BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2025; 31(36): 107703
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i36.107703
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart illustrating the study design and patient selection process. ALD: Alcohol-related liver disease; LS: Liver stiffness; US: Ultrasound; CFF: Critical flicker frequency.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Critical flicker frequency in patients with and without alcohol-related liver disease and diagnostic accuracy to detect hepatic encephalopathy. A: Critical flicker frequency (CFF) in patients with alcohol-related liver disease, non-alcohol-related liver disease etiologies, and healthy volunteers (controls). The mean CFF is significantly lower in disease groups compared to controls. However, a wider spread of CFF values is observed among patients, with some individuals showing higher CFF values than controls; B: Receiver operating characteristic curve for the detection of overt hepatic encephalopathy (n = 12). The area under the curve was 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.84, P = 0.0142), with an optimal cutoff for hepatic encephalopathy at 36.5 Hz. P values were determined using Tukey’s test. ALD: Alcohol-related liver disease; CFF: Critical flicker frequency. aP < 0.05, cP < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Effect of cirrhosis status on critical flicker frequency and alcohol detoxification stratified by cirrhosis status. A: Critical flicker frequency (CFF) in patients with cirrhosis (n = 10) and without cirrhosis (n = 47) compared to controls (n = 20). Cirrhotic patients exhibit significantly lower CFF values than controls. P values were determined using Tukey’s test; B: Changes in CFF following alcohol detoxification in patients with pre- and post-detoxification measurements (n = 44). CFF was analyzed in subgroups of patients with cirrhosis (n = 6) and without cirrhosis (n = 38). CFF significantly increases in the no-cirrhosis group after alcohol detoxification. P values were determined using paired samples t-test. CFF: Critical flicker frequency. aP < 0.05, cP < 0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Comparison of critical flicker frequency. A: Liver stiffness intervals; B: Ultrasonographic signs of cirrhosis. Patients with liver stiffness > 17 kPa exhibited significantly lower critical flicker frequency values than those with LS < 6 kPa (P < 0.05). The difference between patients with and without sonographic signs of cirrhosis did not reach statistical significance. P values were determined using an unpaired independent samples t-test. CFF: Critical flicker frequency. aP < 0.05.