Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2006; 12(48): 7792-7797
Published online Dec 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7792
Published online Dec 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7792
Figure 1 Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) scale score differences in six quality of life (QOL) domains in case and control groups.
Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. AB: Abdominal symptoms; FA: Fatigue; SY: Systemic symptoms; AC: Activity; EM: Emotional function; WO: Worry. NS: Not significant. bP < 0.001 vs control group.
Figure 2 Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) scale score comparison between the age groups in case and control groups.
Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. NS: Not significant.
Figure 3 Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) scale score comparison between the genders in case and control groups.
Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. NS: Not significant. bP < 0.001 vs females in control group.
Figure 4 Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) scale score comparison in six quality of life (QOL) domains by the etiology in liver cirrhosis patients.
Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. AB: Abdominal symptoms; FA: Fatigue; SY: Systemic symptoms; AC: Activity; EM: Emotional function; WO: Worry.
Figure 5 Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) scale score comparison according the disease severity in the case group.
Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval. A, B and C represent Child-Pugh class A, B and C, respectively. bP < 0.01 vs A Child-Pugh class.
- Citation: Sumskiene J, Sumskas L, Petrauskas D, Kupcinskas L. Disease-specific health-related quality of life and its determinants in liver cirrhosis patients in Lithuania. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(48): 7792-7797
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i48/7792.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7792