BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 17
  • This Article
Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
  • Total Article Views (9382)
All Articles published online
The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-12) series, Tables (1-2) series.
Item 
Count 
PDF509
WORD245
HTML5028
Figures (1-12)495
Tables (1-2)479
 Sum=6756
Publishing Process of This Article
The chart showing Browse series, Download series.
Item 
Count 
Browse1139
Download1487
 Sum=2626
May 7, 2015 (publication date) through Oct 30, 2025
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN
1007-9327
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2015; 21(17): 5393-5406
Published online May 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5393
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1 The flowchart for systematic review.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Demographic characteristics between transvaginal cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy; CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Meta-analysis for overall postoperative complications. Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 4
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 4 Conversion rate during transvaginal cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy; CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 5
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 5 Meta-analysis for operative time between transvaginal cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy; CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 6
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 6 Negligible vaginal bleeding rate post-transvaginal cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy.
Figure 7
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 7 The rate of using an additional trocar during transvaginal cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy.
Figure 8
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 8 Meta-analysis for pain score and postoperative consumption of analgesics. Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy; CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 9
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 9 Meta-analysis for postoperative hospital stay. Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy; CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 10
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 10 Meta-analysis for return to work. Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy; CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Figure 11
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 11 Predictive postoperative dyspareunia rate after transvaginal cholecystectomy. TVC: Transvaginal cholecystectomy.
Figure 12
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 12 Funnel plot based on the incidence of postoperative morbidity.
Write to the Help Desk
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

California Corporate Number: 3537345