Topic Highlight Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2013; 19(44): 7846-7851
Published online Nov 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.7846
Hepatitis C virus control among persons who inject drugs requires overcoming barriers to care
Marija Zeremski, Andrew H Talal, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States
Jon E Zibbell, Bryce D Smith, Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, United States
Anthony D Martinez, Andrew H Talal, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States
Steven Kritz, Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation, Brooklyn, NY 11201, United States
Author contributions: Zeremski M, Martinez AD, Smith BD and Talal AH contributed to the concept of the article; Zeremski M, Zibbell JE, Martinez AD, Kritz S, Smith BD and Talal AH contributed to the writing; all authors approved the final version.
Correspondence to: Andrew H Talal, MD, MPH, Professor, Chief, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, State University of New York at Buffalo, UB/CTRC, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 6090, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States. ahtalal@buffalo.edu
Telephone: +1-716-8884738 Fax: +1-716-8541397
Received: July 17, 2013
Revised: October 18, 2013
Accepted: November 2, 2013
Published online: November 28, 2013
Processing time: 147 Days and 9.2 Hours

Abstract

Despite a high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the vast majority of persons who inject drugs (PWID) have not engaged in HCV care due to a large number of obstacles. Education about the infection among both PWID and providers remains an important challenge as does discrimination faced by PWID in conventional health care settings. Many providers also remain hesitant to prescribe antiviral therapy due to concerns about adherence and relapse to drug use resulting in reinfection. Presently, however, as a result of improvements in treatment efficacy combined with professional society and government endorsement of HCV treatment for PWID, a pressing need exists to develop strategies to engage these individuals into HCV care. In this article, we propose several strategies that can be pursued in an attempt to engage PWID into HCV management. We advocate that multidisciplinary approaches that utilize health care practitioners from a wide range of specialties, as well as co-localization of medical services, are strategies likely to result in increased numbers of PWID entering into HCV management. Pursuit of HCV therapy after stabilization through drug treatment is an additional strategy likely to increase PWID engagement into HCV care. The full impact of direct acting antivirals for HCV will only be realized if innovative approaches are pursued to engage all HCV infected individuals into treatment.

Key Words: Treatment of hepatitis C; Viral infection; Human immunodeficiency virus; Hepatitis C virus coinfection; Persons who inject drugs; Obstacles to treatment

Core tip: Despite persons who inject drugs (PWIDs) representing the majority of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease burden, few receive treatment for HCV. Barriers to treatment uptake exist at multiple levels. Co-localization of HCV management with substance abuse facilities may result in greater treatment uptake for PWID.



INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of chronic liver disease affecting more than 120 million people worldwide[1,2] and at least 3.2 million in the United States[3-5]. Among HCV-exposed individuals, up to 80% will develop chronic infection that can ultimately lead to hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and death[6]. The prevalence of cirrhosis is estimated to increase from 25% in 2010 to 45% by 2030 in untreated patients with chronic HCV infection, and liver-related deaths are projected to increase by 175% over the next decade[7]. Currently, HCV is the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States[8].

As the virus is most effectively transmitted via blood, injection drug use is currently the primary route of HCV transmission in the United States and other developed countries. Among persons who inject drugs (PWID), estimated HCV prevalence ranges from 30% to 70%, depending on frequency and duration of use, while incidence ranges from 16% to 42% per year[9,10]. Additionally, up to 20% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected PWID in the United States are co-infected with HCV[11]. A recent study predicted that for a PWID population with 20% baseline chronic HCV prevalence, treatment rates of 5, 10, 20 or 40 per 1000 annually can lead to a 15%, 30%, 62% and 72% reduction in prevalence after 10 years, respectively[12]. The same authors have also estimated that novel treatments, expected to result in viral clearance rates of 90%, can halve HCV prevalence of 25%, 50%, and 65% within 15 years with treatment rates of 15, 40, or 76 per 1000 PWIDs annually[13]. Therefore, addressing HCV infection among PWID is a crucial step toward its successful control and prevention.

Despite the fact that PWID represent the majority of the HCV disease burden in developed countries, only 21%-65% have been evaluated for HCV, with less than 20% of evaluated patients receiving treatment[14-16]. Moreover, while the majority (> 70%) of PWID initially express willingness to undergo HCV treatment, only a minor percentage (1%-6%) actually receives therapy[14,16,17]. A variety of factors limit enrollment of PWID into HCV care and treatment. Identification of these barriers is therefore a key step toward formulating interventions to increase access to HCV care for PWID. Our goal in this article is to highlight the obstacles to providing HCV care to PWID and to propose interventions by which these barriers can be overcome.

BARRIERS TO HCV TREATMENT IN PWID

Obstacles to providing HCV care to PWID emanate from patients, health care providers and the health care system[18] (Table 1). One of the most important patient level obstacles to receiving care is lack of HCV-related knowledge resulting in a low perceived need for treatment. Between 65%-75% of HCV-infected patients are unaware of their status[19]. While many patients are aware that treatment for HCV exists, few are cognizant that it is curative. Some PWID are reluctant to undergo liver biopsy, an invasive procedure that has been frequently required prior initiation of HCV treatment. The presence of needles that are required for interferon injection might also be an obstacle to treatment in some persons who previously injected drugs. Additionally, many PWID perceive treatment-related side effects to be worse than the virus itself. Finally, mistrust of the health care system and difficulty keeping medical appointments may also contribute to PWID’s unwillingness to initiate HCV therapy[14]. PWID are also more likely to be uninsured, have limited access to health care services, be affected by poverty, and have reduced social support[20].

Table 1 Most common barriers to engagement of persons who inject drugs into care for hepatitis C virus infection.
DomainSpecific barrier
Patient-levelLow perceived treatment need
Fear of side effects
Lack of knowledge of serostatus
Fear of liver biopsy
Needles may promote relapse
Coexisting mental health diagnosis
Lack of insurance, poverty, low socioeconomic status
Physician-levelConcerns about reinfection
Biases against PWID
Adherence concerns
Dual diagnoses
Health system-levelNavigation can be complex
Mistrust between PWID and medical community
High cost of HCV treatment
Stigmatization in health care venues

Provider barriers also contribute to low rates of treatment provision to PWID. Patients who report injecting drugs are less likely to be referred for HCV evaluation and less likely to receive HCV treatment[21,22]. Many health care providers remain hesitant to treat patients with a history of drug use due to concerns about adherence to the therapeutic regimen. Some providers avoid treatment of PWID due to the misconception that reinfection occurs at a high level following relapse to injection drug use[23]. Finally, people with drug addiction have been perceived as challenging patients because they are more likely to be dually diagnosed with psychiatric co-morbidities, such as depression and anxiety, compared to non-addicted individuals[24].

The health care system itself may pose numerous obstacles to HCV treatment of PWID. The United States health care system is complex and the referral and scheduling process, as well as insurance and payment issues, can be difficult to navigate. Long-seated, distrusting relations between PWID and the medical community have contributed to feelings of stigmatization among those seeking HCV treatment. PWID often experience health care providers as judgmental, unresponsive to their medical needs, and disdainful, all of which serve as systemic barriers to care.

Finally, high cost of HCV therapy is another treatment barrier. For example, the estimated total cost of telaprevir-based therapy, including the cost of side effect management, can be as high as $147000[25]. Although this problem is not specific to PWID, it certainly affects them to a greater extent compared to general population, particularly as PWID are more likely to be uninsured and to have less financial resources.

Excluding PWID from HCV treatment contradicts current recommendations issued by several United States governmental and relevant professional organizations. Governmental bodies, including the Institute of Medicine (IOM)[26] and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[27], now advocate for increased awareness and resources to address the issue of disparities in HCV treatment for PWID. Professional organizations such as the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD)[28], have stated in their guidelines that PWID should be treated for HCV. Yet despite these recommendations, PWID are frequently excluded from therapy by the health care system.

OVERCOMING THE OBSTACLES TO HCV TREATMENT FOR PWID

Through advances in HCV management, we are now experiencing partial resolution of the obstacles to HCV treatment among PWID. The rapid acceleration of HCV treatment toward an all oral regimen with improved efficacy and fewer adverse effects will likely result in the elimination of the liver biopsy as a requirement to initiate treatment. Additionally, the avoidance of needle exposure associated with interferon injection would eliminate anxiety among persons who no longer inject drugs. The onus now moves toward strategy development to address other obstacles in the management of HCV in PWID.

As patient-related obstacles can derive from misconceptions and lack of HCV-related knowledge, appropriately designed educational interventions could prove beneficial in promoting HCV care and treatment. Unfortunately, while nationwide surveys in the United States have documented that most opioid agonist treatment (OAT) facilities provide at least some form of HCV education[29,30], patients infrequently avail themselves of these opportunities[31]. Increased awareness of potential benefits of such programs and the addition of patient incentives, such as financial compensation or travel stipends, might increase participation. Peer support groups, directed by treatment-experienced patients, could encourage treatment acceptance and provide emotional support through shared treatment experiences. Support from mental health and allied health professionals to assist with procurement of social and mental health services, temporary disability, accessing Medicaid, and obtaining transportation, may potentially increase involvement in HCV treatment. These interventions can be incorporated into an individualized treatment plan to maximize adherence rates and successful outcome achievement.

Other obstacles to provision of HCV care and treatment result from lack of HCV-related knowledge and misconceptions among health professionals regarding PWID. These barriers may be overcome by provider education about PWID or by close collaboration between health care providers from diverse specialties[32]. Involvement of a multidisciplinary team consisting of representatives of hepatology, addiction medicine, generalists, and mental health experts in the treatment of HCV for PWID has been shown to result in increased treatment efficacy[32]. Besides direct interaction for the purposes of patient care, mentoring programs conducted between HCV specialists, substance abuse treatment staff, and peers could increase knowledge and build the skills necessary to treat this population. Mentoring programs could be conducted in person or via telemedicine.

A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that HCV treatment outcomes among PWID were improved among those treated for opioid addiction compared to untreated individuals[32]. In addition, rates of successful treatment outcomes for PWID were shown to be almost identical to outcomes achieved in registration trials[32,33]. However, while occasional drug use does not impact on adherence, treatment completion or treatment efficacy, frequent drug use (daily or every other day) does[34]. Consequently, successful outcomes for HCV are more likely to be achieved if PWID who inject frequently are initially stabilized for their addiction and subsequently undergo HCV therapy.

By co-localizing both HCV preventive and treatment services at venues where PWID receive care for drug addiction, uptake of HCV services might increase. For example, due to annual HCV serologic testing in some OAT facilities, HCV-infected patients have been more readily identifiable. At present, however, offsite referral to HCV specialty-care clinics is a common practice among drug treatment providers[29,35]. However, its effectiveness is limited as the majority of referred patients often fail to schedule or appear at appointments[14,36,37]. Yet, OAT facilities that do offer on-site HCV evaluation and treatment have achieved improved outcomes[38-41]. Similar findings have been previously reported for HIV-infected PWID, many of whom voluntarily use primary care services if they are offered onsite in OAT facilities[42]. Unfortunately, a recent study of substance abuse treatment programs affiliated with academic medical centers conducted through the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network found a significant lack of comprehensive HCV counseling, testing, and treatment both on-site or by referral[43]. The same programs, however, offered significantly more HIV/AIDS-related health services[44].

OAT facilities that do offer integrated HCV care programs may also provide comprehensive on-site primary care services administered by health care providers with training in diverse disciplines including infectious diseases, hepatology, addiction medicine, and mental health[45-47]. Many of these programs also offer active case management and have diverse staff consisting of physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, nurses, counselors, and social workers. To improve adherence, some programs utilize directly observed therapy as well as offering counseling sessions, motivational interviewing, peer-based support groups, and HCV-related education[45,47-50]. Improvement over offsite referral has also been achieved through an integrated model combining addiction medicine physicians with hepatologists in a viral hepatitis clinic[51].

Finally, overcoming the financial obstacles for HCV treatment will not be easy, especially in developing countries. In the United States, health care reform will promote integration of specialty services into primary care, promote prevention, and will likely provide an opportunity for development of innovative models for previously medically-marginalized populations such as PWID. In contrast, in developing countries, pharmacy assistance programs will most likely be necessary in order to enable patients to access novel HCV treatments.

PARALLELS BETWEEN HIV AND HCV

The issue of increasing awareness and funding for HCV treatment among PWID has many similarities to HIV; indeed, HIV treatment is often touted as one of the great medical successes of our time. As the gravity of the emerging HIV epidemic became apparent in the 1980s, national attention and subsequent funds were directed toward combating the infection. Although similarities exist between both viral infections, so do important differences. For example, HCV is curable in a majority of cases while HIV presently requires costly lifelong treatment. Prevention activities among PWID that have been highly effective in controlling HIV have not been as effective in the control of HCV, largely due to limited funding and advocacy[52]. Additionally, the ultimate consequences of HCV infection, such as development of end-stage liver disease, hepatic decompensation, or hepatocellular carcinoma leading to liver transplant and subsequent lifelong immunosuppression, are largely preventable through screening and subsequent treatment. With implementation of improved therapies, the HCV field hopes to achieve the same levels of success accomplished by the HIV field.

CONCLUSION

As many HCV-infected PWID acquired the virus decades ago, they suffer from cirrhosis and other complications of end-stage liver disease with increasing prevalence. Therefore, strategies to increase HCV care and treatment among PWID are critically needed. Achieving higher treatment rates among this population will require overcoming existing barriers at the patient, provider, and institutional levels. Co-localization of HCV management with substance abuse treatment may be a strategy that could facilitate HCV diagnosis as well as promote treatment acceptance and adherence. This approach would reduce the prevalence of end-stage liver disease, viral transmission, and HCV-associated mortality. Additionally, early identification and treatment of HCV infection is more cost-effective compared to management of end-stage liver disease[53]. Tremendous advances are presently occurring in the HCV field, and we hope that PWID will be included in these changes.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers: Abbas Z, Mihaila RG, Phunchai C S- Editor: Wen LL L- Editor: A E- Editor: Zhang DN

References
1.  World Health Organization. Hepatitis C. Fact Sheet No. 164.  Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs164/en/. Accessed October 12, 2011.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:558-567.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1927]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1904]  [Article Influence: 100.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, McQuillan GM, Kuhnert WL, Alter MJ. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:705-714.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Chak E, Talal AH, Sherman KE, Schiff ER, Saab S. Hepatitis C virus infection in USA: an estimate of true prevalence. Liver Int. 2011;31:1090-1101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 309]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 320]  [Article Influence: 24.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Davis GL, Keeffe EB, Balart LA. Advances in Liver Disease: Highlights from the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2006;6:48-61.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Afdhal NH. The natural history of hepatitis C. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24 Suppl 2:3-8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Davis GL, Alter MJ, El-Serag H, Poynard T, Jennings LW. Aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons in the United States: a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:513-21, 521.e1-6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 671]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 652]  [Article Influence: 46.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Brown RS. Hepatitis C and liver transplantation. Nature. 2005;436:973-978.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 269]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 277]  [Article Influence: 14.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Amon JJ, Garfein RS, Ahdieh-Grant L, Armstrong GL, Ouellet LJ, Latka MH, Vlahov D, Strathdee SA, Hudson SM, Kerndt P. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users in the United States, 1994-2004. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1852-1858.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 128]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 136]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Edlin BR, Carden MR. Injection drug users: the overlooked core of the hepatitis C epidemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:673-676.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Aceijas C, Rhodes T. Global estimates of prevalence of HCV infection among injecting drug users. Int J Drug Policy. 2007;18:352-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 237]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 239]  [Article Influence: 14.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Martin NK, Vickerman P, Foster GR, Hutchinson SJ, Goldberg DJ, Hickman M. Can antiviral therapy for hepatitis C reduce the prevalence of HCV among injecting drug user populations? A modeling analysis of its prevention utility. J Hepatol. 2011;54:1137-1144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 180]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 180]  [Article Influence: 13.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Martin NK, Vickerman P, Grebely J, Hellard M, Hutchinson SJ, Lima VD, Foster GR, Dillon JF, Goldberg DJ, Dore GJ. Hepatitis C virus treatment for prevention among people who inject drugs: Modeling treatment scale-up in the age of direct-acting antivirals. Hepatology. 2013;Epub ahead of print.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 400]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 394]  [Article Influence: 35.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Mehta SH, Genberg BL, Astemborski J, Kavasery R, Kirk GD, Vlahov D, Strathdee SA, Thomas DL. Limited uptake of hepatitis C treatment among injection drug users. J Community Health. 2008;33:126-133.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 253]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 278]  [Article Influence: 17.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Schackman BR, Teixeira PA, Beeder AB. Offers of hepatitis C care do not lead to treatment. J Urban Health. 2007;84:455-458.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Grebely J, Genoway KA, Raffa JD, Dhadwal G, Rajan T, Showler G, Kalousek K, Duncan F, Tyndall MW, Fraser C. Barriers associated with the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection among illicit drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;93:141-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 156]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 164]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Grebely J, Raffa JD, Lai C, Krajden M, Kerr T, Fischer B, Tyndall MW. Low uptake of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection in a large community-based study of inner city residents. J Viral Hepat. 2009;16:352-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 135]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 150]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Morrill JA, Shrestha M, Grant RW. Barriers to the treatment of hepatitis C. Patient, provider, and system factors. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:754-758.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 139]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 154]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Mitchell AE, Colvin HM, Palmer Beasley R. Institute of Medicine recommendations for the prevention and control of hepatitis B and C. Hepatology. 2010;51:729-733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 138]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 166]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 2000;284:1689-1695.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Mehta SH, Lucas GM, Mirel LB, Torbenson M, Higgins Y, Moore RD, Thomas DL, Sulkowski MS. Limited effectiveness of antiviral treatment for hepatitis C in an urban HIV clinic. AIDS. 2006;20:2361-2369.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 105]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 115]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Stoové MA, Gifford SM, Dore GJ. The impact of injecting drug use status on hepatitis C-related referral and treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77:81-86.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 74]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Grady BP, Schinkel J, Thomas XV, Dalgard O. Hepatitis C virus reinfection following treatment among people who use drugs. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57 Suppl 2:S105-S110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Scheft H, Fontenette DC. Psychiatric barriers to readiness for treatment for hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection among injection drug users: clinical experience of an addiction psychiatrist in the HIV-HCV coinfection clinic of a public health hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40 Suppl 5:S292-S296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Bichoupan K, Martel-Laferriere V, Ng M, Schonfeld A, Pappas A, Crismale J, Stivala A, Khaitova V, Gardenier D, Perumalswami P. Real World Costs of Telaprevir-Based Triple Therapy, Including Costs of Managing Adverse Events, at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY: $147,000 Per EOT. J Hepatol. 2013;58:S324-S325.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Institute of Medicine. Hepatitis and Liver Cancer: A National Strategy for Prevention and Control of Hepatitis B and C.  Available from: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/Hepatitis-and-Liver-Cancer-A-National-Strategy-for-Prevention-and-Control-of-Hepatitis-B-and-C. Accessed October 27, 2011.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.   Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ash/initiatives/hepatitis. Accessed October 12, 2011.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:1335-1374.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2252]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2206]  [Article Influence: 147.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
29.  Strauss SM, Falkin GP, Vassilev Z, Des Jarlais DC, Astone J. A nationwide survey of hepatitis C services provided by drug treatment programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;22:55-62.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Vassilev ZP, Strauss SM, Astone JM, Friedmann PD, Des Jarlais DC. Provision of on-site medical care to patients with hepatitis C in drug treatment units. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004;15:663-671.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Strauss SM, Astone-Twerell J, Munoz-Plaza CE, Des Jarlais DC, Gwadz M, Hagan H, Osborne A, Rosenblum A. Drug treatment program patients’ hepatitis C virus (HCV) education needs and their use of available HCV education services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Dimova RB, Zeremski M, Jacobson IM, Hagan H, Des Jarlais DC, Talal AH. Determinants of hepatitis C virus treatment completion and efficacy in drug users assessed by meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:806-816.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 111]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Aspinall EJ, Corson S, Doyle JS, Grebely J, Hutchinson SJ, Dore GJ, Goldberg DJ, Hellard ME. Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection among people who are actively injecting drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57 Suppl 2:S80-S89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 246]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 251]  [Article Influence: 25.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Robaeys G, Grebely J, Mauss S, Bruggmann P, Moussalli J, De Gottardi A, Swan T, Arain A, Kautz A, Stöver H. Recommendations for the management of hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57 Suppl 2:S129-S137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 94]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Litwin AH, Kunins HV, Berg KM, Federman AD, Heavner KK, Gourevitch MN, Arnsten JH. Hepatitis C management by addiction medicine physicians: results from a national survey. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;33:99-105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Fishbein DA, Lo Y, Reinus JF, Gourevitch MN, Klein RS. Factors associated with successful referral for clinical care of drug users with chronic hepatitis C who have or are at risk for HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37:1367-1375.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Hallinan R, Byrne A, Agho K, Dore GJ. Referral for chronic hepatitis C treatment from a drug dependency treatment setting. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;88:49-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Friedmann PD, D’Aunno TA, Jin L, Alexander JA. Medical and psychosocial services in drug abuse treatment: do stronger linkages promote client utilization? Health Serv Res. 2000;35:443-465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Umbricht-Schneiter A, Ginn DH, Pabst KM, Bigelow GE. Providing medical care to methadone clinic patients: referral vs on-site care. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:207-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Moussalli J, Delaquaize H, Boubilley D, Lhomme JP, Merleau Ponty J, Sabot D, Kerever A, Valleur M, Poynard T. Factors to improve the management of hepatitis C in drug users: an observational study in an addiction centre. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2010;2010.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Evon DM, Simpson K, Kixmiller S, Galanko J, Dougherty K, Golin C, Fried MW. A randomized controlled trial of an integrated care intervention to increase eligibility for chronic hepatitis C treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1777-1786.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Selwyn PA, Budner NS, Wasserman WC, Arno PS. Utilization of on-site primary care services by HIV-seropositive and seronegative drug users in a methadone maintenance program. Public Health Rep. 1993;108:492-500.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Bini EJ, Kritz S, Brown LS, Robinson J, Calsyn D, Alderson D, Tracy K, McAuliffe P, Smith C, Rotrosen J. Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus services offered by substance abuse treatment programs in the United States. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012;42:438-445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Brown LS, Kritz S, Goldsmith RJ, Bini EJ, Robinson J, Alderson D, Rotrosen J. Health services for HIV/AIDS, HCV, and sexually transmitted infections in substance abuse treatment programs. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:441-451.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Litwin AH, Soloway I, Gourevitch MN. Integrating services for injection drug users infected with hepatitis C virus with methadone maintenance treatment: challenges and opportunities. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40 Suppl 5:S339-S345.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Litwin AH, Harris KA, Nahvi S, Zamor PJ, Soloway IJ, Tenore PL, Kaswan D, Gourevitch MN, Arnsten JH. Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin in a methadone maintenance treatment program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;37:32-40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 86]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 83]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Krook AL, Stokka D, Heger B, Nygaard E. Hepatitis C treatment of opioid dependants receiving maintenance treatment: results of a Norwegian pilot study. Eur Addict Res. 2007;13:216-221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Fried R, Monnat M, Seidenberg A, Oppliger R, Schmid P, Herold M, Isler M, Broers B, Kölliker C, Schönbucher P. Swiss multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, feasibility and safety of peginterferon-alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C in official opiate substitution programs. Digestion. 2008;78:123-130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Bonkovsky HL, Tice AD, Yapp RG, Bodenheimer HC, Monto A, Rossi SJ, Sulkowski MS. Efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin in methadone maintenance patients: randomized comparison of direct observed therapy and self-administration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2757-2765.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Sylvestre DL, Zweben JE. Integrating HCV services for drug users: a model to improve engagement and outcomes. Int J Drug Policy. 2007;18:406-410.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 79]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Martinez AD, Dimova R, Marks KM, Beeder AB, Zeremski M, Kreek MJ, Talal AH. Integrated internist - addiction medicine - hepatology model for hepatitis C management for individuals on methadone maintenance. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19:47-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Mehta SH, Astemborski J, Kirk GD, Strathdee SA, Nelson KE, Vlahov D, Thomas DL. Changes in blood-borne infection risk among injection drug users. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:587-594.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 95]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  McEwan P, Ward T, Yuan Y, Kim R, L’italien G. The impact of timing and prioritization on the cost-effectiveness of birth cohort testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus in the United States. Hepatology. 2013;58:54-64.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]