BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2026; 32(38): 121333
Published online Oct 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121333
Figure 1
Figure 1 Endoscopic images of severe ulcerative colitis. A-C: They show severe diffuse inflammation, friable mucosa, spontaneous bleeding and ulcerations, loss of the normal vascular pattern with granular mucosal pattern, pseudopolyps; D-F: Deep ulceration with mucosal bridge and necrosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Endoscopic images of complicated ulcerative colitis. A: Colorectal adenocarcinoma; B and C: High-grade dysplasia.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography abdomen and pelvis in case of active ulcerative colitis. A: Axial computed tomography (CT) image showed sigmoid colonic segmental wall thickening with mucosal enhancement and submucosal edema; B: Axial CT image showed descending colonic segmental wall thickening with mucosal enhancement and submucosal edema; C: Coronal CT image showed descending colonic segmental wall thickening with hyperemia, prominence of the pericolonic mesenteric vessels (arrow) and pericolic fat stranding is present.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Short-term outcomes in weeks 12 among both groups. IFX: Infliximab; IVCS: Intravenous corticosteroids.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Long-term outcomes at the end of the follow-up period (weeks 144) among both groups. IFX: Infliximab; IVCS: Intravenous corticosteroids.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Comparison of Mayo scores between group 1 (infliximab) and group 2 (intravenous corticosteroids) at baseline and during follow-up (weeks 12, 48, 96, and 144). Horizontal lines indicate the median, and boxes represent the interquartile range. IFX: Infliximab; IVCS: Intravenous corticosteroids.


Write to the Help Desk