Review Open Access
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2008; 14(20): 3123-3128
Published online May 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3123
Strategy for treatment of nonerosive reflux disease in Asia
Toru Hiyama, Masaharu Yoshihara, Health Service Center, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8521, Japan
Shinji Tanaka, Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
Ken Haruma, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki 701-0192, Japan
Kazuaki Chayama, Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Division of Frontier Medical Science, Programs for Biomedical Research, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
Author contributions: Hiyama T, Yoshihara M and Tanaka S analyzed data; Hiyama T wrote the paper; Haruma K and Chayama K supervised this review.
Correspondence to: Toru Hiyama, MD, PhD, Health Service Center, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima 739-8521, Japan. tohiyama@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-82-4246191
Fax: +81-82-4227156
Received: February 25, 2008
Revised: April 1, 2008
Accepted: April 8, 2008
Published online: May 28, 2008

Abstract

The paper is to review the clinical and pathophysiologic differences between of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and reflux esophagitis (RE), and to propose a treatment strategy for NERD, especially for patients in Asia. A Medline search was performed regarding the clinical and pathophysiologic differences between NERD and RE, and treatment of NERD and RE. The characteristics of NERD patients in Asia are as follows: (1) high proportion of female patients, (2) low frequency of hiatal hernia, (3) high frequency of H pylori infection, (4) severe glandular atrophy of the gastric mucosa, and (5) frequent resistance to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. In Asian NERD patients, exposure of the esophagus to acid is not increased, and esophageal motility is normal. These characteristics are similar to those of patients in Western countries. Our recommended first-choice treatment is administration of PPI in combination with a prokinetic agent. However, at present, because there is limited evidence regarding effective treatments for NERD, it is best to try several different treatment strategies to find the best treatment for each patient.

Key Words: Nonerosive reflux disease; Asia; Treatment



INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that develops when reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications[1]. GERD is more common in Western countries than in Asian countries, such as China, Korea, and Japan. Epidemiologic studies show a prevalence of GERD symptoms in Western countries ranging from 20% to 40%[23] and in Asian countries ranging from 5% to 17%[4]. The prevalence in Asian countries has increased gradually[4]. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of erosive GERD [reflux esophagitis (RE)], and the Los Angeles (LA) classification of esophagitis is generally accepted as the best means for endoscopic assessment of GERD[5]. In Japan, the prevalence of RE (LA classification grades A, B, C, and D) is approximately 15%, and most of these cases are grade A or B[6]. The majority of GERD cases are cases of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).

NERD was previously considered a mild/early type of RE that would progress to severe RE. However, it was reported that, regardless of therapy, only 2.7% of NERD patients develop RE after 3 years and only 3% of patients develop RE after 6 years[7]. A recent retrospective study of 2306 GERD patients found that these patients at least two separate upper endoscopic examinations during the 7-year (mean) follow-up period. Examinations revealed that 69% of the patients were unchanged, 21% were improved, and 11% became worse[8]. Another study[9] reported similar results. These studies suggest that NERD rarely progresses to RE over time. In addition, NERD is significantly more refractory to treatment than RE[3]. Therefore, it was recently suggested that the underlying mechanism of development of NERD is different from that of RE. Here we review the clinical and pathophysiologic differences between NERD and RE and propose a treatment strategy for NERD, especially for patients in Asia.

METHODS

Studies on GERD were identified by computerized and manual searches of the available literature. The Medline search (1975-2007) was performed using the following medical subject headings: reflux disease and Asia. Papers published in English were considered.

CLINICAL AND ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF NERD IN ASIA

Several researchers examined characteristics of NERD and RE patients in Asia[1018]. The male/female ratios ranged from 0.59 to 1.65 in NERD patients. On the other hand, those of RE patients ranged from 1.18 to 7.13. A higher proportion of female patients was observed in NERD patients compared with RE patients. There were differences between NERD patients and RE patients in frequency of hiatal hernia, frequency of H pylori infection, grade of glandular atrophy of the gastric mucosa, and effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy as well. Namely, compared with the RE patients, the characteristics of NERD patients in Asia are as follows: (1) higher proportion of female patients, (2) lower frequency of hiatal hernia, (3) higher frequency of H pylori infection, (4) severe glandular atrophy of the gastric mucosa, and (5) frequent resistance to PPI therapy (Table 1). In addition, Asian NERD patients are more frequently affected by functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and psychiatric diseases than RE patients[13]. These characteristics are similar to those of Western NERD patients. However, there are several other characteristics in Western NERD patients, such as younger age and less obese[3]. As the prevalence of H pylori infection in Asian populations has decreased to levels similar to those in Western populations, these additional characteristics may be observed in Asian patients in the near future.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of NERD and RE patients in Asia.
NERDRE
Male/Female0.59-1.651.18-7.13
Average age (yr)45.2-57.549.0-59.7
Mean body mass index (kg/m2)22.1-23.121.7-24.2
Complication of hiatal hernia (%)17.7-34.835.1-77.0
H pylori infection (%)36.3-48.318.0-32.3
Glandular atrophy of the gastric mucosa (open-type) (%)25.0-43.06.7-25.0
Efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (%)29.5-64.055.4-90.3

With respect to esophageal motility, NERD patients have several characteristics that differ from those of RE patients. In NERD patients, the resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure is not decreased. In addition, exposure of the esophagus to acid is not increased, and esophageal motility is normal (Table 2)[19]. These characteristics are similar to those of patients in Western countries, although the grades of motility index abnormalities in Asian RE patients are lower than those in Western RE patients[20].

Table 2 Esophageal motility characteristics in NERD and RE patients in Asia.
NERDRE
Resting LES pressureMildly increasedModerately decreased
Reflux episodes/hourModerately increasedModerately increased
Primary peristalsisNormalModerately decreased
Secondary peristalsisMildly decreasedModerately decreased
Acid clearanceMildly delayedModerately delayed

It seems that there are differences in pathophysiology between Asian RE patients and Western RE patients, because the grades of motility index abnormalities are different between them. However, there seems no significant difference in pathophysiology between Asian NERD and Western NERD patients, because clinical and esophageal motility characteristics are considerably similar between them.

PATHOPHISIOLOGY OF NERD

The main pathophysiology of RE is excessive exposure of the esophagus to gastric acid. Approximately 90% of patients with RE can be cured with a PPI, which is the strongest type of gastric acid suppressor[3]. In contrast, only one-third of NERD patients can be cured with a PPI. Although the cause of NERD that is responsive to PPI may be excessive exposure of the esophagus to acid, PPI-resistant NERD may be associated with the factors described below.

Incomplete acid suppression

In some patients, even the highest approved dose of PPI cannot sufficiently suppress gastric acid secretion. In patients with insufficient gastric acid suppression, gastric juice may reflux, exposing the esophagus to acid. The time required for metabolism of PPI differs between patients possibly due to polymorphisms in the genes encoding metabolic enzymes, such as CYP2C19[2122]. In patients with the rapid metabolic phenotype, administration of twice the approved dose of PPI and concomitant administration of PPI and H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) may be more effective[2324]. It has also been reported that administration of an aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacid may be effective for some NERD patients[25].

Esophageal hypersensitivity to acid

Some patients with severe RE do not have symptoms of acid regurgitation, even if severe esophageal acid exposure is confirmed[26]. However, many NERD patients have a normal level of esophageal acid exposure. Therefore, there appears to be significant esophageal hypersensitivity to acid exposure in PPI-resistant NERD patients, and symptoms may occur when gastric acid is refluxed[27]. Hyperosmotic foods, such as cake and chocolate, and alcoholic beverages may be the cause of this esophageal hypersensitivity[28]. Ingestion of such foods and drinks may cause heartburn. It has been suggested that ingestion of hyperosmotic foods/drinks loosens the tight junctions between esophageal epithelial cells, and when gastric acid is refluxed, it easily intrudes between epithelial cells and stimulates the terminals of sensory nerves[26].

Esophageal hypersensitivity to esophageal wall distension

In NERD patients, heartburn symptoms are induced by distension of the esophageal wall by balloon dilatation or by pumping saline into the esophageal lumen[29]. These findings suggest the possibility that foods, air, and fluids that contain no acid may cause heartburn symptoms simply by distending of the esophageal wall.

Reflux of duodenal juice (bile and pancreatic juice)

PPI suppresses gastric acid excretion but has no effect on reflux itself. Therefore, in patients with duodenogastric reflux, duodenal juice (bile and pancreatic juice) may be refluxed into the esophagus. It is possible that the refluxed duodenal juice may affect the esophageal mucosa[30]. NERD patients frequently have functional dyspepsia[4], and significant duodenogastric reflux and delayed gastric emptying time in patients with functional dyspepsia have been reported[3132]. These findings support the idea that reflux of duodenal juice into the esophagus causes NERD.

Esophageal motility abnormalities

It has been reported that NERD patients show normal resting LES pressure and primary contraction waves but significantly reduced frequency of secondary contraction waves[1933]. This may be due to a reduced response to distension of the esophageal wall. Secondary contraction waves are stimulated by distension of the esophageal wall and act to discharge refluxed gastric acid and air into the stomach. Heartburn symptoms may be associated with reduced motility function in the esophageal wall.

Sustained esophageal contraction

Sustained contraction of the longitudinal muscles of the esophagus causes heartburn, and prolonged contraction may lead to chest pain. This phenomenon is called sustained esophageal contraction (SEC) and is identified by intraluminal ultrasonography[3435]. SEC occurs just before the onset of heartburn symptoms. There are two types of SEC: SEC with or without subsequent acid reflux. Because patients with the latter type also have heartburn symptoms, the association of SEC with NERD is of great interest.

Psychological factors

NERD patients frequently have mental disorders[13]. Psychological factors are associated with response to treatment as well as symptoms[36]. A high level of anxiety is predictive for the nonresponse to acid suppression therapy.

Eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitits affects both children and adults and is characterized by symptoms of GERD and dense esophageal eosinophilia, both of which are unresponsive to PPI[3738]. This disease is caused by food allergies or by aeroallergens. Effective treatment include systemic/topical corticosteroids, or specific food elimination. Esophageal stricture is a potential complication, and the natural history of the disease is still unknown. Eosinophilic esophagitis may be diagnosed as PPI-resistant NERD, but should be excluded from the diagnosis of NERD.

TREATMENT STRATEGY FOR NERD IN ASIA

At present, PPI-based step-down treatment is recommended for GERD patients[3940]. In a meta-analysis, the relative risks of PPI and H2RA treatment for NERD compared with placebo were 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.78) and 0.84 (0.74-0.95), respectively, indicating that PPI is a more effective treatment than H2RA[41]. PPI treatment can eliminate NERD symptoms faster than H2RA treatment. In addition, PPI treatment has been reported to be more cost-effective than other treatment[42].

Prokinetics such as mosapride, itopride, metclo-pramide, and domperidone are also effective for treatment of NERD[4345]. Prokinetics are thought to work by reducing reflux of duodenal juice into the esophagus[31] and speeding absorption of PPI. In addition, mosapride improves esophageal motility, whereas metclopramide and domperidone do not have this ability[46]. Mosapride shortens bolus transit time in the esophagus, reduces the duration of the longest reflux episode and reflux fraction time, and enhances the contraction strength in the lower esophagus.

Reflux of stomach contents is related to transient LES relaxation (TLESR) in NERD patients[47]. Therefore, control of TLESR is another important point for NERD treatment. 5-HT3, cholecystokinin (CCK)-A, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors influence TLESR[4850]. 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, CCK-A receptor antagonist, and GABA receptor agonist reduce the frequency of TLESR. Mosapride is a selective 5-HT4 receptor agonist, and the metabolite acts as a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist[5152]. Therefore, mosapride reduces the frequency of TLESR, leading to reduced gastric acid reflux in NERD patients.

Some NERD cases are refractory to PPI and/or prokinetics. In these patients, psychological factors may be associated with symptoms. In these patients, administration of an antidepressant and/or minor tranquilizer should be considered. However, evidence for the benefits of these agents in treatment of NERD is weak[53], and further studies are needed to clarify the effects of such medications on NERD.

For NERD patients with infrequent symptoms of heartburn, on-demand therapy with PPI (and/or prokinetics) is proposed as the best treatment option[5455]. Additional studies of the effectiveness of this treatment regimen are needed.

Here we propose a new strategy for treatment of NERD in Asia based on the basic idea of step-down therapy (Figure 1). The recommended first-choice treatment is administration of PPI in combination with a prokinetic agent such as mosapride. PPI can cure only one-third of NERD patients, a prokinetic agent in conjunction with the PPI can increase the efficacy. NERD is frequently associated with functional dyspepsia that can be treated with prokinetic agents. In addition, because the quality of life of NERD patients is quite low, NERD patients need quicker and more effective treatment options[56]. If this treatment is not effective, twice the recommended dose of PPI or combined treatment with PPI and an H2RA is recommended. PPI together with on-demand aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacid might be effective. If these treatments are not effective, administration of an antidepressant or minor tranquilizer should be considered. Herbal medicines such as rikkunshito may provide relief for some patients[57], and are often administered especially in Asian countries.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Proposed treatment strategy for NERD patients in Asia. A: Patients with moderate or severe symptoms; B: Patients with infrequent symptoms.

For patients with infrequent symptoms, on-demand treatment with PPI and/or a prokinetic agent is recommended. However, there is not sufficient evidence for a best treatment for NERD. Further studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of treatment. Large-scale, double-blind, randomized controlled trials of PPI vs PPI with a prokinetic agent are also needed to clarify the benefit of the prokinetic agent.

Further trials are needed to establish the strategy for treatment of NERD. At present, because there is limited evidence regarding effective treatments for the disease, it is best to try several different treatment strategies to find the best treatment for each patient.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Roger Jones, Professor, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King’s College London, 5 Lambeth Walk, London SE11 6SP, United Kingdom

References
1.  Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900-1920; quiz 1943.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Moayyedi P, Talley NJ. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 2006;367:2086-2100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Fass R. Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeutic characteristics. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:131-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Wong BC, Kinoshita Y. Systematic review on epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:398-407.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, Johnson F, Hongo M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Manabe N, Yoshihara M, Sasaki A, Tanaka S, Haruma K, Chayama K. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with low-grade reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:949-954.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Kuster E, Ros E, Toledo-Pimentel V, Pujol A, Bordas JM, Grande L, Pera C. Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six year follow up of 107 patients. Gut. 1994;35:8-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Sontag SJ, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, Leya J, Metz A. The long-term natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:398-404.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Fullard M, Kang JY, Neild P, Poullis A, Maxwell JD. Systematic review: does gastro-oesophageal reflux disease progress? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:33-45.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Fujiwara Y, Higuchi K, Shiba M, Yamamori K, Watanabe Y, Sasaki E, Tominaga K, Watanabe T, Oshitani N, Arakawa T. Differences in clinical characteristics between patients with endoscopy-negative reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:754-758.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Nakamura T, Shirakawa K, Masuyama H, Sugaya H, Hiraishi H, Terano A. Minimal change oesophagitis: a disease with characteristic differences to erosive oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21 Suppl 2:19-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Mishima I, Adachi K, Arima N, Amano K, Takashima T, Moritani M, Furuta K, Kinoshita Y. Prevalence of endoscopically negative and positive gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Japanese. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1005-1009.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Wu JC, Cheung CM, Wong VW, Sung JJ. Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:690-695.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Miwa H, Sasaki M, Furuta T, Koike T, Habu Y, Ito M, Fujiwara Y, Wada T, Nagahara A, Hongo M. Efficacy of rabeprazole on heartburn symptom resolution in patients with non-erosive and erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter study from Japan. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:69-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Kinoshita Y, Kobayashi T, Kato M, Asahina K, Haruma K, Shimatani T, Inoue S, Kabemura T, Kurosawa S, Kuwayama H. The pharmacodynamic effect of omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg once daily in patients with nonerosive reflux disease in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:554-561.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Cheung TK, Wong WM, Wong NY, Chan CK, Fung J, Yuen MF, Chan AO, Tong TS, Wong BC. Symptom resolution does not predict healing of erosive oesophagitis in Chinese. Digestion. 2007;75:128-134.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Dinakaran NH, Rajkumar JS, Potdar NP, Desai A. An open non-comparative clinical study for the evaluation of safety and efficacy of esomeprazole in patients of reflux oesophagitis in Indian population. J Indian Med Assoc. 2002;100:624-626.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Lee YC, Lin JT, Wang HP, Chiu HM, Wu MS. Influence of cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism and dosage of rabeprazole on accuracy of proton-pump inhibitor testing in Chinese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1286-1292.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Wong WM, Lai KC, Hui WM, Hu WH, Huang JQ, Wong NY, Xia HH, Chan OO, Lam SK, Wong BC. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux diseases in Chinese--role of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and esophageal motor dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2088-2093.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Sifrim D, Zhang X. Pathophysiology of GERD in China: the same factors at a lower scale. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2094-2097.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Horai Y, Kimura M, Furuie H, Matsuguma K, Irie S, Koga Y, Nagahama T, Murakami M, Matsui T, Yao T. Pharmacodynamic effects and kinetic disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:793-803.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Sakurai Y, Hirayama M, Hashimoto M, Tanaka T, Hasegawa S, Irie S, Ashida K, Kayano Y, Taguchi M, Hashimoto Y. Population pharmacokinetics and proton pump inhibitory effects of intravenous lansoprazole in healthy Japanese males. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30:2238-2243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Watson RG, Tham TC, Johnston BT, McDougall NI. Double blind cross-over placebo controlled study of omeprazole in the treatment of patients with reflux symptoms and physiological levels of acid reflux--the "sensitive oesophagus". Gut. 1997;40:587-590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Tytgat GN. Review article: treatment of mild and severe cases of GERD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16 Suppl 4:73-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Graham DY, Patterson DJ. Double-blind comparison of liquid antacid and placebo in the treatment of symptomatic reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1983;28:559-563.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Barlow WJ, Orlando RC. The pathogenesis of heartburn in nonerosive reflux disease: a unifying hypothesis. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:771-778.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Nagahara A, Miwa H, Minoo T, Hojo M, Kawabe M, Osada T, Kurosawa A, Asaoka D, Terai T, Ohkusa T. Increased esophageal sensitivity to acid and saline in patients with nonerosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:891-895.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Fox M, Barr C, Nolan S, Lomer M, Anggiansah A, Wong T. The effects of dietary fat and calorie density on esophageal acid exposure and reflux symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:439-444.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Rodriguez-Stanley S, Robinson M, Earnest DL, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B, Miner PB Jr. Esophageal hypersensitivity may be a major cause of heartburn. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:628-631.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Tack J. Review article: the role of bile and pepsin in the pathophysiology and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24 Suppl 2:10-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Kusunoki H, Haruma K, Hata J, Tani H, Okamoto E, Sumii K, Kajiyama G. Real-time ultrasonographic assessment of antroduodenal motility after ingestion of solid and liquid meals by patients with functional dyspepsia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:1022-1027.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Aoki S, Haruma K, Kusunoki H, Hata J, Hara M, Yoshida S, Tanaka S, Chayama K. Evaluation of gastric emptying measured with the 13C-octanoic acid breath test in patients with functional dyspepsia: comparison with ultrasonography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:662-666.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Fass R. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:S2-S7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Balaban DH, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, Pehlivanov N, Wisniewski R, DeSilvey D, Mittal RK. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:29-37.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Pehlivanov N, Liu J, Mittal RK. Sustained esophageal contraction: a motor correlate of heartburn symptom. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281:G743-G751.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Wiklund I, Carlsson R, Carlsson J, Glise H. Psychological factors as a predictor of treatment response in patients with heartburn: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:288-293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, Gupta SK, Justinich C, Putnam PE, Bonis P, Hassall E, Straumann A, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1342-1363.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Furuta GT, Straumann A. Review article: the pathogenesis and management of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:173-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Mine S, Iida T, Tabata T, Kishikawa H, Tanaka Y. Management of symptoms in step-down therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:1365-1370.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Ofman JJ. The economic and quality-of-life impact of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:S8-S14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  van Pinxteren B, Numans ME, Bonis PA, Lau J. Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD002095.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Habu Y, Maeda K, Kusuda T, Yoshino T, Shio S, Yamazaki M, Hayakumo T, Hayashi K, Watanabe Y, Kawai K. "Proton-pump inhibitor-first" strategy versus "step-up" strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1029-1035.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Miyamoto M, Haruma K, Takeuchi K, Kuwabara M. Frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease predicts the need for addition of prokinetics to proton pump inhibitor therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:746-751.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Ruth M, Hamelin B, Rohss K, Ludell L. The effect of mosapride, a novel prokinetic, on acid reflux variables in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998;12:35-40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Kim YS, Kim TH, Choi CS, Shon YW, Kim SW, Seo GS, Nah YH, Choi MG, Choi SC. Effect of itopride, a new prokinetic, in patients with mild GERD: a pilot study. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:4210-4214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Ruth M, Finizia C, Cange L, Lundell L. The effect of mosapride on oesophageal motor function and acid reflux in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:1115-1121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Iwakiri K, Hayashi Y, Kotoyori M, Tanaka Y, Kawakami A, Sakamoto C, Holloway RH. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the major mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux but are not the cause of reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1072-1077.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Koutsoumbi P, Epanomeritakis E, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis H, Chrysos E, Zoras O, Vassilakis JS, Xynos E. The effect of erythromycin on human esophageal motility is mediated by serotonin receptors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3388-3392.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Adelson DW, Million M, Kanamoto K, Palanca T, Tache Y. Coordinated gastric and sphincter motility evoked by intravenous CCK-8 as monitored by ultrasonomicrometry in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;286:G321-G322.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  McDermott CM, Abrahams TP, Partosoedarso E, Hyland N, Ekstrand J, Monroe M, Hornby PJ. Site of action of GABA(B) receptor for vagal motor control of the lower esophageal sphincter in ferrets and rats. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1749-1762.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Matsuo K, Kusunoki H, Kamada T, Ito M, Tanaka S, Nishi N, Chayama K, Haruma K. Meta-analysis of the effects of prokinetic agents in patients with functional dyspepsia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:304-310.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Matsuo K, Kusunoki H, Kamada T, Ito M, Tanaka S, Chayama K, Haruma K. Treatment of functional dyspepsia with serotonin agonists: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1566-1570.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Tack J, Fass R. Review article: approaches to endoscopic-negative reflux disease: part of the GERD spectrum or a unique acid-related disorder? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19 Suppl 1:28-34.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Metz DC, Inadomi JM, Howden CW, van Zanten SJ, Bytzer P. On-demand therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:642-653.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Juul-Hansen P, Rydning A. On-demand PPI requirements in patients with endoscopy-negative GERD. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:746-749.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Prasad M, Rentz AM, Revicki DA. The impact of treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life: a literature review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21:769-790.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Kawahara H, Kubota A, Hasegawa T, Okuyama H, Ueno T, Ida S, Fukuzawa M. Effects of rikkunshito on the clinical symptoms and esophageal acid exposure in children with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23:1001-1005.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]