Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2016; 22(36): 8242-8246
Published online Sep 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i36.8242
Figure 1
Figure 1 Esophagogastroduodenoscopic views of the tumor in the stomach. A: The protruded tumor occupied and existed beyond the pyloric ring, the whole tumor could not fit in one field of view; B: Image observed by inverting the endoscope in the duodenal bulb; C: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging showed sturucture irregularities compared with the normal surrounding mucosa.
Figure 2
Figure 2 A macroscopic view of the specimen resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. A: Macroscopic appearance of the specimen soaked for almost 24 h in formalin after endoscopic submucosal dissection. The red dotted line indicates where there was a pyloric ring; B: Cut out of the resected specimen. The solid red line indicates adenocarcinoma; green line indicates neuroendocrine tumor; red dotted line indicates the location of the pylorus.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Histopathological results of the resected specimen. A: Low power view of a histological section demonstrates that the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in the submucosa was covered with adenocarcinoma (HE stain × 40); B: Both component cells had mixed in some parts and formed a tumor alveolar (H&E stain × 400); C: High power view of NET in submucosa (HE stain × 400); D: CD56; E: syNaptophisin; F: Chromogranin A staining were positive in the NET cells; G: Lymphatic invasion of the NET component seen with D2-40 staining (× 400).