Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2013; 19(48): 9453-9460
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of included and excluded trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Forest plot demonstrating no significant difference in complete stone removal between endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy alone and in patients with stone size larger than 15 mm. A: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) plus large-balloon dilation (LBD) and EST alone; B: EST plus LBD and EST alone and in patients with stone size larger than 15 mm.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plot demonstrating. A: The use of mechanical lithotripsy in the endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) plus large-balloon dilation (LBD) group decreased significantly in patients with stone size larger than 15 mm; B: No significant difference in procedure time between EST plus LBD and EST alone.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Funnel plot did not show publication bias.