Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2012; 18(28): 3752-3760
Published online Jul 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i28.3752
Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic assembly of three artificial liver systems. A: Schematic assembly of non-bioartificial liver; B: Schematic assembly of bioartificial liver; C: Schematic assembly of hybrid bioartificial liver. P: Pump; RBC: Red blood cells; PS: Plasma separator; PE: Plasma component exchange column; IERC: Anionic resin adsorption column.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparisons of biochemical index between the treatment groups and the control group. ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; TBIL: Total bilirubin; ALB: Albumin; PT: Prothrombin time; HBAL: Hybrid bioartificial liver; BAL: Bioartificial liver; NBAL: Non-bioartificial liver; N: Normal; T0: Before treatment; D1: Day 1 after treatment; D3: Day 3 after treatment; D5: Day 5 after treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival of two groups. HBAL: Hybrid bioartificial liver; BAL: Bioartificial liver; NBAL: Non-bioartificial liver.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Safety evaluation. A: Xenoreactive antibodies levels during bioartificial liver treatments; B: Representative results of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction electrophoresis with the RNA extracted from the plasma. The ladder ranged from 100 bp to 600 bp. NBAL: Hybrid bioartificial liver; BAL: Bioartificial liver; PERV: Porcine endogenous retrovirus.