Published online Dec 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5754
Revised: October 11, 2009
Accepted: October 18, 2009
Published online: December 7, 2009
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a treatable complication of decompensated cirrhosis. Coagulopathy with evidence of hyperfibrinolysis or clinically evident disseminated intravascular coagulation precludes paracentesis. Alcoholic hepatitis with fever, leucocytosis and abdominal pain should be evaluated for SBP. Oral ofloxacin is as effective as parenteral cefotaxime in treatment of SBP except for inpatients with vomiting, encephalopathy, or renal failure. Albumin is superior to hydroxyethyl starch in treatment of SBP.
- Citation: Jain P. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: Few additional points. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(45): 5754-5755
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i45/5754.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5754
We read with great interest the article “Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis” by Koulaouzidis et al[1] in March 7, 2009 issue of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The review was extensive. However, some points may be useful for the management of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).
Serious complications unusually occur in paracentesis, but a subgroup of patients with renal failure should be carefully monitored. Pache et al[2] observed 9 bleeding complications in their study of 4729 paracentesis patients, which were probably due to qualitative platelet abnormality in 8 patients with renal failure.
Coagulopathy precludes paracentesis only when there is clinically evident hyperfibrinolysis or disseminated intravascular coagulation[3]. Ascitic fluid leak post paracentesis can be prevented by inserting a needle along the Z-track and keeping the patient in the right lateral position for a few hours.
Biochemical tests are required for total protein and albumin in each ascitic fluid sample whereas optional tests are required for glucose and lactate dehydrogenase levels[3].
Ascitic fluid culture should be performed before antibiotics are used because even a single dose of antibiotics causes the culture to produce no growth of bacteria in 86% of cases[4].
Patients with alcoholic hepatitis present with fever, leukocytosis and abdominal pain mimicking SBP. An elevated ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear count in these patients is not due to peripheral leukocytosis[5] but may represent SBP. Empiric treatment with antibiotics can be discontinued after 48 h if ascitic fluid, blood and urine cultures are negative.
Oral ofloxacin (400 mg, twice a day for an average of 8 d) is as effective as parenteral cefotaxime against SBP when the patients do not have vomiting, shock, grade II (or higher) hepatic encephalopathy or serum creatinine > 3 mg/dL[6].
Sigal et al[7] have shown in their study that albumin should be used in SBP patients with their serum creatinine > 1 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen > 30 mg/dL, or total bilirubin > 4 mg/dL, and not used in patients without such indications. Albumin is superior to hydroxyethyl starch in treatment of SBP[8].
Fernández et al [9] in their randomized trial have shown that daily norfloxacin can prevent SBP and hepatorenal syndrome and has a survival advantage in patients with their ascitic fluid protein < 1.5 gm/dL and at least with one of the following indications, namely serum creatinine ≥ 1.2 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen ≥ 25 mg/dL, serum sodium ≤ 130 mg/L, Child-Pugh ≥ 9 points, and bilirubin ≥ 3 mg/dL.
Intermittent dosing of double, enforced trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (5 doses per week) or ciprofloxacin (single oral dose of 750 mg per week) may be ineffective against resistant flora[10].
In conclusion, proper selection of patients for paracentesis, high index for suspected SBP in alcoholic hepatitis patients and albumin treatment can help the management of SBP.
Peer reviewer: Diego Garcia-Compean, MD, Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Ave Madero y Gonzalitos, 64700 Monterrey, NL, México
S- Editor Wang JL L- Editor Wang XL E- Editor Lin YP
1. | Koulaouzidis A, Bhat S, Saeed AA. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1042-1049. [Cited in This Article: ] |
2. | Pache I, Bilodeau M. Severe haemorrhage following abdominal paracentesis for ascites in patients with liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:525-529. [Cited in This Article: ] |
3. | Runyon BA. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:2087-2107. [Cited in This Article: ] |
4. | Akriviadis EA, Runyon BA. Utility of an algorithm in differentiating spontaneous from secondary bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:127-133. [Cited in This Article: ] |
5. | Antillon MR, Runyon BA. Effect of marked peripheral leukocytosis on the leukocyte count in ascites. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:509-510. [Cited in This Article: ] |
6. | Navasa M, Follo A, Llovet JM, Clemente G, Vargas V, Rimola A, Marco F, Guarner C, Forné M, Planas R. Randomized, comparative study of oral ofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:1011-1017. [Cited in This Article: ] |
7. | Sigal SH, Stanca CM, Fernandez J, Arroyo V, Navasa M. Restricted use of albumin for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gut. 2007;56:597-599. [Cited in This Article: ] |
8. | Fernández J, Monteagudo J, Bargallo X, Jiménez W, Bosch J, Arroyo V, Navasa M. A randomized unblinded pilot study comparing albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology. 2005;42:627-634. [Cited in This Article: ] |
9. | Fernández J, Navasa M, Planas R, Montoliu S, Monfort D, Soriano G, Vila C, Pardo A, Quintero E, Vargas V. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:818-824. [Cited in This Article: ] |
10. | Terg R, Llano K, Cobas SM, Brotto C, Barrios A, Levi D, Wasen W, Bartellini MA. Effects of oral ciprofloxacin on aerobic gram-negative fecal flora in patients with cirrhosis: results of short- and long-term administration, with daily and weekly dosages. J Hepatol. 1998;29:437-442. [Cited in This Article: ] |