Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2013; 19(48): 9453-9460
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453
Figure 1 Flow chart of included and excluded trials.
Figure 2 Forest plot demonstrating no significant difference in complete stone removal between endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy alone and in patients with stone size larger than 15 mm.
A: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) plus large-balloon dilation (LBD) and EST alone; B: EST plus LBD and EST alone and in patients with stone size larger than 15 mm.
Figure 3 Forest plot demonstrating.
A: The use of mechanical lithotripsy in the endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) plus large-balloon dilation (LBD) group decreased significantly in patients with stone size larger than 15 mm; B: No significant difference in procedure time between EST plus LBD and EST alone.
Figure 4 Funnel plot did not show publication bias.
-
Citation: Yang XM, Hu B. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation
vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(48): 9453-9460 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i48/9453.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453