Brief Article Open Access
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2012; 18(17): 2112-2120
Published online May 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2112
Association of NOD1 and NOD2 genes polymorphisms with Helicobacter pylori related gastric cancer in a Chinese population
Peng Wang, Li Zhang, Hao-Xia Tao, Sheng-Ling Yuan, Yan-Chun Wang, Ling-Chun Wang, Zhao-Shan Zhang, Chun-Jie Liu, State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing 100071, China
Jian-Ming Jiang, Dan Ma, Hao Liang, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, China People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
Author contributions: Wang P and Zhang L contributed equally to this work; Wang P, Zhang L, Liang H and Liu CJ designed the research; Wang P, Zhang L, Jiang JM, Ma D, Tao HX, Yuan SL, Wang YC and Wang LC performed the research; Wang P and Zhang L analyzed the data; Wang P, Zhang ZS and Liu CJ wrote the paper.
Supported by The Major Foundation of Vaccines and Antibody Program during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan Period (863 Program), No. 2006AA02A219; the National Specialized Research Fund for Control of Major Infectious Diseases during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan Period, No. 2008ZX10004-015; the National Major Science and Technology Project of China (Innovation and Development of New Drugs), No. 2009ZX09301-002
Correspondence to: Dr. Chun-Jie Liu, State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, 20 Feng Tai Dong Da Jie Street, Beijing 100071, China. liucj@nic.bmi.ac.cn
Telephone: +86-10-66948834 Fax: +86-10-63833521
Received: May 11, 2011
Revised: December 6, 2011
Accepted: March 10, 2012
Published online: May 7, 2012

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the association between the tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (TagSNPs) of NOD1 and NOD2 and the risk of developing gastric cancer.

METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study including 296 incident gastric cancer patients and 160 gastritis controls. Eight TagSNPs in the NOD1 and NOD2 genes were selected from the Hapmap database using the haploview software and genotyped by the Sequenom MassArray system. The serum levels of anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) IgG were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to indicate H. pylori infection. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression, including sex and age as confounding factors.

RESULTS: The NOD1 rs2907749 GG genotype showed a decreased risk for gastric cancer (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.95, P = 0.04) while the rs7789045 TT genotype showed an increased risk (OR 2.14, 95% CI: 1.20-3.82, P = 0.01). An elevated susceptibility to gastric cancer was observed in the subjects with H. pylori infection and the NaOD1 rs7789045 TT genotype (OR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.07-3.94, P = 0.03) or the NOD2 rs7205423 GC genotype (OR 2.52, 95% CI: 1.05-6.04, P = 0.04). Haplotype analysis suggested that the distribution of AGT (rs2907749, rs2075820 and rs7789045) in NOD1 between the cases and control groups was significantly different (P corrected: 0.04), and the diplotype AGT/AGT was associated with an elevated gastric cancer risk (OR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.04-3.79, P = 0.04). The association of the NOD1 rs7789045 TT genotype and the diplotype AGT/AGT was significant with H. pylori-related diffuse-type gastric cancer (OR 3.00, 95% CI: 1.38-6.53, P = 0.01; OR 4.02, 95% CI: 1.61-10.05, P < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Genetic polymorphisms in NOD1 and NOD2 may interact with H. pylori infection and may play important roles in promoting the development of gastric cancer in the Chinese population.

Key Words: Gastric cancer; NOD1; NOD2; Gene polymorphisms; Helicobacter pylori infection



INTRODUCTION

The average prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in people worldwide is approximately 50%. An epidemiology meta analysis has indicated that the H. pylori prevalence ranges from 35% to 81% in different districts within China, and the average infection rate is 58%[1]. H. pylori was estimated to be responsible for approximately 65% of all stomach cancers worldwide[2]. It has been reported that gastric cancer-associated mortality rates accounted for nearly one-quarter of the total malignant tumor-related mortalities in China[3]. Together with H. pylori infection, host genetic susceptibility, diet, a high salt intake and smoking have all been proposed to be risk factors for gastric cancer.

Clinical and epidemiologic studies have suggested a strong association between chronic infection, inflammation, and cancer[4-6]. Gastric cancer develops very rarely in the normal gastric mucosa. Most of the H. pylori-infected individuals showed gastritis, but very few people develop gastric cancer. The genetic variations between the gastritis and gastric cancer patients may play important roles in the H. pylori-related clinical outcomes[7]. The host immune response has a strong role in determining the outcome of H. pylori infection, and the polymorphisms in genes that control this immune response have been shown to affect the risk of gastric cancer[8-11]. H. pylori trigger inflammation through activation of the receptors that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and these PAMPs are recognized through a set of germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). The activation of PRRs leads to rapid production of a range of pro-inflammatory cytokines with a profound impact on both the innate and adaptive immune responses.

Among the cytosolic PRRs is the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor family. Two members of this family, known as NOD1 and NOD2, have been recently identified[12]. NOD1 and NOD2 are characterized by a central NOD, an N-terminal effector-binding domain (CARD) and a C-terminal ligand recognition domain that is comprised of leucine-rich repeats (LRR)[13]. NOD1 senses a muropeptide found mostly in Gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycans, whereas NOD2 senses bacterial molecules produced during peptidoglycan synthesis or degradation[14]. NOD1 and NOD2 are becoming known as key regulators of chronic inflammatory conditions[15]. The NODs ultimately activate transcription factors such as nuclear factor (NF)-κB, STAT1 and so on, which play important roles in inflammation-linked tumor development. It is important to understand how the NOD family proteins work together in coordinating the host response to a given pathogen. Direct evidence for NOD family-mediated host defense derived mostly from an in vivo study in which NOD1-deficient mice were reported to be more susceptible to infection by H. pylori strains with functional type IV secretion systems[16]. Additionally, NOD2 was reported to regulate antimicrobial peptide synthesis as part of the host defense strategies against L. monocytogenes infection in vivo[17].

There are several reports that demonstrated that the polymorphisms of the NOD1 and NOD2 genes in different populations were related to variant clinical outcomes of H. pylori infection. Although two studies have shown that the NOD1 E266K (rs2075820) mutation increased the risk of peptic ulceration, antral atrophy and intestinal metaplasia[18,19], there is little research related to the association between NOD1 polymorphisms and gastric cancer. NOD2 polymorphisms have been proven to significantly correlate with the incidence of gastric cancer in European populations[20-22], whereas all of the SNPs studied proved to be monomorphic sites in the Chinese population. To verify that the polymorphisms of the H. pylori-recognized NOD1 and NOD2 contribute to gastric cancer carcinogenesis through gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, we performed a hospital-based case-control study with 296 incident gastric cancer patients (hospital case subjects) and 160 gastritis patients (hospital control subjects).

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population

The hospital-based case-control study consisted of 466 hospitalized patients recruited sequentially in the China People’s Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2009 to June 2010. The 296 case subjects were histopathologically verified gastric cancer patients (GC group) and the 160 control subjects were gastritis patients (GA group) who had undergone gastroscopy. All subjects were unrelated Han Chinese. The exclusion criteria for the hospital control subjects included previous cancer and previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Upon recruitment, informed consent was obtained from each subject or their relatives, and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Biotechnology.

Genotyping and tag single nucleotide polymorphisms selection

Eight TagSNPs for the NOD1 and NOD2 genes were chosen from the designable set of common SNPs [minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 0.05] genotyped in the Han Chinese (CHB) population samples of the HapMap Project (Data Release 24/Phase II, NCBI B36 assembly, dbSNP b126). The TagSNPs selection was done using the software Haploview version 4.0 with pairwise tagging mode. For the NOD1 gene, four TagSNPs were selected (rs17159048, rs2907749, rs2075820 and rs7789045), which captured 36 out of 45 (80%) of the SNPs covering the whole gene. For the NOD2 gene, four TagSNPs were selected (rs2067085, rs1861759, rs3135500 and rs72054230), which captured 17 out of 21 (80%) of the SNPs covering the whole gene, and the 3’-flanking 2 kb regions; TagSNPs were selected with pairwise r2≥ 0.80.

The genotypes of all the SNPs were determined by the MassArray system (Sequenom iPLEXassay, San Diego, United States). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers (MassExtend; Sequenom) used in this study were listed in Table 1. Briefly, approximately 15 ng of genomic DNAs isolated from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of the study subjects were used to genotype each sample. Locus-specific PCR and detection primers were designed using the MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 software (Sequenom, San Diego, United States). The sample DNA was amplified by a multiplex PCR reaction, and the PCR products were then used for locus-specific single-base extension reaction. The resulting products were desalted and transferred to a 384-element SpectroCHIP array. The alleles were discriminated by mass spectrometry. (Sequenom, San Diego, United States). Genotyping was performed without knowledge of the case or control status. Twenty random samples were tested in duplicate by different persons, and the reproducibility was 100%.

Table 1 Primer details for genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms from NOD1 and NOD2 genes.
SNP IDPCR 1st primerPCR 2nd primerAmplication length (bp)Extension sequence primer
rs17159048ACGTTGGATGTCAAGAGGAGGGTATTAGGCACGTTGGATGCTGTGTGCTTGGGCAGTAAC93TTTGGCAGTAACAGTGACAAG
rs2907749ACGTTGGATGGCTGTGAAGAACAGCAAATCACGTTGGATGCACACAGCAGGTTGTACCAC99GTAGGTTGTACCACATACATCC
rs2075820ACGTTGGATGAAGCGCAGCAGGAAGGCAAAACGTTGGATGACCTGCTCTTCAAGCACTAC90CACTCCTGCTACCCAGAGCGGGACCCC
rs7789045ACGTTGGATGAGCAGACACAGACAGGGTTCACGTTGGATGTTGAGATTGCTGACTGGTGG95GTGGTCTCTTCCAGC
rs2067085ACGTTGGATGATCAGGTTGCCGATCTTCACACGTTGGATGCCTTTCCTGAGAACTCTGTG95GTGCCTCACCCTCTG
rs1861759ACGTTGGATGTGACATTTCTCTTGGCTTCCACGTTGGATGTGATGTGAAGGAATTCCAGG100AAGACACGACACCTTTGGC
rs3135500ACGTTGGATGGGCCATGTTGTCTATAAGAGACGTTGGATGGATGTGTGAAAACTGGTTAA99ATTTGTGAAAACTGGTTAATATTTATAG
rs7205423ACGTTGGATGCTTGGCTCCAGCCCATTTTGACGTTGGATGTATGGCTGCTGCAGGAAATG99CACAAATTATCCCCTTATAGTC
Helicobacter pylori detection

The H. pylori infection status was evaluated by the detection of serum-specific IgG antibodies against H. pylori in duplicate with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay procedures. The sonicated H. pylori strain SS1 antigen was used to coat 96-well microplates at a concentration of 2 μg/mL. The sera of the samples were diluted 1:100 when measured. Twenty serum samples, which were verified by H. pylori histology culture, rapid urease test and Carbon-14-Urea Breath Test, were considered the candidate positive controls, whereas twenty serum samples were considered candidate negative controls by the same three tests. Six serum samples were ultimately confirmed as the negative control criteria, the mean absorbance of which was identical to that of the 20 candidate negative controls. Finally, the samples with a mean absorbance 2.1-fold or greater than the mean absorbance of the six negative reference samples were considered to be positive reactions. The sensitivity of the H. pylori detection system was 100% (20 of 20) in the control groups.

Haplotype construction and statistical analysis

The Pearson’s χ2 test was used to examine the differences between the case and the control groups in sex, H. pylori infection and age groups. The genotype frequencies in the cases and controls were compared and both the OR and 95% CI: of each genotype were estimated by applying unconditional logistic regression adjusting for age, sex and H. pylori infection when it was appropriate. The homozygotes of the most frequent allele in controls were used as the reference group. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was performed using PLINK version1.07[23]. The haplotypes were inferred using Haploview 4.0[24]. The pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) among the SNPs was assessed using Haploview 4.0. The case-control comparisons of the haplotype distributions were carried out by applying the inbuilt permutation test based on 10 000 permutations. SPSS, version 15.0 (Chicago, IL, United States) was used for all the statistical analyses.

RESULTS
Characteristics of the study population

A total of 296 incident patients with gastric cancer and 160 incident patients with gastritis were enrolled in this case-control study. Table 2 shows that the distributions of sex between the two groups were not significantly different. The age groups distribution between the gastric cancer patients and gastritis controls was also similar. The percentage of patients having H. pylori infection was almost the same in both the cases and controls. Among the gastric cancer cases, 129 (44%) were intestinal-type cancer, 125 (42%) were diffuse-type cancer, and 42 (14%) were unknown histology-type cases.

Table 2 Baseline clinical characteristics of cases and controls n (%).
GC group (n = 296)GA group (n = 160)P1
Sex0.455
Male222 (75.0)125 (78.1)
Female74 (25.0)35 (21.9)
Helicobacter pylori infection0.946
Positive221 (74.7)119 (74.4)
Negative75 (25.3)41 (25.6)
Age (yr)0.193
≤ 55131 (43.9)81 (50.6)
> 55165 (56.1)79 (49.4)
Histological type
Intestinal129 (43.6)
Diffuse125 (42.2)
Unknown42 (14.2)
Genetic association of the polymorphisms in NOD1 and NOD2 with gastric cancer

The distribution of each of the eight SNPs genotyped in the gastric cancer and gastritis group fitted the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium law except for NOD1 rs7789045. For rs7789045, this Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium option is available for the gastritis subjects (χ2 = 0.735, P = 0.391) but not for the gastric cancer subjects (χ2 = 5.221, P = 0.022). The major allele homozygotes in all the SNPs were used as the reference genotypes. There were no significant differences between the gastric cancer case and gastritis control in the genotype frequency of the 4 polymorphisms of NOD2 gene. For NOD1 gene, the rs2907749 GG homozygote genotype and the recessive model (genotype GG vs GA + AA) showed a reduced risk for gastric cancer (adjusted OR, 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.95, P = 0.04 and adjusted OR, 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28-0.96, P = 0.04, respectively), whereas the rs7789045 TT homozygote genotype and both the dominant model (genotype TT + TA vs AA) and the recessive model (genotype TT vs TA + AA) showed an elevated risk for gastric cancer ( adjusted OR, 2.14, 95% CI: 1.20-3.82, P = 0.01; adjusted OR, 1.50, 95% CI: 1.01-2.22, P = 0.04 and adjusted OR, 1.87, 95% CI: 1.09-3.20, P = 0.02, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 3 Adjusted odds ratios for gastric cancer associated with NOD1 and NOD2 polymorphisms.
GenersIDChr1121GC groupGA groupAOR2 (95% CI)
HeterozygoteHomozygoteDominantRecessive
11/12/2211/12/22
NOD1rs171590487GT1/62/2333/38/11830.82 (0.52-1.31)/0.78 (0.49-1.22)/
rs29077497GA23/117/15622/62/760.92 (0.61-1.39)0.50 (0.26-0.95)a0.81 (0.55-1.19)0.52 (0.28-0.96)a
rs20758207AG32/118/145312/78/6830.70 (0.47-1.06)1.27 (0.62-2.64)0.78 (0.53-1.16)1.51 (0.75-3.04)
rs77890457TA65/126/10521/67/721.30 (0.85-1.99)2.14 (1.20-3.82)a1.50 (1.01-2.22)a1.87 (1.09-3.20)a
NOD2rs206708516GC0/46/2500/24/1361.04 (0.61-1.78)///
rs186175916CA8/69/2193/43/1140.79 (0.50-1.23)1.29 (0.33-4.97)0.82 (0.53-1.27)/
rs313550016AG16/111/16912/51/971.22 (0.80-1.85)0.73 (0.33-1.61)1.13 (0.76-1.67)0.68 (0.31-1.47)
rs720542316GC20/135/14114/61/851.31 (0.87-1.96)0.82 (0.39-1.72)1.22 (0.82-1.79)0.72 (0.35-1.48)

We next examined the joint effects of NOD1, NOD2 polymorphisms and H. pylori infection. Because of the limited number in H. pylori seronegative subjects (with 75 and 41 subjects in gastric cancer and gastritis groups, respectively), only the H. pylori seropositive subjects were considered for analysis. Logistic regression analysis showed that the NOD1 rs7789045 TT homozygote and the recessive model (genotype TT vs TA+AA) carriers had an elevated risk for gastric cancer, with adjusted OR, 2.05, 95% CI: 1.07-3.94, P = 0.03 and adjusted OR, 2.06, 95% CI: 1.13-3.76, P = 0.02, respectively. For the NOD2 gene, the rs3135500 AG heterozygote genotype had an increased risk for gastric cancer in H. pylori-positive subjects (adjusted OR, 2.65, 95% CI: 1.02-6.89, P = 0.05). Both the GC heterozygote and the dominant model (genotype CC+GC vs GG) of rs7205423 showed an elevated risk for gastric cancer (adjusted OR, 2.52, 95% CI: 1.05-6.04, P = 0.04 and adjusted OR, 2.38, 95% CI: 1.03-5.48, P = 0.04, respectively). We examined the association of the gene variations in NOD1 and NOD2 with intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer as well. The results showed that the NOD1 rs2907749 AA homozygote and the dominant model (genotype AA+GA vs GG) carriers (adjusted OR, 2.66, 95% CI: 1.10-6.44, P = 0.03 and adjusted OR, 2.47, 95% CI: 1.05-5.81, P = 0.04, respectively) together with the rs7789045 TT homozygote and the recessive model (genotype TT vs TA+AA) carriers (adjusted OR 2.97, 95% CI: 1.49-5.95, P < 0.01 and adjusted OR 2.53, 95% CI: 1.35-4.74, P < 0.01, respectively ) had a significantly elevated risk for developing diffuse-type gastric cancer. When H. pylori infection and the gastric cancer type were considered simultaneously, both the recessive model of rs2075820 (genotype GG vs GA+AA) and the rs7789045 TT homozygote or the recessive model (genotype TT vs TA+AA) in the NOD1 gene showed a significantly elevated risk for developing diffuse-type gastric cancer in H. pylori-positive subjects (adjusted OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.07-3.32, P = 0.03; adjusted OR 3.00, 95% CI: 1.38-6.53, P < 0.01; and adjusted OR 2.91, 95% CI: 1.45-5.87, P < 0.01, respectively ) (Table 4).

Table 4 Association of the risk single nucleotide polymorphisms in NOD1and NOD2 with two major gastric cancer types and Helicobacter pylori infection status.
TypeGenotypeHeterozygoteHomozygoteDominant modelRecessive model
AA1AaaaAOR2 (95% CI)PAOR (95% CI)PAOR (95% CI)PAOR (95% CI)P
NOD1 rs2907749 risk allele:A
Diffuse 125 cases684982.24 (0.91-5.53)0.082.66 (1.10-6.44)0.03a2.47 (1.05-5.81)0.04a1.39 (0.86-2.24)0.18
Intestinal 129 cases6652111.61 (0.71-3.67)0.261.58 (0.71-3.55)0.271.59 (0.73-3.46)0.241.09 (0.68-1.75)0.72
160 controls91618////////
NOD1 rs2075820 risk allele:G
Diffuse 125 cases6055130.45 (0.19-1.07)0.070.82 (0.36-1.90)0.650.63 (0.28-1.41)0.261.55 (0.96-2.51)0.08
Intestinal 128 cases6841160.54 (0.22-1.31)0.170.77 (0.32-1.85)0.560.65 (0.28-1.51)0.321.29 (0.79-2.08)0.31
158 controls687812////////
HP+ 220 cases11978230.39 (0.16-0.99)0.050.674 (0.27-1.68)0.400.53 (0.22-1.28)0.161.47 (0.93-2.31)0.10
HP+ diffuse 93 cases5627100.38 (0.13-1.13)0.080.85 (0.29-2.46)0.760.60 (0.21-1.70)0.341.89 (1.07-3.32)0.03a
HP+ 117 controls52587////////
NOD1 rs7789045 risk allele:T
Diffuse 125 cases3251421.36 (0.79-2.33)0.262.97 (1.49-5.95)0.00ab1.719 (1.045-2.828)0.03a2.53 (1.35-4.74)0.00ab
Intestinal 129 cases2260471.39 (0.83-2.32)0.211.55 (0.76-3.16)0.231.42 (0.88-2.31)0.151.31 (0.67-2.53)0.43
160 controls208555////////
HP+ 221 cases5686790.99 (0.60-1.62)0.962.05 (1.07-3.94)0.03a1.24 (0.79-1.97)0.352.06 (1.13-3.76)0.02a
HP+ diffuse 93 cases2834311.06 (0.56-2.01)0.873.00 (1.38-6.53)0.01ab1.50 (0.84-2.69)0.172.91 (1.45-5.87)0.00ab
HP+ 119 controls175349////////
NOD2 rs3135500 risk allele:G
HP+ 221 cases13279102.65 (1.02-6.89)0.05a2.20 (0.88-5.51)0.0912.35 (0.96-5.79)0.060.98 (0.62-1.55)0.92
HP+ 119 controls733511////////
NOD2 rs7205423 risk allele:C
HP+ 221 cases11297122.52 (1.05-6.04)0.04a2.26 (0.96-5.35)0.062.38 (1.03-5.48)0.04a1.04 (0.66-1.63)0.88
HP+ 119 controls614513////////
Haplotype and diplotype analysis of NOD1 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms selection

In a linkage disequilibrium analysis for all of the polymorphisms, we found suggestive evidence for the linkage of rs2907749, rs2075820 and rs7789045 polymorphisms (for rs2907749 and rs2075820, D′:0.935, LOD:19.93, r2:0.168; for rs2075820 and rs7789045, D′:1.0, LOD:49.28, r2:0.307; for rs2907749 and rs7789045, D′:0.949, LOD:38.97, r2:0.251) in the NOD1 gene. The five common haplotypes (AGT, AAA, GGA, GAA and AGA) in the gastritis control group accounted for 99% of all haplotypes (Table 5). The most common haplotype was AGT, occurring in 42% and 33% of the case and control groups, respectively, and the distribution of AGT was significantly different between cases and controls (P = 0.01).

Table 5 Frequencies of haplotype of NOD1.
Haplotype1FrequencyPP corrected2
GC (n = 296)GA (n = 160)
AGT0.420.330.01a0.04
AAA0.290.320.370.84
GGA0.250.320.02a0.08
GAA0.02< 0.010.050.23
AGA0.010.010.550.96

For the NOD1 gene, the diplotypes with frequencies > 5% include AGT/AAA, AAA/GGA, AGT/GGA, AGT/AGT, GGA/GGA and AAA/AAA, which accounted for 94% of all the diplotypes in the controls. Using the most common diplotype AGT/AAA as a reference group, our data showed that diplotype AGT/AGT was significantly associated with elevated gastric cancer risk, with OR, 1.98, 95% CI: 1.04-3.79, P = 0.04 (Table 6).

Table 6 Associations of NOD1 diplotypes and gastric cancer risk n (%).
DiplotypeGC (n = 296)GA (n = 160)AOR1 (95% CI)P
AGT/AAA58 (20)38 (24)1
AAA/GGA47 (16)35 (22)0.87 (0.48-1.59)0.65
AGT/GGA54 (18)25 (16)1.45 (0.77-2.74)0.25
AGT/AGT63 (21)21 (13)1.98 (1.04-3.80)0.04a
GGA/GGA22 (7)20 (13)0.72 (0.34-1.50)0.38
AAA/AAA30 (10)12 (8)1.69 (0.76-3.72)0.20
Others22 (7)9 (6)1.58 (0.65-3.81)0.31

The distribution of the NOD1 diplotypes between gastric cancer and gastritis subjects infected with H. pylori was significantly different from when the H. pylori infection status was not considered. The results showed that the diplotypes AGT/GGA, AGT/AGT and AAA/AAA were significantly associated with elevated gastric cancer risk when compared with the diplotype AGT/AAA, with adjusted OR, 2.14, 95% CI: 1.01-4.51, P = 0.05, adjusted OR, 3.07, 95% CI: 1.47-6.41, P < 0.01, adjusted OR, 2.96, 95% CI: 1.10-7.92, P = 0.03, respectively. The risks of intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer associated with diplotypes in the NOD1 and NOD2 genes were also estimated. The results showed that AGT/AGT was significantly associated with elevated diffuse-type gastric cancer risk compared with the diplotype AGT/AAA, with adjusted OR, 2.56, 95% CI: 1.17-5.58, P = 0.02. The risk of diffuse-type gastric cancer related to the NOD1 diplotype AGT/AGT was further examined with stratification by H. pylori infection. As expected, the OR value of diffuse-type gastric cancer with H. pylori infection for subjects carrying the AGT/AGT diplotype was 4.02, 95% CI: 1.61-10.05, P < 0.01, which was higher than that of the H. pylori infection group or diffuse-type group alone (Table 7). The NOD2 polymorphism was associated with neither the intestinal-type nor the diffuse-type gastric cancer in this study.

Table 7 Associations of NOD1 diplotypes and gastric cancer with two major types and Helicobacter pylori infection status.
Diplotype
AGT/AAAAAA/GGAAGT/GGAAGT/AGTGGA/GGAAAA/AAAOthers
HP+ GC (n = 221)34 (15)35 (16)41 (19)54 (24)18 (8)22 (10)17 (8)
HP+ GA (n = 119)32 (27)22 (18)18 (15)17 (14)16 (13)7 (6)7 (6)
AOR1 (95% CI)11.49 (0.72-3.08)2.14 (1.01-4.51)a3.07 (1.47-6.41)a1.09 (0.47-2.53)2.96 (1.10-7.92)a2.44 (0.89-6.71)
P0.280.05a0.002ab0.830.03a0.08
Diffuse GC (n = 125)21 (17)17 (14)26 (21)30 (24)8 (6)16 (13)7 (6)
GA (n = 160)38 (24)35 (22)25 (16)21 (13)20 (13)12 (8)9 (6)
AOR (95% CI)10.84 (0.38-1.88)1.66 (0.76-3.61)2.56 (1.17-5.58)a0.66 (0.24-1.77)2.01 (0.78-5.16)1.33 (0.43-4.14)
P0.680.200.02a0.410.150.62
Intestinal GC (n = 129)29 (23)22 (17)25 (19)22 (17)11 (9)12 (9)8 (6)
GA (n = 160)38 (24)35 (22)25 (16)21 (13)20 (13)12 (8)9 (6)
AOR (95% CI)10.83 (0.40-1.73)1.64 (0.76-3.54)1.43 (0.65-3.14)0.84 (0.34-2.06)1.62 (0.619-4.26)1.13 (0.38-3.34)
P0.620.200.380.690.320.83
HP+ diffuse GC (n = 93)12 (13)13 (14)19 (20)26 (28)7 (8)10 (11)6 (7)
HP+ GA (n = 119)32 (27)22 (19)18 (15)17 (14)16 (13)7 (6)7 (6)
AOR (95% CI)11.42 (0.53-3.76)2.36 (0.91-6.08)4.02 (1.61-10.05)a1.09 (0.35-3.38)3.12 (0.94-10.40)2.30 (0.63-8.44)
P0.480.080.002ab0.880.060.21
DISCUSSION

In the present study, we investigated the association between NOD1 and NOD2 gene polymorphisms and the risk of gastric cancer in a Chinese population. To clarify the impact of genetic variation in NOD1 and NOD2 on the difference of H. pylori-related clinical outcomes, gastritis patients and gastric cancer patients were selected as cases and controls. We found that subjects who carried the NOD1 rs7789045 TT genotype had an increased risk for gastric cancer. Furthermore, the risk was even more distinct when stratified by H. pylori infection and in the diffuse-type gastric cancer group. Moreover, individuals with certain haplotypes and diplotypes derived from three TagSNPs of the NOD1 gene had a significantly elevated risk of gastric cancer, suggesting that the combined effects of several SNPs may be detected by haplotype-based analyses. To our best knowledge, this is the first study investigating the impact of the NOD1 and NOD2 polymorphisms on susceptibility to gastric cancer in a Chinese population.

NOD1 consists of a C-terminal LRR (Leucine-rich region), a central NOD, and an N-terminal CARD (caspase-activating domain) domain[14]. NOD1 has emerged as a crucial factor for maintaining a basal level of immune activation. Clarke et al[25] showed the important role for peptidoglycan in priming systemic innate immunity and for NOD1 as a homeostatic regulator. The majority of patients with H. pylori-associated gastritis have higher NOD1 expression in gastric epithelial cells as compared with controls or H. pylori-non-associated gastritis[21], which suggests the involvement of NOD1 signaling in the development of human gastric inflammation. Recently, it has been demonstrated that H. pylori virulence factors and the NOD1 receptor ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 accumulated in human superficial-foveolar epithelium and its metaplastic or dysplastic foci in a discrete cytoplasmic structure named the particle-rich cytoplasmic structure (PaCS). PaCS modulates immune-inflammatory and proliferative responses of the gastric epithelium of potential pathologic relevance[26]. Therefore, the function alteration of NOD1 due to the gene polymorphisms may contribute to the development of H. pylori-related gastric cancer.

It has been suggested that the AA homozygote of the E266K (rs2075820) NOD1 gene polymorphism increases the risk of peptic ulceration in H. pylori-positive patients in the Hungarian population[18]. Another report indicated that E266K A allele carriers have an increased risk of occurrence of intestinal metaplasia and atrophy and eradication failure in the Turkish population[19]. The rs2075820 SNP was chosen in the coding sequence of the NOD1 gene in exon 3 as it was earlier reported to encode a changed protein (E266K) in the nucleotide-binding domain altering a glutamic acid residue, suggesting a potential functional effect of the mutation[27]. Our result indicated that the AG heterozygote of rs2075820 was protective against the risk of gastric cancer (P = 0.026) while the AA homozygote showed moderate risk of gastric cancer (P = 0.397) in the H. pylori-positive subjects. There are no exact data that demonstrate how the NOD1 polymorphism alters the function of NOD1, but our results suggest that the change of negatively-charged glutamine to positively-charged lysine may cause a drastic change in the structure or regulation of the NOD1 protein that alters the reactivity to H. pylori or the nature of downstream inflammatory pathways.

Two studies focusing on the association of several NOD1 polymorphisms with colorectal and endometrial cancer, which include SNP rs2907749, did not find any relationship between individual NOD1 genotypes and the susceptibility to these cancers[28,29]. However, an association of the NOD1 polymorphisms with atopic eczema in the German population has been reported in a study that examined the effects of 11 SNPs, which covering the complete NOD1 gene, on atopy phenotypes[30]. One NOD1 haplotype and three polymorphisms (rs2907748, rs2907749, and rs2075822) were significantly associated with atopic eczema in a population-based cohort, case-control population, and/or family-based association analysis. The results indicated that genetic variants within the NOD1 gene were important determinants of atopy susceptibility. Especially, it showed that the A allele at rs2907749 is significantly associated with elevated IgE levels. Similarly, our study found that the A allele at rs2907749 elevated the risk of gastric cancer; moreover, the risk association was strengthened in diffuse-type gastric cancer patients. Rs2907749 is located in intron 9 of the NOD1 gene where two putative transcription factor-binding sites for Pax1 are found. The alteration of the allele changes the computer-predicted Pax1-binding probability next to exon 9, which may influence the T-regulatory cell development[30].

The NOD1 rs7789045 TT genotype was at a significantly elevated risk for gastric cancer in this study. Few studies have addressed the relationship of the polymorphism in rs7789045 with clinical diseases before, whereas our result indicated that this polymorphism was worthy to be further studied because it may play important roles in the H. pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis. Rs7789045 is located in intron 5 of the NOD1 gene, which is in the splicing region. The possible significance of T/A alteration was predicted by NetGene2 and SpliceView computer programs[31-33]. Different splicing may lead to the alteration of NOD1 caspase activity in the CARD domain; therefore, this may imply a difference in the signal pathway regulation downstream.

Because haplotype analyses may be of higher informative value to draw associations between the phenotypes and genetic variation than SNPs[34], we also assessed the effects of haplotypes and diplotypes in our studies. Analyses revealed significant association between the NOD1 haplotype AGT (rs2907749, rs2075820, and rs7789045) and gastric cancer, and the difference remained significant after a 10 000-times permutation test. Our results also showed that the AGT/AGT diplotype was associated with an increased risk of diffuse-type gastric cancer, and the risk was more evident in H. pylori-positive subjects. Some studies have observed the inverse associations of H. pylori and atopic diseases such as asthma and atopic eczema[35,36]. Epidemiological observations are consistent with the hypothesis that H. pylori, which has been colonizing the human stomach for ≥ 58 000 years and is usually acquired within the first few years of life, may play distinct roles in the maturation of the immune system[37]. Weidinger et al[30] demonstrated that the haplotype A-G-T-A-C-C-G-T-A-C-G, defined by the eleven polymorphic alleles of NOD1 including rs2907749 A allele and rs2075818 C allele, rs2235099 C allele, rs2075821 G allele, the last three of which are in a linkage with rs2075820 G allele in the AGT haplotype, is significantly protective against the development of atopic eczema, whereas haplotype AGT is associated with an increased risk of H. pylori-related gastric cancer in this study. The different relationships of the similar haplotype of NOD1 between two diseases may imply the distinct roles of NOD1 in the pathogenesis of atopy and gastric cancer.

Some studies have investigated the relationships among the three major mutations, R702W (rs2066844), G908R (rs2066845) and 3020insC (rs5743293), in the coding region of the NOD2 gene with colorectal cancer[38], gastric cancer[20] and gastrointestinal diseases[22] in the European population. The results showed that NOD2 polymorphisms increase the susceptibility to gastrointestinal cancer. These three polymorphisms were shown to be monomorphic sites in the Chinese population due to the ethnic difference (Hapmap and Genome Variation Server). In this study, the association between the other four NOD1 SNPs and gastric cancer was investigated in the Chinese population. Although no significant differences on genotype distribution were found between gastric cancer and gastritis patients, our results indicated that the AG heterozygote genotype of rs3135500 and CC genotype of rs7205423 were associated with an increased risk for gastric cancer in H. pylori-positive subjects. It is notable that rs3135500 is located in the 3’UTR of the NOD2 gene while rs7205423 is located in the intergenic region between the NOD2 gene and the CYLD gene. The latter is a de-ubiquitinating enzyme that inhibits the activation of the NF-κB, which has key roles in inflammation, immune responses, carcinogenesis, and protection against apoptosis[39]. And the G allele of rs7205423 may be at a splice site, which was predicted by NetGene2 and SpliceView computer programs[31-33]. Another article of Weidinger et al[40] showed that the presence of the A allele at rs3135500 was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing asthma. On the contrary, our results showed that A allele at rs3135500 was associated with a slightly reduced risk of developing gastric cancer. The results of the two association studies of the NOD2 polymorphisms were in accordance with those of the NOD1 polymorphisms we mentioned above. These results emphasized that polymorphisms of NOD1 and NOD2 may contribute differently to the development of atopic diseases and gastric cancer.

Our study has some limitations. The number of participants in this study was relatively small, and thus, future replication studies with large cohorts are needed. Further expression analysis and transcription factor-binding studies are needed to clarify the functional role of NOD1 and NOD2 polymorphisms. Finally, H. pylori is genetically a highly diverse bacteria, and the virulence of H. pylori is related to different subtypes that contribute differently to clinical outcomes. However, anti-CagA antibodies were not available in our study.

In conclusion, to our knowledge, this study is the first one to indicate that the NOD1 rs7789045 polymorphism increases the genetic susceptibility of gastric cancer in a Chinese population, and it is observed to be enhanced in H. pylori-positive and diffuse-type gastric cancer subjects. The other two polymorphisms, rs2907749 and rs2075820, showed an association with gastric cancer as well. In addition, H. pylori-positive subjects carrying the NOD2 rs7205423 C allele have an increased risk of gastric cancer. These findings suggest that the polymorphisms of the NOD1 and NOD2 genes may play a role between H. pylori infection and development of gastric cancer. The underlying mechanism needs further investigation.

COMMENTS
Background

The role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in the development of gastric cancer has been confirmed. It is known that H. pylori is an important factor in both the induction of gastritis and the histological progression to gastric cancer. The NOD (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain) proteins NOD1 and NOD2 play distinct roles in innate immunity as sensors of H. pylori components derived from bacterial peptidoglycan. The H. pylori infection may interact with the polymorphisms of NOD1 and NOD2, which influence the development of gastric cancer. In this hospital-based case-control study, the author analyzed the associations between the polymorphisms of NOD1 and NOD2 and the risk for H. pylori-related gastric cancer in a Chinese population.

Research frontiers

It has been confirmed that the H. pylori peptidoglycan delivered by the type IV secretion system can be sensed via NOD1. The polymorphisms of NOD2 was associated with gastric lymphoma. The current study is the first to access the impact of the TagSNPs of NOD1 and NOD2 and disease susceptibility to gastric cancer in a Chinese population.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This study indicated that genetic polymorphisms of NOD1 and NOD2 may interaction with H. pylori infection and may play distinct roles in developing gastric cancer in the Chinese population.

Applications

This is an original report of the association between NOD1 and NOD2 polymorphisms and Chinese patients with gastric cancer. It is believed these findings will be valuable in clarifying the relationship between genetic variation within innate immune molecules and H. pylori infection-related gastric cancer.

Peer review

The study examined NOD1/NOD2 polymorphisms in association with H. pylori infection in the patients of gastric cancer (296) vs gastritis (160). The results indicate that H. pylori-induced gastric cancer is associated with the genetic background of the patients. The data are useful. The study is in focus but can be expanded to include more factors such as smoking status, body mass index, age, etc. The written English needs some improvement.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Dr. Jianyuan Chai, PhD, MS, BS, Assistant Professor, Research (09-151), VA Long Beach Healthcare System, 5901 E. 7th St, Long Beach, CA 90822, United States

S- Editor Shi ZF L- Editor A E- Editor Zheng XM

References
1.  Wang KJ, Wang RT. [Meta-analysis on the epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in China]. Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi. 2003;24:443-446.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:3030-3044.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1946]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1920]  [Article Influence: 106.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Sun XD, Mu R, Zhou YS, Dai XD, Zhang SW, Huangfu XM, Sun J, Li LD, Lu FZ, Qiao YL. [Analysis of mortality rate of stomach cancer and its trend in twenty years in China]. Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi. 2004;26:4-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420:860-867.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10123]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10863]  [Article Influence: 493.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Fox JG, Wang TC. Inflammation, atrophy, and gastric cancer. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:60-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 587]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 593]  [Article Influence: 34.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Shacter E, Weitzman SA. Chronic inflammation and cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2002;16:217-226, 229; discussion 230-232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Vieth M, Stolte M. Elevated risk for gastric adenocarcinoma can be predicted from histomorphology. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6109-6114.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  El-Omar EM, Carrington M, Chow WH, McColl KE, Bream JH, Young HA, Herrera J, Lissowska J, Yuan CC, Rothman N. The role of interleukin-1 polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. Nature. 2001;412:99.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 140]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 152]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  El-Omar EM, Rabkin CS, Gammon MD, Vaughan TL, Risch HA, Schoenberg JB, Stanford JL, Mayne ST, Goedert J, Blot WJ. Increased risk of noncardia gastric cancer associated with proinflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1193-1201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 672]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 650]  [Article Influence: 31.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Lochhead P, El-Omar EM. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21:281-297.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
11.  Machado JC, Figueiredo C, Canedo P, Pharoah P, Carvalho R, Nabais S, Castro Alves C, Campos ML, Van Doorn LJ, Caldas C. A proinflammatory genetic profile increases the risk for chronic atrophic gastritis and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:364-371.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 346]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 345]  [Article Influence: 16.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Inohara C, Nuñez G. NOD-LRR proteins: role in host-microbial interactions and inflammatory disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:355-383.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 728]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 699]  [Article Influence: 36.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Inohara N, Nuñez G. NODs: intracellular proteins involved in inflammation and apoptosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:371-382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 757]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 722]  [Article Influence: 34.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Strober W, Murray PJ, Kitani A, Watanabe T. Signalling pathways and molecular interactions of NOD1 and NOD2. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:9-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 584]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 580]  [Article Influence: 32.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Girardin SE, Tournebize R, Mavris M, Page AL, Li X, Stark GR, Bertin J, DiStefano PS, Yaniv M, Sansonetti PJ. CARD4/Nod1 mediates NF-kappaB and JNK activation by invasive Shigella flexneri. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:736-742.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Hirata Y, Ohmae T, Shibata W, Maeda S, Ogura K, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M. MyD88 and TNF receptor-associated factor 6 are critical signal transducers in Helicobacter pylori-infected human epithelial cells. J Immunol. 2006;176:3796-3803.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Kobayashi KS, Chamaillard M, Ogura Y, Henegariu O, Inohara N, Nuñez G, Flavell RA. Nod2-dependent regulation of innate and adaptive immunity in the intestinal tract. Science. 2005;307:731-734.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1334]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1311]  [Article Influence: 69.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
18.  Hofner P, Gyulai Z, Kiss ZF, Tiszai A, Tiszlavicz L, Tóth G, Szõke D, Molnár B, Lonovics J, Tulassay Z. Genetic polymorphisms of NOD1 and IL-8, but not polymorphisms of TLR4 genes, are associated with Helicobacter pylori-induced duodenal ulcer and gastritis. Helicobacter. 2007;12:124-131.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Kara B, Akkiz H, Doran F, Bayram S, Erken E, Gumurdullu Y, Sandikci M. The significance of E266K polymorphism in the NOD1 gene on Helicobacter pylori infection: an effective force on pathogenesis? Clin Exp Med. 2010;10:107-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Angeletti S, Galluzzo S, Santini D, Ruzzo A, Vincenzi B, Ferraro E, Spoto C, Lorino G, Graziano N, Calvieri A. NOD2/CARD15 polymorphisms impair innate immunity and increase susceptibility to gastric cancer in an Italian population. Hum Immunol. 2009;70:729-732.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Rosenstiel P, Hellmig S, Hampe J, Ott S, Till A, Fischbach W, Sahly H, Lucius R, Fölsch UR, Philpott D. Influence of polymorphisms in the NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 genes on the clinical outcome of Helicobacter pylori infection. Cell Microbiol. 2006;8:1188-1198.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Yazdanyar S, Nordestgaard BG. NOD2/CARD15 genotype and common gastrointestinal diseases in 43,600 individuals. J Intern Med. 2010;267:228-236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559-575.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24221]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22567]  [Article Influence: 1327.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263-265.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10996]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11659]  [Article Influence: 583.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Clarke TB, Davis KM, Lysenko ES, Zhou AY, Yu Y, Weiser JN. Recognition of peptidoglycan from the microbiota by Nod1 enhances systemic innate immunity. Nat Med. 2010;16:228-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 793]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 855]  [Article Influence: 61.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Necchi V, Sommi P, Ricci V, Solcia E. In vivo accumulation of Helicobacter pylori products, NOD1, ubiquitinated proteins and proteasome in a novel cytoplasmic structure. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9716.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Zouali H, Lesage S, Merlin F, Cézard JP, Colombel JF, Belaiche J, Almer S, Tysk C, O'Morain C, Gassull M. CARD4/NOD1 is not involved in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2003;52:71-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Ashton KA, Proietto A, Otton G, Symonds I, McEvoy M, Attia J, Scott RJ. Toll-like receptor (TLR) and nucleosome-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) gene polymorphisms and endometrial cancer risk. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Möckelmann N, von Schönfels W, Buch S, von Kampen O, Sipos B, Egberts JH, Rosenstiel P, Franke A, Brosch M, Hinz S. Investigation of innate immunity genes CARD4, CARD8 and CARD15 as germline susceptibility factors for colorectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Weidinger S, Klopp N, Rummler L, Wagenpfeil S, Novak N, Baurecht HJ, Groer W, Darsow U, Heinrich J, Gauger A. Association of NOD1 polymorphisms with atopic eczema and related phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:177-184.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 6.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Brunak S, Engelbrecht J, Knudsen S. Prediction of human mRNA donor and acceptor sites from the DNA sequence. J Mol Biol. 1991;220:49-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 541]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 529]  [Article Influence: 16.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Hebsgaard SM, Korning PG, Tolstrup N, Engelbrecht J, Rouzé P, Brunak S. Splice site prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana pre-mRNA by combining local and global sequence information. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24:3439-3452.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Rogozin IB, Milanesi L. Analysis of donor splice sites in different eukaryotic organisms. J Mol Evol. 1997;45:50-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 104]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, Moore JM, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, Higgins J, DeFelice M, Lochner A, Faggart M. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002;296:2225-2229.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4324]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4287]  [Article Influence: 194.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Chen Y, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori colonization is inversely associated with childhood asthma. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:553-560.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 270]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 270]  [Article Influence: 16.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Herbarth O, Bauer M, Fritz GJ, Herbarth P, Rolle-Kampczyk U, Krumbiegel P, Richter M, Richter T. Helicobacter pylori colonisation and eczema. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:638-640.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Malaty HM, El-Kasabany A, Graham DY, Miller CC, Reddy SG, Srinivasan SR, Yamaoka Y, Berenson GS. Age at acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection: a follow-up study from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2002;359:931-935.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 280]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 267]  [Article Influence: 12.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Papaconstantinou I, Theodoropoulos G, Gazouli M, Panoussopoulos D, Mantzaris GJ, Felekouras E, Bramis J. Association between mutations in the CARD15/NOD2 gene and colorectal cancer in a Greek population. Int J Cancer. 2005;114:433-435.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Courtois G. Tumor suppressor CYLD: negative regulation of NF-kappaB signaling and more. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:1123-1132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Weidinger S, Klopp N, Rümmler L, Wagenpfeil S, Baurecht HJ, Gauger A, Darsow U, Jakob T, Novak N, Schäfer T. Association of CARD15 polymorphisms with atopy-related traits in a population-based cohort of Caucasian adults. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35:866-872.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]