to the critical flicker frequency threshold in humans. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98948.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Ampuero J, Montoliú C, Simón-Talero M, Aguilera V, Millán R, Márquez C, Jover R, Rico MC, Sendra C, Serra MÁ, Romero-Gómez M. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy identifies patients at risk of faster cirrhosis progression. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:718-725.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 39]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Thuluvath PJ, Nuthalapati A, Price J, Maheshwari A. Driving Performance Among Patients with Cirrhosis Who Drove to Their Outpatient Hepatology Clinic Appointments. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2016;6:3-9.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Liu YC, Ho CH. Effects of different blood alcohol concentrations and post-alcohol impairment on driving behavior and task performance. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11:334-341.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Barone M, Shahini E, Iannone A, Viggiani MT, Corvace V, Principi M, Di Leo A. Critical flicker frequency test predicts overt hepatic encephalopathy and survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50:496-500.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Leigh G. The combined effects of alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking on critical flicker frequency. Addict Behav. 1982;7:251-259.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Hill SY, Powell B, Goodwin DW. Critical flicker fusion: objective measure of alcohol tolerance? J Nerv Ment Dis. 1973;157:46-49.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Ahluwalia V, Wade JB, Moeller FG, White MB, Unser AB, Gavis EA, Sterling RK, Stravitz RT, Sanyal AJ, Siddiqui MS, Puri P, Luketic V, Heuman DM, Fuchs M, Matherly S, Bajaj JS. The etiology of cirrhosis is a strong determinant of brain reserve: A multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:1123-1132.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 47]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Castera L. Invasive and non-invasive methods for the assessment of fibrosis and disease progression in chronic liver disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:291-303.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in RCA: 106]  [Article Influence: 7.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Mueller S, Sandrin L. Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease. Hepat Med. 2010;2:49-67.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 230]  [Cited by in RCA: 276]  [Article Influence: 18.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Bardou-Jacquet E, Legros L, Soro D, Latournerie M, Guillygomarc'h A, Le Lan C, Brissot P, Guyader D, Moirand R. Effect of alcohol consumption on liver stiffness measured by transient elastography. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:516-522.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 51]  [Cited by in RCA: 58]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]