Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2024; 30(27): 3290-3303
Published online Jul 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i27.3290
Figure 1
Figure 1 Total ion chromatogram. A: Negative mode; B: Positive mode.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Principal component analysis. A: Positive mode; B: Negative mode. SG: Lean metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (metabolic-associated fatty liver disease); SZC: Healthy lean individuals.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis. A: Positive mode; B: Negative mode. SG: Lean-type metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (metabolic-associated fatty liver disease); SZC: Lean healthy individuals.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Heatmap of differential metabolites.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Metabolic pathway enrichment analysis.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Standard material and sample total ion chromatograms. A: Standard material; B: Sample total.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Multiple reaction monitoring chromatograms of palmitic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, arachidonic acid, and internal standards. A: Standards; B: Samples. PA: Palmitic acid; OA: Oleic acid; LA: Linoleic acid; AA: Arachidonic acid; OA-d9: Deuterated oleic acid.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Effects of fatty acids on metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. Through serum targeted metabolomics studies, we measured four specific biomarkers. The preliminary conclusion was that the transformation of lean control individuals to lean metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) may affect the Oleic acid, linoleic-arachidonic acid and palmitic acid pathways. Linoleic acid is converted to arachidonic acid by Δ-6 desaturase, as shown in the figure.