Published online Sep 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12709
Revised: February 22, 2014
Accepted: April 21, 2014
Published online: September 21, 2014
Processing time: 235 Days and 19.3 Hours
In a recent review paper, Carroll and Maharshak discussed a critical role of enteric bacterial proteases in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). I take a great interest in this paper as I also suspected proteases, not from the bacteria, but those originated from the pancreas that failed to be inactivated in the lower gut due to a reduction in gut bacteria, may have played a critical role in the pathogenesis of IBD, which was first published more than a decade ago and discussed again in more detail in a recent paper published in this journal. Antibiotics may result in a big reduction in gut bacteria and bacterial proteases, but multiple studies demonstrated dramatic increased of pancreatic proteases like trypsin and chymotrypsin in the feces of animals or patients treated with antibiotics. Multiple large-scale studies also demonstrated use of antibiotics caused an increase but not decrease in the risk of developing IBD, suggesting impaired inactivation and degradation of pancreatic proteases may have played a more critical role in the pathogenesis of IBD.
Core tip: This is letter commenting on the paper by Carroll and Maharshak recently published in this journal regarding the role of enteric bacterial proteases in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here I provide some evidence suggesting that the proteases originated from the pancreas rather than gut bacteria may have played a more critical role in the development of IBD.
- Citation: Qin X. May bacterial or pancreatic proteases play a critical role in inflammatory bowel disease? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(35): 12709-12710
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i35/12709.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12709
I read with great interest the paper by Carroll and Maharshak[1] regarding the role of enteric bacterial proteases in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which succeeded another review on the similar topic[2]. I take a special interest in this paper as I also suspected proteases, not from the bacteria, but rather originated from the pancreas that failed to be inactivated in the lower gut due to a reduction in gut bacteria, may have played a critical role in the pathogenesis of IBD, which was first published more than a decade ago[3] and discussed again in more detail in a paper published in this journal in 2012[4]. It would be necessary to differentiate the proteases from these two sources, as in situations such as after treatment with antibiotics, the gut bacteria and bacterial proteases activity may be reduced as discussed in the paper by Carroll and Maharshak[1], but multiple studies demonstrated that treatment with antibiotics in animals or human results in dramatic increase of pancreatic proteases like trypsin and chymotrypsin in feces and luminal contents of the lower intestine[5-8]. At conventional condition, the activity of pancreatic digestive proteases like trypsin and chymotrypsin in the lower intestine is very low, but large amounts of these digestive proteases emerged in animals raised in germ-free condition[9-12], suggesting impaired degradation of these enzymes along with the reduction in gut bacteria. A study by Bohe et al[7] showed 100-fold increase in trypsin in fecal extracts of normal individuals treated with antibiotics. The paper by Carroll and Maharshak[1] mentioned the increased activity of proteases in stools from IBD patients, but multiple studies demonstrated increased activities of pancreatic proteases like trypsin and chymotrypsin in the feces of patients with IBD[13-15]. According to the study by Macfarlane et al[16], protease activities in human ileal effluent, while would be mainly digestive proteases originated from the pancreas, were approximately 20-fold greater than in normal faeces, which may be mainly from bacteria under conventional condition. Another study by Gibson et al[17] showed even big differences between the protease activity of the ileal effluent vs feces, being 1214 vs 20 when casein used as the substrate and 319 vs 11 when azocasein used as the substrate, respectively. Thus impaired inactivation of digestive proteases would be capable of causing a more detrimental impact on the lower gut. Multiple large-scale studies also revealed that use of antibiotics increases the risk of IBD[18-21], suggesting impaired inactivation of pancreatic proteases in the lower gut may have played a more critical role in the development of IBD.
The author of this paper thanks the sharing of the original paper by Old Mike at Crohnsforum.com:http://www.crohnsforum.com/showthread.php?p=739944#post739944 that was retrieved on Jan. 18, 2014.
P- Reviewer: Beales ILP, Garip Y S- Editor: Gou SX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Zhang DN
1. | Carroll IM, Maharshak N. Enteric bacterial proteases in inflammatory bowel disease- pathophysiology and clinical implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7531-7543. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 55] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Steck N, Mueller K, Schemann M, Haller D. Bacterial proteases in IBD and IBS. Gut. 2012;61:1610-1618. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 80] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80] [Article Influence: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Qin XF. Impaired inactivation of digestive proteases by deconjugated bilirubin: the possible mechanism for inflammatory bowel disease. Med Hypotheses. 2002;59:159-163. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Qin X. Etiology of inflammatory bowel disease: a unified hypothesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1708-1722. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 104] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91] [Article Influence: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
5. | Borgström A, Genell S, Ohlsson K. Elevated fecal levels of endogenous pancreatic endopeptidases after antibiotic treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1977;12:525-529. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Norin KE. Influence of antibiotics on some intestinal microflora associated characteristics. Anaerobe. 1997;3:145-148. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Bohe M, Borgström A, Genell S, Ohlsson K. Determination of immunoreactive trypsin, pancreatic elastase and chymotrypsin in extracts of human feces and ileostomy drainage. Digestion. 1983;27:8-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Genell S, Gustafsson BE. Impaired enteric degradation of pancreatic endopeptidases in antibiotic-treated rats. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1977;12:801-809. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Genell S, Gustafsson BE, Ohlsson K. Quantitation of active pancreatic endopeptidases in the intestinal contents of germfree and conventional rats. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1976;11:757-762. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
10. | Norin KE, Gustafsson BE, Midtvedt T. Strain differences in faecal tryptic activity of germ-free and conventional rats. Lab Anim. 1986;20:67-69. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Collinder E, Cardona ME, Kozakova H, Norin E, Stern S, Midtvedt T. Biochemical intestinal parameters in pigs reared outdoors and indoors, and in germ-free pigs. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2002;49:203-209. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Cardona ME, Kozakova H, Collinder E, Persson AK, Midtvedt T, Norin E. Biochemical intestinal parameters in germ-free minipigs and rats and in ex-germ-free minipigs and rats monoassociated with Escherichia coli. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2005;52:109-113. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | van de Merwe JP, Mol GJ. Levels of trypsin and alpha-chymotrypsin in feces from patients with Crohn’s disease. Digestion. 1982;24:1-4. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Benno P, Leijonmarck CE, Monsén U, Uribe A, Midtvedt T. Functional alterations of the microflora in patients with ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28:839-844. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Midtvedt T, Zabarovsky E, Norin E, Bark J, Gizatullin R, Kashuba V, Ljungqvist O, Zabarovska V, Möllby R, Ernberg I. Increase of faecal tryptic activity relates to changes in the intestinal microbiome: analysis of Crohn’s disease with a multidisciplinary platform. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66074. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Macfarlane GT, Allison C, Gibson SA, Cummings JH. Contribution of the microflora to proteolysis in the human large intestine. J Appl Bacteriol. 1988;64:37-46. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 149] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 148] [Article Influence: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Gibson SA, McFarlan C, Hay S, MacFarlane GT. Significance of microflora in proteolysis in the colon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55:679-683. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
18. | Virta L, Auvinen A, Helenius H, Huovinen P, Kolho KL. Association of repeated exposure to antibiotics with the development of pediatric Crohn’s disease--a nationwide, register-based finnish case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:775-784. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 118] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 127] [Article Influence: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Hviid A, Svanström H, Frisch M. Antibiotic use and inflammatory bowel diseases in childhood. Gut. 2011;60:49-54. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 348] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 342] [Article Influence: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Kronman MP, Zaoutis TE, Haynes K, Feng R, Coffin SE. Antibiotic exposure and IBD development among children: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e794-e803. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 279] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 275] [Article Influence: 22.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Shaw SY, Blanchard JF, Bernstein CN. Association between the use of antibiotics and new diagnoses of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:2133-2142. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 159] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 166] [Article Influence: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |