Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2013; 19(24): 3872-3882
Published online Jun 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3872
Published online Jun 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3872
Figure 1 Flow chart of searching strategy for study inclusion.
RFA: Radiofrequency ablation; TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
Figure 2 Comparison of combination of radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation alone for hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of overall survival rates (A-D) and recurrence-free survival rates (E-G).
A, E: Meta-analysis of 1-year results; B: Meta-analysis of 2-year results; C, F: Meta-analysis of 3-year results; D, G: Meta-analysis of 5-year results. RFA: Radiofrequency ablation; TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; OR: Odds ratio.
Figure 3 Comparison of combination of radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation alone for hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of tumor progression rate (A) and major complications (B).
RFA: Radiofrequency ablation; TACE: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; OR: Odds ratio.
Figure 4 Comparison of combination of radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation alone for small hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of survival rates.
A, B: Tumor size ≤ 3 cm; C-F: 3 cm < tumor size ≤ 5 cm; G, H: Tumor size > 5 cm; A, C, F: Meta-analysis of 1-year results; B, D, G: Meta-analysis of 3-year results; E: Meta-analysis of 5-year results.
Figure 5 Funnel plot in the analysis of the effect of 1-year overall survival rate.
OR: Odds ratio.
- Citation: Ni JY, Liu SS, Xu LF, Sun HL, Chen YT. Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation in combination with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(24): 3872-3882
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i24/3872.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3872