BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Topic Highlight
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2010; 16(11): 1349-1357
Published online Mar 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i11.1349
Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic illustration of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway. The 26S proteasome consists of the 20S core capped with the 19S regulatory complexes that recognize ubiquitinated protein substrates designated for proteolysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α and interferon (IFN) γ induce formation of immunoproteasome subunits. LMP7, LMP2 and MECL-1 subunits replace the constitutive catalytic subunits β5, β1 and β2, respectively, which shift the catalytic properties of the proteasome to generate MHC-I-binding peptides.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Proteasome interacting proteins (PIPs) involved in unfolding and docking of protein substrates designated for degradation by the proteasome. VCP: Valosin-containing protein.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Illustration of hypothetical chronic ethanol feeding effects in 26S dysfunction. As a result of phosphorylation deregulation, 20S and 19S binding is altered, which causes 26S dysfunction. Total dephosphorylation of proteasome subunits by phosphatases is prevented by 14-3-3 protein sequestration of the 20S proteasome.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Diagram showing the important role of the deubiquitinases in the process of proteasome function and removal of ubiquitinated protein substrates, as well as recycling of free ubiquitin.


Write to the Help Desk