Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2015; 21(16): 4875-4882
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875
Published online Apr 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875
Figure 1 Process of establishing the rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma model.
Tumor-bearing rabbits were anesthetized with chloral hydrate. A: Fish-like tissue at the edge of the tumor was removed under sterile conditions; B: The tumor tissue was placed in saline for washing and to remove the necrotic tissue, fascia and other connective tissues; C: The tumor tissue was cut into small pieces (0.5-1 mm diameter) using scissors; D: Healthy rabbits were anesthetized and placed on a rabbit operating table with their limbs fixed at the four corners. Routine sterilization of the surgical field was performed, and a vertical incision was made below the xiphoid. Then, the liver was exposed; E: After exposure of the middle lobe of the liver using smooth forceps, a 15 G needle was inserted sideways and upward into the visceral surface of the liver lobe, and 0.5 mL of tumor fragments was injected with a 5 mL syringe. During this process, we ensured that the tumor fragments were injected into the liver parenchyma; F: The puncture site was covered with gelfoam after removal of the needle, and the incision was sutured after confirming that there was no obvious bleeding.
Figure 2 Magnetic resonance imaging of successfully implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma (shown by arrow).
A, B: T1- and T2-weighted images of a successfully implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma; C, D: T1- and T2-weighted images of another successfully implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma.
Figure 3 Magnetic resonance imaging of an implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma with celiac implantation (shown with an arrow).
A, B: T1- and T2-weighted images of an implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma with celiac implantation; C, D: T1- and T2-weighted images of another implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma with celiac implantation.
Figure 4 Magnetic resonance imaging of an implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma with abdominal wall invasion (shown by arrow).
A, B: T1- and T2-weighted images of an implanted VX2 carcinoma with abdominal wall invasion; C, D: T1- and T2-weighted images of another implanted VX2 hepatocarcinoma with abdominal wall invasion.
Figure 5 Histological findings for intrahepatic nodules or masses observed through magnetic resonance imaging.
HE staining (A: × 100; B: × 400): the tumor cells were morphologically diverse, with obviously heterogeneous and trachychromatic nuclei; karyokinesis could also be found (shown by arrow).
- Citation: Chen Z, Kang Z, Xiao EH, Tong M, Xiao YD, Li HB. Comparison of two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(16): 4875-4882
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i16/4875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.4875