Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3305
Peer-review started: September 13, 2015
First decision: November 11, 2015
Revised: November 16, 2015
Accepted: December 8, 2015
Article in press: December 8, 2015
Published online: March 28, 2016
Processing time: 194 Days and 20.8 Hours
Hepatocarcinogenesis in human chronic liver diseases is a multi-step process in which hepatic precancerous lesions progress into early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and progressed HCC, and the close surveillance and treatment of these lesions will help improve the survival rates of patients with HCC. The rapid development and extensive application of imaging technology have facilitated the discovery of nodular lesions of ambiguous significance, such as dysplastic nodules. Further investigations showed that these nodules may be hepatic precancerous lesions, and they often appear in patients with liver cirrhosis. Although the morphology of these nodules is not sufficient to support a diagnosis of malignant tumor, these nodules are closely correlated with the occurrence of HCC, as indicated by long-term follow-up studies. In recent years, the rapid development and wide application of pathology, molecular genetics and imaging technology have elucidated the characteristics of precancerous lesions. Based on our extensive review of the relevant literature, this article focuses on evidence indicating that high-grade dysplastic nodules are more likely to transform into HCC than low-grade dysplastic nodules based on clinical, pathological, molecular genetic and radiological assessments. In addition, evidence supporting the precancerous nature of large cell change in hepatitis B virus-related HCC is discussed.
Core tip: The identification and characteristics of hepatic precancerous lesions may serve as early clues to malignant transformation. Over the last 10 years, studies of precancerous lesions have resulted in significant progress, especially in molecular biology and imaging technology. Based on our extensive review of the relevant literature, this article focuses on evidence that supports the precancerous nature of dysplastic foci and dysplastic nodules from a clinical, pathological, molecular genetic and radiological point of view.
- Citation: Niu ZS, Niu XJ, Wang WH, Zhao J. Latest developments in precancerous lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(12): 3305-3314
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i12/3305.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3305
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death around the world, and it is clinically characterized by a high incidence rate and poor prognosis. Despite the progress made in numerous treatments, the survival rate of HCC patients remains low because HCC is not easily detected prior to the advanced stage. Therefore, studies on the nature of precancerous lesions of HCC are important.
Hepatic precancerous lesions are currently recognized as nodular lesions that result from cirrhosis, and they are divided into two levels based on cytological and histological changes: microscopic dysplastic foci (DF) and macroscopic dysplastic nodules (DNs). DF are further classified as exhibiting large cell change (LCC) or small cell change (SCC)[1], the latter of which is widely observed in various precancerous lesions[2,3]. Specifically, molecular biology studies have shown SCC to be an intermediary stage between hepatocytes and malignant cells. DNs are further subdivided into low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDNs) and high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs) based on the degree of atypia[4], and the latter has a higher risk of malignant transformation.
Recent advances in pathology, molecular biology, genetics, and radiology have tremendously improved our understanding of hepatic precancerous lesions. Based on our extensive review of the relevant literature, this article focuses on the evidence showing that HGDNs are more likely to transform into HCC than LGDNs based on clinical, pathological, molecular genetic and radiological assessments.
DF are microscopic lesions with an arbitrary diameter less than 1 mm, and they usually occur in a background of cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis[4]. DF often exhibit LCC (Figure 1A) or SCC (Figure 1B). According to a recent study[5], LCC is defined as hepatocytes displaying enlarged nuclei or cytoplasms that preserve their nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, whereas SCC is defined as hepatocytes that exhibit decreased cytoplasmic volume, cytoplasmic basophilia, mild nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, and an increased nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio. Consequently, lesions with SCC are characterized by crowded nuclei and an increased cellular density.
LCC is currently thought to be a degenerative senescent change that results from chronic liver injury, but it could also be regarded as a predictive marker associated with HCC rather than a genuine premalignant lesion[6,7]. Conversely, LCC may actually be an important risk factor for HCC based on the following findings: (1) The patients with chronic hepatitis B exhibiting LCC were overall much more likely to develop HCC than patients without LCC[8]; (2) In most cases of human B viral chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis, hepatocytes exhibiting LCC had higher levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-labelling index (LI) and lower levels of transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL)-LI than cells without LCC[9], which suggests that HBV-related LCC is actively involved in hepatocarcinogenesis; (3) Abnormal DNA content (aneuploidy) is common in LCC, but this abnormality does not significantly differ from that observed in SCC[10]; (4) LCC and related molecular changes have been identified in a subset of patients infected with HBV, which suggests a direct premalignancy[11]; and (5) Compared with cholestatic LCC, HBV-related LCC exhibits significantly higher Tp53-LI, gamma-H2AX-LI and micronuclei index as well as shorter telomere length, decreased SA-beta-Gal activity and increased net cellular gain[12].
LCC is frequently detected in chronic hepatitis B cases with advanced histologic stage, particularly those with HCC[6]. Taken together, these findings indicate that LCC may not only be related to hepatocarcinogenesis but may be a precancerous lesion of HBV-related HCC.
SCC has long been thought to be a characteristic of early precancerous lesions of HCC based on the following findings: (1) SCC has frequently been identified in HGDNs and well-differentiated HCC (W-HCC). Specifically, the largest nuclei have been observed in W-HCC, and the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio is higher in HGDNs and W-HCC than in other nodular lesions. Moreover, hyperchromasia is markedly more pronounced in W-HCC than in other nodules[2]; (2) Mosaicism for loss of X chromosomal inactivation has been demonstrated in nodules of altered hepatocytes (NAH) exhibiting SCC, and an array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) analysis revealed that some of the chromosomal abnormalities in NAH with SCC coincided with the abnormalities in HCC[3], suggesting that NAH exhibiting SCC could be precursors of HCC; and (3) SCC is characterized by high proliferative activity[13]. Conversely, the cumulative probability of developing HCC did not differ between patients with SCC and those without SCC in one study[8], suggesting that SCC in chronic hepatitis B should not be considered a risk factor for HCC development.
Surprisingly, a crosscheck of the literature revealed inconsistent or contradictory conclusions, even from the same group of authors, between different studies of the same marker. In one study[14], the expression of p21 and p16 in HBV/HCV-related cirrhosis was preserved in LCC, decreased in SCC, and absent in HCC, whereas gammaH2AX-DNA-damage foci were absent in LCC but present in SCC and in HCC. These data suggest that SCC occurs in more advanced precancerous lesions than LCC. In another study[12], the same group of authors found that p21 and p16 were activated in normal-looking cirrhotic hepatocytes (NLCH) of HBV-related cirrhosis and that this expression gradually diminished from LCC to SCC and HCC. They also reported that the expression of gamma-H2AX foci significantly increased during carcinogenesis, from normal hepatocytes to NLCH, LCC, SCC, and HCC. Thus, these data contradict the previous findings and suggest that HBV-related LCC may represent dysplastic hepatocytes rather than reactive hepatocytes. These conflicting findings may be attributed to the use of different racial and regional groups, i.e., HBV (17 cases)/HCV (6 cases)-related cirrhosis samples in the former study and HBV-related cirrhosis samples in the latter study.
The nature of LCC and SCC as characteristics of true precancerous lesions and their relationship to HCC are fiercely debated[1]. Future studies should consider the following factors, which at least partly explain the inconsistency, if not conflict, in previous findings: SCC is a relatively rare finding that could easily be confused with liver regenerative cells. In some studies, the diagnosis of SCC was confirmed by fewer than two pathologists or the authors failed to give a definition and/or example of DF[15,16]. Therefore, SCC is not easily distinguished from liver regenerative cells based on current findings, which may limit the predictive value of SCC for HCC development[17]. Discrepancies in studies may also be due to differences in research methodology and regional groups under study.
Based on current studies, SCC may be a more advanced precancerous lesion than LCC, and LCC may be a very early precancerous lesion of HBV-related HCC. Accordingly, the identification of SCC and LCC in liver biopsies might be related to an increased risk of HCC over time, and such lesions warrant inclusion in pathology reports[18].
Dysplastic nodules are usually found in chronic liver diseases. These lesions are primarily 1-1.5 cm in diameter and are classified as LGDNs (Figure 1C) or HGDNs (Figure 1D) based on the presence of cytologic and architectural atypia[19]. Pathologically, human HCC develops in the following multistep manner: from LGDNs to HGDNs, early HCC, W-HCC, nodule-in-nodule HCC, and finally, moderately differentiated HCC[20]. In recent years, the concept of multi-step human hepatocarcinogenesis has been well documented[21-23]. Advances in pathology and molecular genetics, as well as clinical follow-ups, have confirmed that DNs are precancerous lesions of HCC[4,24]. In particular, advances in medical imaging technology have provided a more intuitive understanding of the characteristics of DNs by facilitating the detection of such small nodular lesions.
For many years, HGDNs have been thought to be more closely related to HCC than LGDNs based on histopathological features and clinical follow-up studies[2,25,26]. In recent years, advances in pathology, molecular genetics, and imaging have further confirmed that HGDNs are more likely the advanced precursors of HCC than LGDNs[2,27]. The main pathological, molecular genetic and radiological features of distinction between LGDNs and HGDNs are summarized in Table 1.
LGDNs | HGDNs | e/WD-HCC | Quoted literature examples | |
Cytologic features | ||||
Small cell change | - | + | + | Roncalli et al[30] |
Large cell change | ± | ± | - | Roncalli et al[30] |
Architectural features | ||||
Nuclear/cyto-plasmic ratio | ± | + | + | Chang et al[2] |
Increased cell density compared with surroundings | - | 1.3 to 2 times | > 2 times or more | Park et al[4] |
Pseudoglands | - | ± | + | Nascimento et al[31] |
Unpaired arteries | ± | ± | + | Park et al[4] |
Portal tract | - | + | + | Kojiro et al[32] |
Hyperchromasia/nuclear atypia | - | + | + | Nascimento et al[31] |
Radiological features | ||||
Hepatobiliary phase images | No hypointensity | Hypointensity (70%) | Hypointensity (97.5%) | Gatto et al[40] |
Arterial phase | Iso/hyperintensity (100%) | Iso/hypointense (96.7%) | Iso/hypointense (27.5%) | Gatto et al[40] |
Washout and arterial enhancement | No washout or arterial enhancement on CT or MRI | 6 (6/6 )showed arterial enhancement on CT, 4 (4/6) were hypervascular on MRI; 5 (5/6) on CT and 4 (4/6) on MRI | 51 (51/74) were hypervascular on CT, 57 (57/74) were hypervascular on MRI; washout was not showed | Serste et al[25] |
Molecular genetic biomarkers | ||||
Overall FAL index | 0.16 ± 0.07 | 0.33 ± 0.21 | 0.40 ± 0.23 | Lee et al[27] |
Chromosomal changes | Deletions and gains were not found | Deletions of 8p and gains of 1q | Deletions of 8p and gains of 1q | Tornillo et al[45] |
TERT promoter mutations | 6% | 19% | 61% | Nault et al[50] |
TRF length | 7.2 ± 1.97 | 4.0 ± 0.89 | 4.5 ± 0.85 | Oh et al[53] |
Telomerase activity | 0.9 ± 0.56 | 1.7 ± 0.75 | 2.3 ± 1.39 | Oh et al[53] |
miRNAs (miR-224) | - | + (50%) | + (100%) | Gao et al[57] |
DNA methylation Nuclear expression of Dnmt3a | - | + (29.2%) | + (53.8%) | Choi et al[62] |
Immunohistological biomarkers | ||||
VEGF | ± (100%) | + (100%) | + (100%) | Park et al[67] |
GPC3 | ± (5.48%) | + (50%) | + (57.1%) | Gong et al[1] |
MN index (number of micronuclei per 3000 hepatocytes) | 0.9 ± 0.16 | 3.1 ± 0.38 | 4.0 ± 0.58 | Lee et al[77] |
Clinically, LGDNs are considered precancerous lesions associated with a slightly elevated risk of malignant transformation, whereas HGDNs are considered advanced precursors of HCC associated with a high risk of transformation[4,28]. Moreover, HCCs have been demonstrated to occur more frequently in HGDNs than LGDNs[29].
Clinical follow-up studies have revealed that HGDNs are the most advanced precancerous lesions of the liver, with a risk of malignant transformation of approximately 30%-40% at 24 mo[24]. In another study, a total of 147 patients with non-malignant liver nodules were followed over a median duration of 29 mo, and the HCC development rate was higher in patients with HGDNs than in patients with LGDNs[26]. Based on a multivariate analysis of histologic diagnosis and decreases in portal flow on computed tomographic arterial portography (CT-AP), the authors classified hepatic nodules into three groups: HGDNs, LGDNs, and regenerative nodules (RNs). The progression rate of HCC from HGDNs was high, and the annual HCC development rate exceeded 30% in the first 2 years. HCC developed more often from HGDNs than from LGDNs and RNs[28]. Therefore, HGDNs are true precancerous lesions of HCC.
Compared with HGDNs, LGDNs lack appreciable cytologic and architectural atypia based on the following findings: (1) LCC is frequently observed inside and outside of LGDNs as microscopic (< 1 mm) DF. SCC is most frequently seen inside HGDNs[30]; (2) The nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio is higher in HGDNs and W-HCC than in LGDNs[2]; (3) HGDNs and HCC exhibit more pronounced basophilia in the cytoplasm than large regenerative nodules (LRNs) and LGDNs[31]; (4) Hyperchromasia and nuclear atypia are observed in HGDNs and HCC[31]; (5) A pseudoacinar pattern (or acinar formation) and thickened trabeculae are never seen in LGDNs but frequently appear in HGDNs and HCC[31]; and (6) The number of portal tracts is normal in LGDNs but reduced in HGDNs and early HCCs[32]. In addition, some HGDNs often contain one or more microscopic foci of W-HCC, whereas nodule-in-nodule lesions are absent in LGDNs, which suggests that HGDNs might be precancerous lesions of HCC[20,33,34]. In conclusion, these histopathologic features indicate that HGDNs represent borderline lesions and closely resemble W-HCCs[35].
Angiogenesis, such as sinusoidal capillarization and unpaired arteries, gradually increases during hepatocarcinogenesis from HGDNs to classic hypervascular HCC[36]. Compared with LGDNs, HGDNs and W-HCC contain more aberrant unpaired arterioles and capillarized sinusoids[25].
Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to improve the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Specifically, this approach can differentiate LGDNs from pre-malignant HGDNs and early HCC[37].
The hypointense appearance in hepatobiliary phase is often considered a radiological marker of nodule differentiation[38]. The Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI findings of nodules (LGDNs, HGDNs, and HCCs), which were histologically identified on cirrhotic and explanted livers, indicated nodular hypointensity at the hepatobiliary (HB) phase in 39/40 HCCs and 21/30 HGDNs but in none of the LGDNs, despite a lack of significant differences among the enhancement ratios (ERs) of HGDNs and HCCs at the HB phase[39]. Another study examined the ability of delayed phase imaging (DPI) gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in addition to dynamic postcontrast imaging to improve the characterization of small HCCs, HGDNs and LGDNs. This study identified significant qualitative and quantitative differences in the hypointensity on DPI between LGDNs and the group consisting of HGDNs and HCCs[40].
In one study, 62 of 215 nodules exhibited atypical radiological behavior (atypical nodules refer to a lack of hypervascularization in the arterial phase and/or absent hypovasculature in portal phase[38]), and 19 out of 20 HGDNs/early HCC nodules were found to be hypointense in the HB phase[41]. Most HGDNs (20/30) were reported to be iso/hypointense in the arterial phase and hypointense in the late phase, where all LGDNs were characterized by iso/hyperintensity in both the arterial and late phases. The ERs of lesions did not significantly quantitatively differ between hypovascular HCCs and HGDNs in the arterial phase or between hypointense HCCs and HGDNs in the HB phase[39].
In addition, patients with chronic liver disease showing a hypointense hypovascular nodule in the liver on hepatocyte-phase Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI are at a high risk of developing HCC[42]. Therefore, HGDNs, which represent hypointense hypovascular nodules, could be precancerous lesions of HCC.
In one study, washout was observed in 5 HGDNs (5/6) on CT and in 4 HGDNs (4/6) on MRI, whereas washout or arterial enhancement was not observed in patients with LGDNs[25]. In another study, the frequency of washout increased to 93.8% (45/48) in HCCs and 69.3% (9/13) in HGDNs in cirrhotic livers, and these incidences were higher than that of arterial enhancement[43]. These findings suggest that lesions exhibiting washout or arterial enhancement in the cirrhotic liver may be malignant nodules.
Furthermore, arterial hypervascularization with washout in subcentimeter hypointense nodules in the HB phase on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in patients with chronic liver disease has been shown to strongly correlate with progression to hypervascular HCC[44].
Therefore, the imaging differences between HGDNs and LGDNs indicate that HGDNs are closely associated with progression to HCC and likely are more advanced precursors of HCC than LGDNs.
Allelic losses in some regions were found to be correlated to clinicopathologic features and HCC progression[27]. The overall fractional allelic loss (FAL) index represents the frequency of allelic losses.
Genome-wide allelotyping has been adopted to systematically evaluate allelic changes during hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. Specifically, these studies found that the overall FAL index of HGDNs was significantly higher than that of LGDNs and was very close to that of HCCs[27]. This result indicates that HGDNs are genetically closer to HCC in terms of allelic losses, suggesting that their biological behavior likely resembles that of early HCC. Another group of researchers investigated the genetic differences between macroregenerative nodules (MRNs), LGDNs, and HGDNs via comparative genomic hybridization and found that although allelic losses of 8p and gains of 1q were observed in three out of six HGDNs, chromosomal imbalances between LGDNs and MRNs were absent[45]. In addition, the array CGH analysis revealed that HGDNs and HCCs exhibited a loss of heterozygosity at 5q13.2 and 8p23.1[46], which suggests that the genetic changes in HGDNs and HCCs are similar. Overall, these studies provide genetic evidence to support the idea that HGDNs are precancerous lesions.
Telomerase reverse-transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations are the most frequent somatic genetic alterations in human HCC arising from both cirrhotic and normal livers. They are major early events in tumorigenesis that occur at the precancerous stages in cirrhosis[47-49]. One study found that TERT promoter mutations were highly correlated with hepatocarcinogenesis: mutations were identified in 6% of LGDNs, 19% of HGDNs, 61% of early HCCs and 42% of small and progressive HCCs[50].
In addition, the human TERT (hTERT) mRNA levels, as measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR, positively correlated with hepatocarcinogenesis, and a significant induction in the transition between LGDNs and HGDNs was observed. Most HGDNs strongly expressed hTERT mRNA at levels similar to those of HCCs[51].
Telomerase expression and the maintenance of a critical telomere length (TL) in cancer initiation indicate that telomere shortening and telomerase expression initiate cancer by inducing chromosomal instability[52]. Several studies have demonstrated that many HGDNs have shorter telomeres and a higher telomerase activity (TA) than LGDNs, and the TL and TA in HGDNs are similar to those of DNs with HCC foci and HCCs[53,54]. These results suggest that HGDNs are more similar to HCCs than LGDNs.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA molecules that are thought to play an important role in the regulation of gene expression[55]. A growing body of evidence indicates that the deregulation of miRNAs plays a crucial role in hepatocarcinogenesis[56]. Specifically, some miRNAs, such as miR-145 and miR-199b, are downregulated in the progression from LGDNs to small HCC; miR-224 showed no expression in LGDNs, moderate expression in HGDNs, and strong expression in small HCCs[57,58]. These results suggest that LGDNs are early lesions in the spectrum of hepatocarcinogenesis and that HGDNs could be considered advanced precursors of HCC within this spectrum.
Epigenetic changes are reversible and heritable and include changes in DNA methylation. Aberrant epigenetic modifications occur at the earliest stages of neoplastic transformation and are now believed to be essential players in cancer initiation and progression[59]. The aberrant DNA methylation of CpG islands is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). In human hepatocarcinogenesis, the expression levels of DNMT1, DNMT3a and DNMT3b mRNAs progressively increase from LGDNs to HGDNs, HCCs in DNs, and advanced HCCs[60], suggesting that DNMTs are involved in hepatocarcinogenesis and that HGDNs may be more advanced precancerous lesions than LGDNs.
DNMT3A: DNMT3A may play a role in hepatocellular carcinogenesis by regulating the expression of some tumor-suppressor genes, such as PTEN[61]. Specifically, nuclear immunoreactivity to Dnmt3a has not been detected in non-neoplastic livers or LGDNs but was observed in some HGDNs and HCCs[62].
Ras association domain family 1 isoform A: Ras association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) is a tumor suppressor that is methylated in many human cancers, including HCC[63]. As human hepatocarcinogenesis progresses from chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis to LGDNs, HGDNs, and finally, HCC, the expression of RASSF1A tends to gradually decrease[63]. Moreover, aberrant DNA methylation and increased DNMT expression have been demonstrated to be features of tumor cells[64]. Overall, the above-mentioned findings indicate that HGDNs share some features with HCC and are precancerous lesions of HCC.
Angiogenesis refers to the process of blood vessel formation, and all tumors require new blood vessels to grow. Evidence from human studies suggests that angiogenesis is not necessarily a characteristic of an invasive tumor but may be an early event during the pre-malignant stages of cancer[65]. Angiogenesis may be stimulated by several regulators, among which vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) seems to be the most important one[66]. The expression of VEGF is higher in HGDNs and early HCCs than in LGDNs[67], which suggests that VEGF expression may be a good indicator of precancerous changes and may be useful to better understand and prevent the transformation of HGDNs to HCC.
Glypican-3 (GPC3) is an oncofetal protein that plays a key role in growth factor signaling to regulate the proliferative activity of cancer cells[68]. Several recent studies have demonstrated high GPC3 protein expression in HCC but not in hepatic para-carcinomatous and cirrhotic tissues[69-72], indicating that GPC3 may be used as an immunohistochemistry marker to differentiate HCC from benign hepatocyte nodules[73]. To date, several studies have reported higher GPC3 protein expression in HGDNs than in LGDNs[1,74,75]. These results suggest that GPC3-positive DNs, especially GPC3-positive HGDNs, are indeed precancerous lesions of HCC[74].
Chromosomal damage and the formation of a micronucleus (MN) are believed to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of many malignancies[76]. An MN is a small nucleus, and increases in the formation of MNs are usually regarded as an indicator of chromosomal damage. In one study, the micronuclei index was significantly increased in HGDNs compared with LGDNs. HCC exhibited the highest micronuclei index compared with those of HGDNs and DNs with HCC foci[77]. Therefore, the micronuclei index may transition from LGDNs to HGDNs, DNs with HCC foci and HCC, suggesting that HGDNs harbor more chromosome damage than LGDNs during hepatocarcinogenesis.
For many years, the differentiation of dysplastic lesions, particularly HGDNs, from early HCC has been a challenge for clinicians, radiologists and pathologists. A variety of imaging modalities are currently used to evaluate patients with chronic liver disease and suspected HCC. Of these modalities, CT, MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) have largely replaced biopsy for the diagnosis of HCC[78]. However, all imaging techniques may fail to detect and diagnose small HCCs, particularly in the presence of cirrhosis[79]. The detection and diagnosis of small nodules, such as DNs, by imaging techniques are also very difficult.
DNs are generally hypovascular in the arterial phase, but they can sometimes be hypervascular without “washout’’ during the portal/late phases of CEUS[80]. Therefore, imaging findings on CEUS overlap between DNs and W-HCCs[81]. HCC or HGDNs can be noninvasively diagnosed if arterial enhancement and washout are found in a single dynamic imaging examination; however, these findings are frequently discordant on both CT and MRI[25]. CEUS can be effectively used as a useful problem-solving method by utilizing its unique advantages when CT and MRI are contraindicated or their results are indeterminate[82]. Similarly, nodules considered indeterminate after CEUS have been evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI for diagnosis[83,84]. Despite the above-mentioned merits of these imaging modalities, the differentiation between “early’’ HCC and an HGDN using only imaging techniques is sometimes difficult[80]. Moreover, a recent study recommends performing a biopsy rather than additional imaging when the first imaging is inconclusive[25].
DNs, especially HGDNs, are borderline lesions, and the biopsy of DNs is associated with a high rate of false-negative findings due to histological heterogeneity within the nodules[85]. Therefore, differentiating from HGDNs based on a small biopsy specimen may be difficult or nearly impossible[86]. Consequently, the identification of potential biomarkers that reliably detect or diagnose HGDNs or early HCC is urgently needed.
An increasing body of evidence suggests that epigenetic changes contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis. Therefore, DNA methylation and miRNAs have been proposed as promising biomarkers[87]. Specifically, changes in DNA methylation are ubiquitous in human cancer and have been shown to occur early during carcinogenesis. As such, these changes may serve as biomarkers for the detection of HGDNs or early HCC[88]. The frequency of aberrant promoter methylation has been confirmed to increase during the progression from precancerous lesion to HCC[89]. Therefore, DNA methylation in precancerous or early neoplastic stages may serve as a biomarker for screening patients with an increased risk for HCC and detecting early cancer. Moreover, the deregulation of miRNAs plays an important role in human carcinogenesis. For example, the down-regulation of miR-145 and miR-199b and up-regulation of miR-224 are frequently observed in pre-malignant DNs, and these changes persist throughout HCC development[57], suggesting that miRNA expression may serve as a biomarker for the detection of HGDNs or early HCC.
However, the above-mentioned biomarkers are tissue markers for detecting HGDNs or early HCC in liver biopsy specimens. In other words, a biomarker will be useful for screening or the early detection of cancer only if it can be detected in a noninvasive or minimally invasive fashion without tissue biopsy[88].
Increasing evidence has verified that DNA methylation and miRNAs in the blood or other bodily fluids may serve as valuable biomarkers for the detection of early HCC[90]. Hopefully, DNA methylation or miRNAs in the blood will be translated into clinical use in the near future, which would facilitate the early diagnosis of at-risk patients and the accurate assessment of disease progression[87]. In addition, when combined with imaging contrast, blood biomarkers will significantly enhance our ability to diagnose HGDNs or early HCC and screen patients who are at carcinogenetic risk. These advances would allow patients to receive early treatment and ultimately improve survival.
P- Reviewer: Gulley ML, Troncoso MF, Vaidya MM S- Editor: Yu J L- Editor: Wang TQ E- Editor: Zhang DN
1. | Gong L, Wei LX, Ren P, Zhang WD, Liu XY, Han XJ, Yao L, Zhu SJ, Lan M, Li YH. Dysplastic nodules with glypican-3 positive immunostaining: a risk for early hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87120. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Chang O, Yano Y, Masuzawa A, Fukushima N, Teramura K, Hayashi Y. The cytological characteristics of small cell change of dysplasia in small hepatic nodules. Oncol Rep. 2010;23:1229-1232. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
3. | Gong L, Li YH, Su Q, Chu X, Zhang W. Clonality of nodular lesions in liver cirrhosis and chromosomal abnormalities in monoclonal nodules of altered hepatocytes. Histopathology. 2010;56:589-599. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Park YN. Update on precursor and early lesions of hepatocellular carcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:704-715. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Wee A. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma and related hepatocellular nodular lesions in cirrhosis: controversies, challenges, and expectations. Patholog Res Int. 2011;2011:587936. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Ikeda H, Sasaki M, Sato Y, Harada K, Zen Y, Mitsui T, Nakanuma Y. Large cell change of hepatocytes in chronic viral hepatitis represents a senescent-related lesion. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:1774-1782. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Libbrecht L, Desmet V, Roskams T. Preneoplastic lesions in human hepatocarcinogenesis. Liver Int. 2005;25:16-27. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
8. | Koo JS, Kim H, Park BK, Ahn SH, Han KH, Chon CY, Park C, Park YN. Predictive value of liver cell dysplasia for development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:738-743. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Koo JS, Seong JK, Park C, Yu DY, Oh BK, Oh SH, Park YN. Large liver cell dysplasia in hepatitis B virus x transgenic mouse liver and human chronic hepatitis B virus-infected liver. Intervirology. 2005;48:16-22. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
10. | El-Sayed SS, El-Sadany M, Tabll AA, Soltan A, El-Dosoky I, Attallah AM. DNA ploidy and liver cell dysplasia in liver biopsies from patients with liver cirrhosis. Can J Gastroenterol. 2004;18:87-91. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
11. | Hudacko R, Theise N. Liver biopsies in chronic viral hepatitis: beyond grading and staging. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:1320-1328. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Kim H, Oh BK, Roncalli M, Park C, Yoon SM, Yoo JE, Park YN. Large liver cell change in hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2009;50:752-762. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 59] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59] [Article Influence: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Koskinas J, Petraki K, Kavantzas N, Rapti I, Kountouras D, Hadziyannis S. Hepatic expression of the proliferative marker Ki-67 and p53 protein in HBV or HCV cirrhosis in relation to dysplastic liver cell changes and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Viral Hepat. 2005;12:635-641. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
14. | Plentz RR, Park YN, Lechel A, Kim H, Nellessen F, Langkopf BH, Wilkens L, Destro A, Fiamengo B, Manns MP. Telomere shortening and inactivation of cell cycle checkpoints characterize human hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2007;45:968-976. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
15. | Degos F, Christidis C, Ganne-Carrie N, Farmachidi JP, Degott C, Guettier C, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M, Chevret S. Hepatitis C virus related cirrhosis: time to occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and death. Gut. 2000;47:131-136. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
16. | Donato MF, Arosio E, Del Ninno E, Ronchi G, Lampertico P, Morabito A, Balestrieri MR, Colombo M. High rates of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with high liver cell proliferative activity. Hepatology. 2001;34:523-528. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
17. | Theise ND, Curado MP, Franceschi S, Hytiroglou P, Kudo M, Park YN, Sakamoto M, Torbenson M, Wee A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, 4th ed. Lyon: IARC 2010; 205-216. [Cited in This Article: ] |
18. | Park YN. Hepatobiliary/Pancreas Pathology: SY11-1 hepatocellular dysplasia: large and small cell changes. Pathology. 2014;46 Suppl 2:S23. [Cited in This Article: ] |
19. | Sakamoto M, Effendi K, Masugi Y. Molecular diagnosis of multistage hepatocarcinogenesis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:891-896. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Kudo M. Multistep human hepatocarcinogenesis: correlation of imaging with pathology. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44 Suppl 19:112-118. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 163] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 172] [Article Influence: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Marquardt JU, Seo D, Andersen JB, Gillen MC, Kim MS, Conner EA, Galle PR, Factor VM, Park YN, Thorgeirsson SS. Sequential transcriptome analysis of human liver cancer indicates late stage acquisition of malignant traits. J Hepatol. 2014;60:346-353. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
22. | Kobayashi S, Matsui O, Gabata T, Koda W, Minami T, Ryu Y, Kozaka K, Kitao A. Intranodular signal intensity analysis of hypovascular high-risk borderline lesions of HCC that illustrate multi-step hepatocarcinogenesis within the nodule on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3839-3845. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Um TH, Kim H, Oh BK, Kim MS, Kim KS, Jung G, Park YN. Aberrant CpG island hypermethylation in dysplastic nodules and early HCC of hepatitis B virus-related human multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol. 2011;54:939-947. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 126] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 137] [Article Influence: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Di Tommaso L, Sangiovanni A, Borzio M, Park YN, Farinati F, Roncalli M. Advanced precancerous lesions in the liver. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27:269-284. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 42] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Sersté T, Barrau V, Ozenne V, Vullierme MP, Bedossa P, Farges O, Valla DC, Vilgrain V, Paradis V, Degos F. Accuracy and disagreement of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules: role of biopsy. Hepatology. 2012;55:800-806. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 117] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123] [Article Influence: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Ng CH, Chan SW, Lee WK, Lai L, Lok KH, Li KK, Luk SH, Szeto ML. Hepatocarcinogenesis of regenerative and dysplastic nodules in Chinese patients. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17:11-19. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
27. | Lee JM, Wong CM, Ng IO. Hepatitis B virus-associated multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: a stepwise increase in allelic alterations. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5988-5996. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Kobayashi M, Ikeda K, Hosaka T, Sezaki H, Someya T, Akuta N, Suzuki F, Suzuki Y, Saitoh S, Arase Y. Dysplastic nodules frequently develop into hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral hepatitis and cirrhosis. Cancer. 2006;106:636-647. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
29. | Iavarone M, Manini MA, Sangiovanni A, Fraquelli M, Forzenigo LV, Di Tommaso L, Aghemo A, Roncalli M, Ronchi G, Colombo M. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasound-guided liver biopsy to diagnose dysplastic liver nodules in cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:43-49. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
30. | Roncalli M, Terracciano L, Di Tommaso L, David E, Colombo M. Liver precancerous lesions and hepatocellular carcinoma: the histology report. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43 Suppl 4:S361-S372. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 42] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Nascimento C, Bottino A, Nogueira C, Pannain V. Analysis of morphological variables and arterialization in the differential diagnosis of hepatic nodules in explanted cirrhotic livers. Diagn Pathol. 2007;2:51. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
32. | Kojiro M, Roskams T. Early hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25:133-142. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
33. | Roskams T, Kojiro M. Pathology of early hepatocellular carcinoma: conventional and molecular diagnosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30:17-25. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 126] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 132] [Article Influence: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
34. | International Consensus Group for Hepatocellular NeoplasiaThe International Consensus Group for Hepatocellular Neoplasia. Pathologic diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of the international consensus group for hepatocellular neoplasia. Hepatology. 2009;49:658-664. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 610] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 562] [Article Influence: 37.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
35. | Roncalli M, Borzio M, Di Tommaso L. Hepatocellular dysplastic nodules. Hepatol Res. 2007;37 Suppl 2:S125-S134. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
36. | Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Sanada J, Kouda W, Ryu Y, Kozaka K, Kitao A, Nakamura K, Gabata T. Hepatocelluar nodules in liver cirrhosis: hemodynamic evaluation (angiography-assisted CT) with special reference to multi-step hepatocarcinogenesis. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36:264-272. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 139] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 155] [Article Influence: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
37. | Merkle EM, Zech CJ, Bartolozzi C, Bashir MR, Ba-Ssalamah A, Huppertz A, Lee JM, Ricke J, Sakamoto M, Sirlin CB. Consensus report from the 7th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:674-682. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
38. | Palmucci S. Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI. World J Hepatol. 2014;6:477-485. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
39. | Bartolozzi C, Battaglia V, Bargellini I, Bozzi E, Campani D, Pollina LE, Filipponi F. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of 102 nodules in cirrhosis: correlation with histological findings on explanted livers. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38:290-296. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 81] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76] [Article Influence: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
40. | Gatto A, De Gaetano AM, Giuga M, Ciresa M, Siciliani L, Miele L, Riccardi L, Pizzolante F, Rapaccini GL, Gasbarrini A. Differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38:736-744. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
41. | Golfieri R, Renzulli M, Lucidi V, Corcioni B, Trevisani F, Bolondi L. Contribution of the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to Dynamic MRI in the detection of hypovascular small (≤ 2 cm) HCC in cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1233-1242. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 152] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 167] [Article Influence: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
42. | Ichikawa S, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, Sano K, Morisaka H, Enomoto N, Matsuda M, Fujii H, Araki T. Presence of a hypovascular hepatic nodule showing hypointensity on hepatocyte-phase image is a risk factor for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39:293-297. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
43. | Chen ML, Zhang XY, Qi LP, Shi QL, Chen B, Sun YS. Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) without ADC values in assessment of small focal nodules in cirrhotic liver. Chin J Cancer Res. 2014;26:38-47. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
44. | Jang KM, Kim SH, Kim YK, Choi D. Imaging features of subcentimeter hypointense nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging that progress to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:526-535. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
45. | Tornillo L, Carafa V, Sauter G, Moch H, Minola E, Gambacorta M, Vecchione R, Bianchi L, Terracciano LM. Chromosomal alterations in hepatocellular nodules by comparative genomic hybridization: high-grade dysplastic nodules represent early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma. Lab Invest. 2002;82:547-553. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
46. | Zhao Z, Chen GY, Long J, Li H, Huang J. Genomic losses at 5q13.2 and 8p23.1 in dysplastic hepatocytes are common events in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2015;9:2839-2846. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
47. | Nault JC, Mallet M, Pilati C, Calderaro J, Bioulac-Sage P, Laurent C, Laurent A, Cherqui D, Balabaud C, Zucman-Rossi J. High frequency of telomerase reverse-transcriptase promoter somatic mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma and preneoplastic lesions. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2218. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 414] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 606] [Article Influence: 60.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
48. | Quaas A, Oldopp T, Tharun L, Klingenfeld C, Krech T, Sauter G, Grob TJ. Frequency of TERT promoter mutations in primary tumors of the liver. Virchows Arch. 2014;465:673-677. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
49. | Pinyol R, Tovar V, Llovet JM. TERT promoter mutations: gatekeeper and driver of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;61:685-687. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
50. | Nault JC, Calderaro J, Di Tommaso L, Balabaud C, Zafrani ES, Bioulac-Sage P, Roncalli M, Zucman-Rossi J. Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation is an early somatic genetic alteration in the transformation of premalignant nodules in hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2014;60:1983-1992. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 219] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 239] [Article Influence: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
51. | Oh BK, Kim YJ, Park YN, Choi J, Kim KS, Park C. Quantitative assessment of hTERT mRNA expression in dysplastic nodules of HBV-related hepatocarcinogenesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:831-838. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
52. | Saini N, Srinivasan R, Chawla Y, Sharma S, Chakraborti A, Rajwanshi A. Telomerase activity, telomere length and human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression in hepatocellular carcinoma is independent of hepatitis virus status. Liver Int. 2009;29:1162-1170. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
53. | Oh BK, Jo Chae K, Park C, Kim K, Jung Lee W, Han KH, Nyun Park Y. Telomere shortening and telomerase reactivation in dysplastic nodules of human hepatocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol. 2003;39:786-792. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
54. | Oh BK, Kim YJ, Park C, Park YN. Up-regulation of telomere-binding proteins, TRF1, TRF2, and TIN2 is related to telomere shortening during human multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2005;166:73-80. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
55. | Takasaki S. Roles of microRNAs in cancers and development. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1218:375-413. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
56. | Otsuka M, Kishikawa T, Yoshikawa T, Ohno M, Takata A, Shibata C, Koike K. The role of microRNAs in hepatocarcinogenesis: current knowledge and future prospects. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:173-184. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
57. | Gao P, Wong CC, Tung EK, Lee JM, Wong CM, Ng IO. Deregulation of microRNA expression occurs early and accumulates in early stages of HBV-associated multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. J Hepatol. 2011;54:1177-1184. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 110] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 119] [Article Influence: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
58. | Tan YL, Chen WN. MicroRNAs as therapeutic strategy for hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future prospects. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5973-5986. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
59. | Dong Y, Wang A. Aberrant DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma tumor suppression (Review). Oncol Lett. 2014;8:963-968. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
60. | Oh BK, Kim H, Park HJ, Shim YH, Choi J, Park C, Park YN. DNA methyltransferase expression and DNA methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma and their clinicopathological correlation. Int J Mol Med. 2007;20:65-73. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
61. | Zhao Z, Wu Q, Cheng J, Qiu X, Zhang J, Fan H. Depletion of DNMT3A suppressed cell proliferation and restored PTEN in hepatocellular carcinoma cell. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:737535. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
62. | Choi MS, Shim YH, Hwa JY, Lee SK, Ro JY, Kim JS, Yu E. Expression of DNA methyltransferases in multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. Hum Pathol. 2003;34:11-17. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
63. | Ahn EY, Kim JS, Kim GJ, Park YN. RASSF1A-mediated regulation of AREG via the Hippo pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2013;11:748-758. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
64. | Park HJ, Yu E, Shim YH. DNA methyltransferase expression and DNA hypermethylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2006;233:271-278. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
65. | Menakuru SR, Brown NJ, Staton CA, Reed MW. Angiogenesis in pre-malignant conditions. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:1961-1966. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
66. | Sobczyńska-Rak A, Polkowska I, Silmanowicz P. Elevated Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) levels in the blood serum of dogs with malignant neoplasms of the oral cavity. Acta Vet Hung. 2014;62:362-371. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
67. | Park YN, Kim YB, Yang KM, Park C. Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in the early stage of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:1061-1065. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
68. | Wasfy RE, Shams Eldeen AA. Roles of Combined Glypican-3 and Glutamine Synthetase in Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Lesions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:4769-4775. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
69. | Shirakawa H, Suzuki H, Shimomura M, Kojima M, Gotohda N, Takahashi S, Nakagohri T, Konishi M, Kobayashi N, Kinoshita T. Glypican-3 expression is correlated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1403-1407. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 193] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 196] [Article Influence: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
70. | Yasuda E, Kumada T, Toyoda H, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A, Okuda S, Yoshimi N, Kozawa O. Evaluation for clinical utility of GPC3, measured by a commercially available ELISA kit with Glypican-3 (GPC3) antibody, as a serological and histological marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2010;40:477-485. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41] [Article Influence: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
71. | Liu H, Li P, Zhai Y, Qu CF, Zhang LJ, Tan YF, Li N, Ding HG. Diagnostic value of glypican-3 in serum and liver for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4410-4415. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 79] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89] [Article Influence: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
72. | Zhang L, Liu H, Sun L, Li N, Ding H, Zheng J. Glypican-3 as a potential differential diagnosis marker for hepatocellular carcinoma: a tissue microarray-based study. Acta Histochem. 2012;114:547-552. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
73. | Yamauchi N, Watanabe A, Hishinuma M, Ohashi K, Midorikawa Y, Morishita Y, Niki T, Shibahara J, Mori M, Makuuchi M. The glypican 3 oncofetal protein is a promising diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:1591-1598. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
74. | Baumhoer D, Tornillo L, Stadlmann S, Roncalli M, Diamantis EK, Terracciano LM. Glypican 3 expression in human nonneoplastic, preneoplastic, and neoplastic tissues: a tissue microarray analysis of 4,387 tissue samples. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:899-906. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 171] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 176] [Article Influence: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
75. | DU JL, Wei LX, Wang YL. [Expression and clinicopathologic significance of GPC3 and other antibodies in well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Zazhi. 2011;40:11-16. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
76. | Bhatia A, Kumar Y. Cancer cell micronucleus: an update on clinical and diagnostic applications. APMIS. 2013;121:569-581. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 47] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
77. | Lee YH, Oh BK, Yoo JE, Yoon SM, Choi J, Kim KS, Park YN. Chromosomal instability, telomere shortening, and inactivation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) in dysplastic nodules of hepatitis B virus-associated multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:1121-1131. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
78. | Hennedige T, Venkatesh SK. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, staging and treatment monitoring. Cancer Imaging. 2013;12:530-547. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 111] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117] [Article Influence: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
79. | Anis M, Irshad A. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: practical guide to differential diagnosis. Clin Liver Dis. 2011;15:335-52, vii-x. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
80. | Dănilă M, Sporea I, Sirli R, Popescu A, Sendroiu M, Martie A. The role of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of liver nodules in patients with cirrhosis. Med Ultrason. 2010;12:145-149. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
81. | Kim TK, Lee KH, Khalili K, Jang HJ. Hepatocellular nodules in liver cirrhosis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36:244-263. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 44] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
82. | Kim TK, Jang HJ. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of nodules in liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:3590-3596. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 54] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
83. | Martie A, Sporea I, Popescu A, Sirli R, Dănilă M, Serban C, Ardelean M, Bota S, Sendroiu M, Chisevescu D. Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Ultrason. 2011;13:108-113. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
84. | Dumitrescu CI, Gheonea IA, Săndulescu L, Surlin V, Săftoiu A, Dumitrescu D. Contrast enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Med Ultrason. 2013;15:261-267. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
85. | Ricke J, Seidensticker M, Mohnike K. Noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver: current guidelines and future prospects for radiological imaging. Liver Cancer. 2012;1:51-58. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
86. | Bota S, Piscaglia F, Marinelli S, Pecorelli A, Terzi E, Bolondi L. Comparison of international guidelines for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2012;1:190-200. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 64] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
87. | Mah WC, Lee CG. DNA methylation: potential biomarker in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Biomark Res. 2014;2:5. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
88. | Jain S, Wojdacz TK, Su YH. Challenges for the application of DNA methylation biomarkers in molecular diagnostic testing for cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013;13:283-294. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
89. | Arai E, Ushijima S, Gotoh M, Ojima H, Kosuge T, Hosoda F, Shibata T, Kondo T, Yokoi S, Imoto I. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in liver tissue at the precancerous stage and in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:2854-2862. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
90. | Ma Y, Wang X, Jin H. Methylated DNA and microRNA in body fluids as biomarkers for cancer detection. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:10307-10331. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |