Lee SW, Chang CM, Chang CS, Kao AW, Chou MC. Comparison of presentation and impact on quality of life of gastroesophageal reflux disease between young and old adults in a Chinese population. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(41): 4614-4618 [PMID: 22147968 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4614]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Ming-Chih Chou, Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan 110, Section 1, Chien Kuo North Road, Taichung 40242, Taiwan, China. ericest429@yahoo.com.tw
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Shou-Wu Lee, Chi-Sen Chang, Ming-Chih Chou, Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40242, Taiwan, China
Shou-Wu Lee, Chi-Sen Chang, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40242, Taiwan, China
Shou-Wu Lee, Chi-Sen Chang, Department of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40242, Taiwan, China
Chia-Ming Chang, Ai-Wen Kao, Institute of Gerontology, National Cheng Kang University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan, China
Chia-Ming Chang, Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kang University Hospital, Tainan 70101, Taiwan, China
Ai-Wen Kao, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kang University Hospital, Tainan 70101, Taiwan, China
ORCID number: $[AuthorORCIDs]
Author contributions: Lee SW and Chou MC contributed equally to this work; Lee SW, Chang CM and Chang CS designed the research; Lee SW and Chang CS performed the research; Kao AW and Chou MC contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Lee SW and Chang CM analyzed the data; and Lee SW, Chang CM and Chang CS wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Dr. Ming-Chih Chou, Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan 110, Section 1, Chien Kuo North Road, Taichung 40242, Taiwan, China. ericest429@yahoo.com.tw
Received: January 31, 2011 Revised: June 27, 2011 Accepted: August 3, 2011 Published online: November 7, 2011
Abstract
AIM: To compare the presentation and impact on quality of life of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in old and young age groups.
METHODS: Data from adult patients with GERD diagnosed by endoscopic and symptomic characteristics were collected between January and November 2009. Exclusion criteria included combined peptic ulcers, malignancy, prior surgery, antacid medication for more than 2 mo, and pregnancy. Enrolled patients were assigned to the elderly group if they were 65 years or older, or the younger group if they were under 65 years. They had completed the GERD impact scale, the Chinese GERD questionnaire, and the SF-36 questionnaire. Data from other cases without endoscopic findings or symptoms were collected and these subjects comprised the control group in our study.
RESULTS: There were 111 patients with GERD and 44 normal cases: 78 (70.3%) and 33 patients (29.7%) were in the younger and elderly groups, respectively. There were more female patients (60.3%) in the younger group, and more males (72.7%) in the elderly group. The younger cases had more severe and frequent typical symptoms than the elderly patients. Significantly more impairment of daily activities was noted in the younger patients compared with the elderly group, except for physical functioning.
CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with GERD were predominantly male with rare presentation of typical symptoms, and had less impaired quality of life compared with younger patients in a Chinese population.
Citation: Lee SW, Chang CM, Chang CS, Kao AW, Chou MC. Comparison of presentation and impact on quality of life of gastroesophageal reflux disease between young and old adults in a Chinese population. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(41): 4614-4618
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease which has a considerable, impact on the everyday lives of affected individuals, and interferes with physical activity, impairs social functioning, disturbs sleep and reduces productivity at work[1]. The prevalence of the disease increases with age[2,3], and advanced age has been identified as a significant risk factor for relapse of esophagitis[4,5]. Furthermore, elderly patients present less frequently with the typical symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and abdominal or chest pain, which are quite different from those of young subjects[6,7]. Several previous studies assessed clinical symptoms and quality of life of GERD patients using the GERD impact scale[8], Chinese GERD questionnaire (GERDQ)[9], and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire[10,11]. However, to date, no studies have been conducted to compare the quality of life of young and old patients with GERD. The aim of this study was to compare the presentation and impact on quality of life of GERD in younger and elderly patients in a Chinese population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data from consecutive patients with GERD in our hospital were collected between January 2009 and November 2009. All patients underwent an open-access transoral upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and those who were diagnosed with erosive esophagitis, or had typical symptoms, were considered for inclusion in the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) GERD combined with other structural gastrointestinal disorders, such as peptic ulcer disease, esophageal or gastric malignancy; (2) prior gastric surgery; (3) use of chronic antacid medication, such as proton pump inhibitors or H2-receptor antagonists, for more than 2 mo prior to enrollment; and (4) pregnancy.
The enrolled patients were assigned to the younger group if they were under the age of 65 years; patients 65 years and over were assigned to the elderly group. All cases were asked to complete the GERD impact scale, the Chinese GERDQ, and the SF-36 questionnaire (Chinese
version), and results were compared between the two groups. Data from other cases without endoscopic findings of erosive esophagitis or symptoms related with GERD were collected and these subjects served as the control group in our study. All study participants completed the SF-36 questionnaire, a widely used health survey.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD deviation for each of the measured parameters. A P value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical comparisons were made using Pearson’s χ2 test, or Fisher’s exact test, to compare the effects of gender and endoscopic or clinical reflux esophagitis severity, and the independent Student t test was used to analyze scores of each scale and questionnaire.
RESULTS
Among all enrolled consecutive patients between January and November 2009, there were 111 with GERD and 44 normal cases. Patients’ characteristics and endoscopic reflux esophagitis severity are shown in Table 1. Among the patients with GERD, there were 78 patients (70.3%) in the younger group and 33 cases (29.7%) in the elderly group. A similar duration of symptoms was noted between the younger cases (mean 2.82 years) and the elderly cases (mean 2.50 years). Comparing the gender of each group, there were significantly more female patients (60.3%) in the younger group, and more male patients (72.7%) in the elderly group. The elderly patients had greater endoscopic disease severity than the younger patients, based on the Los Angeles classification.
Table 1 Characteristics and endoscopic symptoms in younger and elderly cases with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
The presentation of the younger and elderly patients with GERD in our study are summarized in Table 2, which show the results of the GERD impact scale. As shown in Table 2, the young cases had a higher prevalence of typical symptoms than the elderly patients, including burning (48.7% vs 15.2%, P = 0.005), pain in chest (64.3% vs 33.3%, P = 0.001), regurgitation of food (79.5% vs 54.6%, P = 0.058), hoarseness (73.1% vs 39.4%, P = 0.010) and chronic conditions related to heartburn (44.8% vs 33.3%, P = 0.708).
Table 2 Symptom presentation measured by gastroesophageal reflux disease impact scale in younger and elderly patients.
GERD impact scale
Young group(n = 78, 70.3%)
Elderly group(n = 33, 29.7%)
n (%)
n (%)
P value
Burning
0.005
None of the time
30 (38.50)
22 (66.70)
A little of the time
34 (43.60)
1 (3.00)
Some of the time
9 (11.50)
9 (27.30)
All of the time
6 (6.40)
1 (3.00)
Pain in chest
0.001
None of the time
40 (51.30)
28 (84.80)
A little of the time
28 (35.90)
4 (12.20)
Some of the time
9 (11.50)
0
All of the time
1 (1.30)
1 (3.00)
Food coming into mouth
0.058
None of the time
16 (20.50)
15 (49.40)
A little of the time
48 (61.50)
13 (39.40)
Some of the time
7 (9.00)
2 (6.10)
All of the time
7 (9.00)
3 (9.10)
Hoarseness
0.01
None of the time
21 (55.20)
20 (60.60)
A little of the time
37 (26.90)
8 (24.20)
Some of the time
15 (11.50)
4 (12.20)
All of the time
5 (6.40)
1 (3.00)
Chronic heartburn
0.708
None of the time
43 (55.20)
22 (66.70)
A little of the time
21 (26.90)
6 (18.10)
Some of the time
9 (11.50)
3 (9.10)
All of the time
5 (6.40)
2 (6.10)
The quality of life results in the two groups measured by the GERD impact scale are shown in Table 3, and the SF-36 questionnaire results are shown in Table 4 and Figure 1. As shown in Table 3, significantly impaired activities of daily living, including sleep disturbance (52.6% vs 18.2%, P = 0.004), feeding and drinking problems (64.1% vs 12.1%, P = 0.001), and impact on social activites (43.6% vs 15.2%, P = 0.005), were noted in the younger patients.
Figure 1 Scores of SF36 questionnaire among the control cases, and younger and elderly cases with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
T: Total SF36 scores; P: Total physical health scores; M: Total metal health scores; RP: Role-physical; RF: Physical functioning; BP: Bodily pain; GH: General perception; VT: Vitality; MH: Mental health; SF: Social functioning; RE: Role-emotional; GERD: Gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Table 3 Quality of life measured by quality of life of gastroesophageal reflux disease impact scale in younger and elderly cases.
GERD impact scale
Young group(n = 78, 70.3%)
Elderly group(n = 33, 29.7%)
n (%)
n (%)
P value
Sleep disturbance
0.004
None of the time
37 (47.40)
27 (81.80)
A little of the time
26 (33.30)
4 (12.10)
Some of the time
8 (10.30)
0
All of the time
7 (9.00)
2 (6.10)
Food and drink problems
0.001
None of the time
28 (35.90)
29 (78.90)
A little of the time
31 (39.70)
3 (9.10)
Some of the time
6 (7.7)
0
All of the time
13 (16.70)
1 (3.00)
Social interference
0.005
None of the time
44 (56.40)
28 (84.80)
A little of the time
27 (34.60)
3 (9.10)
Some of the time
6 (7.70)
0
All of the time
1 (1.30)
2 (6.10)
Table 4 Scores of SF36 questionnaire in younger and elderly cases with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
SF-36
Younger group(n = 78, 70.3%)
Elderly group(n = 33, 29.7%)
mean ± SD
mean ± SD
P value
Total SF 36 score
64.58 ± 16.84
70.73 ± 18.50
0.106
Total physical health scores
64.54 ± 15.96
60.03 ± 19.06
0.24
Total metal health scores
54.77 ± 16.18
66.18 ± 15.10
0.011
Physical functioning
90.26 ± 15.52
88.36 ± 21.00
0.342
Role-physical
72.76 ± 41.91
71.21 ± 39.09
0.853
Bodily pain
62.70 ± 18.35
69.18 ± 17.99
0.089
General perception
46.47 ± 18.06
58.09 ± 19.60
0.005
Vitality
51.22 ± 18.36
61.63 ± 19.46
0.013
Social functioning
72.18 ± 18.70
76.76 ± 19.73
0.263
Role-emotional
66.24 ± 45.76
76.82 ± 36.78
0.203
Mental health
54.77 ± 16.18
66.18 ± 15.10
0.001
As shown in Figure 1, comparing the quality of life between cases with and without GERD, patients with GERD had lower scores in all items of the SF-36 questionnaire, except physical functioning. With regard to age, as shown in Table 3, younger patients had higher scores than elderly patients in the items of physical functioning (mean 90.26 vs 86.39, P = 0.342), role-physical limitations (mean 72.76 vs 71.21, P = 0.853), and total physcial health status (mean 64.54 vs 60.03, P = 0.240). In contrast, younger patients had lower scores than elderly patients for the following items: bodily pain (mean 62.70 vs 69.18, P = 0.089), general perception of health (mean 46.47 vs 58.09, P = 0.005), vitality (mean 51.22 vs 61.36, P = 0.013), social functioning (mean 72.18 vs 76.76, P = 0.263), emotional limitations (mean 66.24 vs 76.82, P = 0.203), mental health status (mean 54.77 vs 66.18, P = 0.001), total mental health status (mean 58.15 vs 67.76, P = 0.011), and total health status (mean 64.58 vs 70.73, P = 0.106).
DISCUSSION
GERD is a chronic disease that tends to relapse and develop complications[12], and it is reported to be more severe and to have a higher incidence of severe complications in older vs younger patients[4,13,14]. Moreover, clinical features of GERD in old patients are quite different from those of younger adult subjects, with the elderly presenting less frequently with the typical symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, and pain[15]. Our study findings showed similar results in that most typical symptoms of GERD occurred in the younger patients, but occurred more rarely in the older subjects. The only exception in our study was that acid regurgitation was more frequent in older patients than in young ones, but this difference was non-significant. Hence, the typical esophageal symptoms of GERD, such as heartburn, are unreliable markers when diagnosing this disease in elderly patients[16].
Interestingly, the symptom of hoarseness, which is often considered an extraesophageal symptom of GERD[17], was also more frequently noted in the younger patients. Our results demonstrated that the younger patients with GERD not only had more typical esophageal symptoms but also more extraesophageal symptoms than in the elderly group. Furthermore, a previous study reported roughly one-third of elderly patients may have none of the symptoms usually associated with GERD[6]. It has been suggested that old patients may display symptoms in a different manner compared with young patients.
Patients with GERD may present with a broad range of troublesome symptoms that can damage the quality of their daily lives[18,19]. The negative effects of GERD are dependent on the frequency and severity of symptoms rather than the presence of esophagitis. Studies conducted in Sweden’s general population, which assessed the impact of the severity and frequency of GERD symptoms showed that even symptoms rated as mild are associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in wellbeing[20]. A German study determined that patients with symptoms of GERD had substantially impaired physical and psychosocial aspects of wellbeing compared with the general population, and felt restricted as a result of food and drink problems, disturbed sleep, and impaired vitality and emotional wellbeing[18]. A Chinese study reported that the largest decrements in quality of life scores among all subscales in subjects with GERD symptoms were related to bodily pain and role limitations[21]. Another study found that patients with GERD reported more impairment due to pain but less impairment with regard to physical and role functioning[11]. Our study yielded similar results, namely, that patients with GERD reported impaired quality of life in all dimensions, except physical functioning, compared with quality of life in the normal population.
The quality of life findings revealed slightly lower physical scores in elderly patients with GERD. It is possible that the increased disability or frailty associated with aging may account for the lower physical functioning. In addition, compared with elderly patients, significantly impaired mental health and vitality in the younger GERD patients was found in our study. That is, severity and frequency of symptoms of GERD were associated with impaired quality of life. This finding is consistent with the results of a previous study which showed both severity and perceived discomfort of symptoms were valid markers of the degree of quality of life impairment[22,23].
There were some limitations in our study. Firstly, some personal matters and other co-morbidity of diseases, which tend to influence quality of life, such as psychiatric factors[24], central obesity[25], chronic heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma[26] were not considered. These might have led to scoring bias in the questionnaire. Secondly, overlap of GERD with inflmmatory bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia should be considered. The overlaps were common and might worsen scores of questionnaries in our study according to a previous report[27]. Thirdly, our study design was hospital-based. Further research should include representative samples from the general population to confirm these results.
In conclusion, in the present study, elderly and younger adult patients with GERD in a Chinese population had different characteristics. Elderly GERD patients were predominantly male, rarely presented with typical GERD symptoms and their quality of life was less impaired compared with younger GERD patients.
COMMENTS
Background
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease which has an impact on the everyday lives of affected individuals. The prevalence of the disease increases with age, but elderly patients present less frequently with typical symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation, which are quite different from symptoms of young subjects.
Research frontiers
Several previous studies assessed clinical symptoms and quality of life of GERD patients using the questionnaire. However, to date, no studies have been conducted to compare the quality of life of young and old patients with GERD. The aim of this study was to compare the presentation and impact of quality of life in younger and elderly GERD patients in a Chinese population.
Innovations and breakthroughs
The study found more female patients in the younger group, and more males in the elderly group. The younger cases had more severe and frequent typical symptoms than the elderly patients. Significantly impaired daily activities were noted in the younger patients compared with the elderly group, except for physical functioning.
Applications
The diagnostic features of GERD should be determined in the elderly, since these patients have rare presentations of typical symptoms, and less impaired quality of life compared with younger cases in a Chinese population.
Peer review
It's an interesting and important manuscript in which the vluable index based on patient has been shown.
Footnotes
Peer reviewer: Bernabe Matias Quesada, MD, Department of Surgery, Hospital Cosme Argerich, Talcahuano 944 9A, Buenos Aires 1013, Argentina
S- Editor Wu X L- Editor Cant MR E- Editor Xiong L
Mold JW, Reed LE, Davis AB, Allen ML, Decktor DL, Robinson M. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in elderly patients in a primary care setting.Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:965-970.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Zeitoun P, Salmon L, Bouché O, Jolly D, Thiéfin G. Outcome of erosive/ulcerative reflux oesophagitis in 181 consecutive patients 5 years after diagnosis.Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;30:470-474.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Pilotto A, Di Mario F, Malfertheiner P. Upper gastrointestinal diseases in the elderly.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:801-808.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Dekel R, Green C, Quan S, Stephen G, Fass R. The relationship between severity and frequency of symptoms and quality of sleep (QOS) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Gastroenterol. 2003;124:A414.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Tsai MC, Lin HL, Lin CC, Lin HC, Chen YH, Pfeiffer S, Lin LH. Increased risk of concurrent asthma among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a nationwide population-based study.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:1169-1173.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
